Mindy,
The clubs reaction may have been to the irrational responses your questions on gca.com elicited and not to the questions themselves. Either way, you shouldn't be held responsible for something so innocent, or for the opinions of others which are beyond your control.
I recall that you and another from your club came on here with some questions/opinions about restoration/redesign work at your club. In return, and with no knowledge about the club (beyond its original arch.), or its plans, the club was indicted as irresponsible by some of our local ideologues. You comments weren't inflammatory, only the responses.
A club's activities are entirely its own matter, and not the subject of public debate by non-members who have only a narrow self-serving agenda. However, an innocent inquiry to a knowledge base as deep as GCA.com can't be faulted, particularly if a member feels that the club is being misled by an overzealous green committee. Hopefully, in the future, such inquiries will be met with more responsible insight.
Echoing Pat's advice, and in the words of Louis Brandeis, "sunlight is the best disinfectant."