The idea that golf at ANY level, much less the professional level, has been "deskilled" is really odd to me. Where's the evidence of that?
...
A.G.
You are probably right. It is probably better said as "differently skilled". E.g., the difference between the skills of Payne Stewart discussed above and the current crop of players such as Bubba Watson.
Payne Stewart, Billy Mayfair, Lee Trevino, and Tiger Woods would probably consider it de-skilling. Bubba Watson and J.B. Holmes probably don't consider it so.
Who cares about Bubba Watson? He has never won a professional golf tournament, on either the Nationwide or PGA tours. He is currently 25 or so spots below Billy Mayfair on the money list, and Mayfair had cancer surgery, for crying out loud.
(Holmes is only a bit different. He has 1 tour victory.)
If I was Tiger, I would want the Rules to state that the players would hit marbles with broom handles. The tougher it gets, the more he would win. That is NOT to say that the game has been deskilled, though.
As to Trevino (one of my heroes, BTW) he was a low-ball hitter that always played a fade. He is also old now. There is no surprise in hearing him lament the "good old days"; that seems to be human nature, especially among old guys. (I'm 54, so I'm no kid!) I don't think Lee Buck complained about the ball and equipment when he was in HIS prime being better than what Hogan used, just like Jack didn't complain then but does now.
Selective memory by them, and moving from the instance to the generalization by us. Both poor ways to view reality.