Seminole is a great golf course -- and when it reopens it will still be a great golf course.
Robert
IF that is true, then it deserves no ranking movement.
But how does anyone know right now that this will be the case? Isn't it possible the salt and water damage and loss of trees would be so bad it might take years to get it back to what it was, if it ever does? I'm asking innocently and with no axe to grind.
And if it does take that long, during the time it's unplayable - or playable only under horrid conditions - does it deserve the high ranking?
I ask this only because the Apache Stronghold example weighs heavily, I think. You had a course there that was "great" in design and concept, but that got to be pretty unplayble due to lack of and/or very spotty grass. If a course is no fun playing due to conditions, does it deserve lofty rankings?
The game is meant to be played, not viewed. So to me, conditions do matter. Certainly this is ofteno beyond what an architect can control - as appears to be the case at Apache Stronghold and is certainly the case at Seminole - but unless one is rating "design" istead of "golf course", then this just has to be tough luck.
I've never been to either of these places, by the way.
TH