Philip, you seem amazed as to the number of courses being worked on in a year. Is it possible that you are concentrating more on "27" than on what the work actually represents? Are these all 18-hole courses that will be completed within the year? Most likely a number are multi-year projects and others are renovations or additions to existing courses. That isn't to lessen the amount; to the contrary, it just brings into focus what busy architects can face. Still, what really impresses me is a comment below that i want to make to Cary.
Cary, you ask, "How can any architect be involved with 27 courses and do justice to any of them? If quantity = success, then I guess Norman has achieved architectual success.
It seems to me that the hands on architect, if talented produces a far superior product."
In your mind, why does quantity automatically mean a lesser or inferior product? Consider the work done in 1920 by A.W. Tillinghast. At a time without computers, internet, telephone systems, airplanes, interstate highway systems, he advertised the following as "SOME Work of 1920":
New Courses:
Baltusrol (36 holes)
Philadelphia Cricket Club (36 holes)
Cedar Brook (Philadelphia)
Brook Hollow (Dallas)
Suburban, (New Jersey)
Tulsa CC (Oklahoma)
Port Jervis (NY)
Kingsport CC (Tenn)
Reconstruction:
San Francisco G&CC
Fort Worth CC (Texas)
Dallas CC (Texas)
Cedar Crest (Texas)
Mount Kisco CC (NY)
Quaker Ridge (NY)
Norwood (NJ)
Spring Lake (NJ)
Upper Montclair (NJ)
Sound Beach (CONN.)
Glen Ridge (NJ)
Shawnee (PA)
And OTHERS in an Advisory Capacity.
Those courses make up an impressive career, and that was his year of 1920! Not bad.