I'm probably at the point where I could afford to join a private club, but cannot logically justify doing so from any perspective. In large part, this view is based on the large number of better quality public courses built in the last 15 years.
Am I missing something? If not, are private clubs in trouble over the next 20 years? If not, why not?
My thoughts, in rough order of importance are below. Some of these observations may offend some people. I do not mean them in a mean spirited way and am interested in hearing contrary views.
1. Cost - As an illustration: Assume 50 rounds per year, $5000 per year as an annual assigned cost of initiation fee (or an assessment) and $500 per month, I come up with a per round cost of $220. I can choose the public courses in my area without regard to price and average $50 per round. I can play my public course rounds, and take two major trips to almost anywhere in the world.
2. Variety of courses - In my area, there are 20 public courses I enjoy playing. Many have been built in the last 10 years. I think it is more enjoyable to play different courses rather than the same one over and over.
3. Quality of Courses - While none of the public courses match the top 5 private in the area, I think they overlap in quality from that point on. Overall, I would rather have 20 good options than one great one.
4. Complaining - When I visit private clubs, I am amazed by how much complaining seems to take place, whether about plans to assess the membership for a clubhouse or course renovations, disputes about leadership of the club, complaints about course quality, complaints about purported sandbaggers or slow players and anything else one can imagine. (I once heard of a complaint about grass growth in the trees).
5. Treatment of Employees - I am more comfortable with the way customers of a public facility treat employees. While there are certanly rude public course customers, my skin crawls at what I perceive to be a norm of treating employees of private clubs as servants.
6. Egalitarian ethics - I kind of like the fact that at my primary public course, the people I play with range from doctors or lawyers to the unemployed. Many of the best players and the most respected golfers are the least successful on a careeer basis.
There are some factors that favor private clubs, but I think their importance has diminished over the last 15 years:
1. Tee time access (not as big a difference with recent slowing of economy and additional public courses)
2. Pace of play (still a pretty big difference)
3. Course conditioning (I think this difference has grown pretty minor with the exception of extremely fast greens).
4. Practice access (I actually think public practice areas have improved to the point that there really is no difference between public and private practice facilities)
5. Course design Quality (per my comments above, this factor has diminished greatly).
I tried to keep off of this list items that purely apply to me. In particular my friends on public courses, which probably trump most of these other factors. I also kept off the value of a private club's social functions, or business development potentials which I do not think are that important and that the advantages can be obtained elsewhere.
Am I out of synch with the general golf population?