The to-do on bunkers has led to this thought:
I think most golfers could be characterized as "less skilled", maybe handicap of 13 or so and up. As the game has become marginally more playable for these folks, aren't they more able to appreciate golf course architecture? If technology has allowed us to have at least some ability to direct the ball where we want it to go, doesn't this bring in features of a course we previously would have ignored? I don't think I am talking about distance gains, but more cavity-backed irons, large headed drivers, better sand irons, etc. etc.
Is it really that bad that a course like Shoreacres may have lost some interest for folks like Shivas, but many, many more golfers (this one included) can appreciate the cool features?
Jeff Goldman