Its the big guy with the stick in #8.
Since this thread has already veered off course, I mights as well add to it.
“I read your Arts and Crafts Movement article a couple of times and very carefully which says the same thing as you did above. My question is who has ever previously called the Arts and Crafts Movement (basically an art and craft, furniture and building architecture reform movement) a reform movement in golf course architecture to the extent that there could legitimately be something called “arts and crafts golf architecture"? I realize you called it that a few years ago in your five part article on this website but my question is who has ever called it that before?”
I believe my essay was the first to refer to it as Arts and Crafts golf architecture, and before the essay, I mentioned it few times on GCA. In fact the genesis of the essay occurred at a lunch I had with Jeff Bauer and Ron Whitten, when the subject came up…you can credit them for inspiring me to write it. It all happened at a Chillies…I want my babyback, babyback, babyback…..
“Can you name any magazine article, newspaper article, book of any other written piece from that time that ever referred to arts and crafts golf architecture or to any influence of the arts and crafts movement on golf course architecture?”
No, nor can I find anything at that time referring to the golden age of golf architecture. We have discussed this before…like many artistic movements, the A&C Movement was identified, its influences recognized and analyzed well after it ended…its not that unusual.
On the other hand, although they did not mention it specifically…you will find reference to A&C theorists and an adoption of A&C philosophies?
“And if no one involved in it at that time ever wrote about it or never mentioned it why would that be?”
See above.
“If there really was such a reform movement in golf architecture why would noone have ever mentioned it or written about it before this?”
See the answer above….again.
“And finally, would you say that the primary reason you apparently think the bunker restoration at Aronmink was a mistake in not restoring the original multi-bunker sets is because you think that that regional style of J.B. McGovern (apparently) is an indication of a similarity to the individualism, variety and regionalism of the arts and crafts and building architecture reform philosophy?”
No. First of all it wasn’t a restoration…it was a redesign. The golf course of which Ross said at its opening….“I intended to make this course my masterpiece, but not until today did I realize I built better than I knew”….was not restored. IMO the courses bold and unique bunkering scheme are the primary reasons the golf course is historically significant and worthy of faithful restoration. Speculative restoration is a problem IMO. I also believe there is a danger in having Ross’s work homogenized by restoration architects who redo his courses a prototypical style.