News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


RJ_Daley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #50 on: September 27, 2005, 08:06:24 PM »
Huck, I think on balance Pat has it right.  The one thing I'll grant you (and I wish it were my experience from ability not to spray the  ball) is if you keep it right up the most efficient line of play, Sand Hills is not as rigorous as Pat is making out.  

But, the average round at WH vs SH is IMHO quite a bit less strenuous. I know I can easily walk 36 at WH and do often.  But, my one 36 hole walk at SH was a death march.  Most recently, after playing 18 already in the day, I walked a very late twilight at WH with a 74 year old on the front 9 and shot my best 9 hole loop there, playing in 1.15 hours.  I don't think that is possible time wise - at SH.  

There are more 20ft+ tee to green elevation changes at SH than WH.  The only rigorous walk at WH (IMO) is 6 to 7 tee due to elevation up, and slightly 12 to 13.  The walk from 9 to 10 is usually paused by a refreshment at the CH.  

But, when it comes to the totality of the experience, and the challenge of the course, SH wins.  I would not play SH everyday.  Something that special should not become mundane or routine.  It is to be savored as a special treat.  I would play WH everyday for the remainder and never get bored.  
No actual golf rounds were ruined or delayed, nor golf rules broken, in the taking of any photographs that may be displayed by the above forum user.

Patrick_Mucci

Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #51 on: September 27, 2005, 08:31:30 PM »
Tom Huckaby,

In case you didn't notice, WH is a relatively FLAT golf course.

SH has substantive elevation changes on almost every hole, and the tee to fairway walks are much more difficult.

I agree that both Pacific Dunes and Bandon Dunes have some disconnect issues, with cumbersome walks.

They tend to get overlooked by the congnoscente.
I'm curious to see how they faired in the "ease of walking" category.  I'd guess that they got a pass, which they shouldn't have.

I haven't seen Pacific Trails so I can't comment.

I can tell you that the walks at Hidden Creek are minimal in comparison, and in the absolute.

With unlimited property, practically, and few environmental constraints shouldn't they have received some demerits ?

Kevin_Reilly

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #52 on: September 28, 2005, 12:37:52 AM »
I tend to agree with Patrick.  Might be the big scale of the place, but it is a more difficult walk than I expected.

As for the carts, another contributor might be the distance of the course from the clubhouse...inertia at work:

clubs and player ride to course on cart ---> clubs and player stay on cart
"GOLF COURSES SHOULD BE ENJOYED RATHER THAN RATED" - Tom Watson

Tiger_Bernhardt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #53 on: September 28, 2005, 01:24:35 AM »
Tom thank you for the note. I am in full depression. We seemed to have hired an Art Hills for a coach. Miles is 0 for 2 on minimal standards for game management and the same for half time adjustments. I was amazed 91,000 people could get there on a Monday. 1/3 to 1/2 of the state's population is homeless or without utilities now. Plus gas is really hard to come by. I think everyone was shocked to see the complete incompetance on the sidelines. Tenn played hard and deserved praise as hard as it is to give oh Mike Hendren. Oh I had a dinner in Baton Rouge this evening. I passed 12 ambulances, 2 military units and countless utility tricks on the way and a similiar amount on the way back. It seems and feels like a war zone. People are spent.
« Last Edit: September 28, 2005, 01:28:02 AM by Tiger_Bernhardt »

Craig Van Egmond

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #54 on: September 28, 2005, 08:53:09 AM »

Tiger,

     Looks like the honeymoon is over for LSU and Miles and after only 2 games. It took a couple of years here at OSU, but then we haven't won any nat'l titles in football.  I never thought that Miles was very good at making adjustments and tends to be conservative with the lead (ok, even without the lead).  Maybe he's not used to working with all that talent.  


Mike Hendren

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #55 on: September 28, 2005, 09:35:12 AM »
TigerB,

I must confess to nodding off in the 3rd quarter, despondent over the worst half of football played by the Volunteers since the Bill Battle days (we deserved that for hiring a Bama man).  I am therefore estopped from gloating over the victory.  

You, the cajuns and the saints in Louisiana deserved better.  

Look forward to seeing you next week.

Mike

Two Corinthians walk into a bar ....

THuckaby2

Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #56 on: September 28, 2005, 10:19:40 AM »
Tiger:

If ever there were a day the nation (outside of the great state of TN) was rooting for your Tigers, that was it.  Putting everything together, dammit... sure sports shouldn't matter in the context of all of this but the fact is they do.  People care.  And losing that had to hurt.... oh, in a far different way than the very real hurt people have been suffering down there, but hurt nonetheless.

Patrick:

The key here is that yes, WH is relatively flat, but again it's not like SH has mountains.  Man you need to see some real mountainous courses to put this in proper context.  Thus I have a hard time making too big of a deal out of the walk at SH.  In any case, topography never pisses me off as much as disconnects from green to tee... and while I can see WHY they exist, well the fact is they exist at BOTH courses.

In any case, I don't know how the other magazines do things but "walking" is a criterion in the Golf Digest methodology.  The definition is:

How walkable is the course in terms of terrain and distance between holes?  Evaluate this criterion even if carts are mandatory or you use a cart for your round.

I don't recall for sure what number I gave to each, but thinking about it now I'd say I give somewhere between 4-4.9 (Acceptable to Good) to both courses.

Because you have to keep it in overall context... man I have seen some horrible ones.... and some great ones too... most of those being old munis, unfortunately.

TH
« Last Edit: September 28, 2005, 10:20:09 AM by Tom Huckaby »

A_Clay_Man

Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #57 on: September 28, 2005, 11:32:02 AM »
One of the aspects of SH that makes for the tougher walk was taking advantage of the views from elevated teeing grounds. (DO I remember it correctly?)

Having now seen SH's replacement for innovated designs,(Ballyneal) I'll opine that those elevated tees will now be seen as a relative weakness. It being a connection/ to a fawed design era.

Tiger_Bernhardt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #58 on: September 28, 2005, 11:38:52 AM »
Thanks guys and Mike I am looking forward to playing next week as well. Sand Hills provide just the golf thoughts I need to take the sting of football life from this near brain dead man. It is a place that brings a tranquility to you like a moon rising over the ocean on a pretty summer night. The course is full of spots where you pinch yourself and say I am in heaven but this cannot be for I am in Nebraska. Nebraska is in hell. I am so confused. I reserve that hell thought for 10 tee shortly after putting a ball in the left rough 5 out of 6 times. The fairway is only as wide as the first at TOC. There are so many spots and situations on that course where your mind is perfectly content as you feel you are somewhere very special for that moment in time.  A deep breath and a smile say it all as you play the shot before you, pick up your bag and start walking again. That mixture of grandure and bigness of scale combined with the purest form of simplisity make Sand Hills a treasure that will be difficult to ever duplicate even in a area that seems to allow for thousands and thousands of holes to be layed out and played into the sunset without ever repeating the same.

THuckaby2

Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #59 on: September 28, 2005, 11:39:53 AM »
Adam:

I don't think you're remembering it correctly.  There are only two tees at Sand Hills that one climbs up to reach (2 and 17), and one of them doesn't exist any more (17).  Several of the tees seem raised because the ground falls off below them... but you reach them at a level from the previous green more or less.

And I'm getting the picture you really liked Ballyneal, as every post you've made since you saw it refers to it one way or another.  Good for you man.  But people give ME a hard time about being excited about new courses   ;)  

In any case, ready to throw Sand Hills on the scrap heap of flawed design are you?  That's a rather tall statement.

 ;D


A_Clay_Man

Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #60 on: September 28, 2005, 11:47:12 AM »
Huck, You don't think with SH in the can, for ten years now, Doak would allow himself to build anything that wasn't superior, do you?

THuckaby2

Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #61 on: September 28, 2005, 11:51:27 AM »
Huck, You don't think with SH in the can, for ten years now, Doak would allow himself to build anything that wasn't superior, do you?

I certainly think that Doak will try, as would any architect.

I'm not 100% certain he, or anyone, will succeed.

They're been trying to top Pine Valley for decades now, haven't they?  By all accounts except maybe mine, they're still trying.

 ;)

Tiger_Bernhardt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #62 on: September 28, 2005, 11:53:06 AM »
Adam I respect Tom's work as much as any on here but there is no guarantee that he will be able to make Ballyneal an equal much less better course. I do not think he will be able too but time will tell.

RJ_Daley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #63 on: September 28, 2005, 12:01:17 PM »
Gents, I think the amazing thing is the perspective of time.  It has only been about 10 years that Sand Hills GC has been up and running.  Yet, it is legendary.  In part, that is because of unique and adventuresome place where a journey of discovery and wonder at the unique land environment is involved to even get there.  It is sort of a golfer's "City Slickers" concept where you drive through long rolling treeless and sand dune horizons of cattle country, that get your juices flowing before you even get to the golf course.  

Wild Horse is still in the populated I-80 corridor.  Thus, you don't get the wonderous journey effect to pump your adreneline.  

Now, with Prairie Club in Valentine about to take shape, and BallyNeal opening soon, there are going to be more destinations of similar experiential effect.  As Adam has said, and from the little I've seen in mid construction, BallyNeal has the design bones to go with the "getting there" experience.

Once these sand hills, prairie dunes courses have been around about 10 years, as Sand Hills GC has, I predict that "Sand Hills golf" will be a general term, not a specific one identifying just Mullen.  Folks will barely care which of these courses they get invited to play.  It will just be a magical regional destination where glorious golf will be available in multiple locations and "sand hills" will mean a unique golf experience, not a specific course.
« Last Edit: September 28, 2005, 04:21:06 PM by RJ_Daley »
No actual golf rounds were ruined or delayed, nor golf rules broken, in the taking of any photographs that may be displayed by the above forum user.

A_Clay_Man

Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #64 on: September 28, 2005, 12:32:23 PM »
Huck- There has to more than two holes at SH where the teeing ground is elevated to the fairway, and everything is somewhat visible???
Adam I respect Tom's work as much as any on here but there is no guarantee that he will be able to make Ballyneal an equal much less better course. I do not think he will be able too but time will tell.

J.B With all due respect for your opinion, I find it hard to believe, anyone who is called a boy genius at the age of 44, will fail at anything.

So, where do you come by your prognosticating skills?
 
And, I have to ask because this is not the first time you have come on here and dissed Ballyneal. Didn't your upbringing include the motto of; if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything? Or is it the depression you are in that has you feeling feisty?
« Last Edit: September 28, 2005, 12:37:17 PM by Adam Clayman »

Josh_Mahar

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #65 on: September 28, 2005, 12:49:52 PM »
Dick, very well said about how prairie golf (wherever it might be) will be perceived in the future.
 Interestingly someone else mentioned that the experience at SH could not be matched at WH, but the golf was similar.  I have always thought that SH has gotten a lot of miles out of its "experience". The long journey, the isolation, the cluhouse and lodging atmosphere all give SH a wonderful "feel" no doubt.  Does that factor into its high regard?  How much does the "experience" factor into a golf clubs' rating or critique.
Put WH holes in SH setting??  Is it as good then??  
Now before someone calls me out for being a homer by claiming WH might be as good as SH, I will say I don't believe that and have several reasons why- purely from the golf standpoint.  I am just interested in how much weight is put into a golf clubs setting and atmosphere  vs. golf holes themselves by you guys.

Doug Sobieski

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #66 on: September 28, 2005, 12:52:32 PM »


Isn't "ease of walking" one of Golfweek's rating criteria ?


Patrick:

No. The category is the "Walk in the park" test, which is in essence the extent to which it's worth spending 4 hours on the course as a compelling outdoor experience.

I agree with you on your view of Sand Hills vs. Wild Horse in terms of walking. If I had to play Wild Horse every day, I wouldn't get tired of walking it, but I couldn't say the same for Sand Hills. And for several weeks after my visit to Sand Hills, my shins looked like I'd been walking through the jungle. So not only are many of the green to tee walks more difficult, but it can be painful!!! :(

Also, I had a couple beers with Justin White one evening, and Justin mentioned that when he came on board, there were no paths mowed through the rough. However, Cameron indicated that they had done that previously (simply a guy walking with a string trimmer). It sounded like it might be something that they undertake again in the future.

Regards,

Doug

Geoffrey Childs

Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #67 on: September 28, 2005, 12:58:07 PM »
Golf at Sand Hills is like being transported to another planet where the terrain literally untouched by man's hand is perfect for the game.  It is a place where you must use your wits to work with and overcome nature to successfully traverse the challenges of the course.

48 words

THuckaby2

Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #68 on: September 28, 2005, 01:12:45 PM »
Huck- There has to more than two holes at SH where the teeing ground is elevated to the fairway, and everything is somewhat visible???

Yes - several additional holes are like that, where the ground falls away.  But they are not "raised" and you initially raised the issue (pun intented) in the context of how it effects walking.  The point is, it has no negative effect, except on 2 and the now defunct 17.

Now as for this being some soon-to-be-archaic design flaw, well that's for time to tell.  We'll see.

Doug:

Would you say the walks at the two courses are "night and day" different, as Patrick initially maintained?  That I don't see.  I see them as both not all that bad.  SH is a little more strenuous true, and could be a lot more strenuous if one chases every foul ball.  In any case somehow downgrading Sand Hills because it's a tough walk just doesn't fly for me... good lord if you do that then Pasatiempo and each course at Bandon doesn't belong on the map.

 ;)

Geoffrey Childs

Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #69 on: September 28, 2005, 01:14:43 PM »
Compare the walks at Hidden Creek to the walks at Sand Hills.


Homie Mucci  ;D

It is the land at Sand Hills and Friars Head for that matter that puts those courses within a different universe on the scale of great and memorable venues with Hidden Creek.

Now I am a convert towards the MANY merits of Hidden Creek that make it one of the best modern golf courses in the US. However, if you want to put somewhat flat easy walks as a hallmark for a great experience then the list is vast form local munis to Talking Stick's two fine courses. The list of venues like Sand Hills ends at ONE.
« Last Edit: September 28, 2005, 01:16:01 PM by Geoffrey Childs »

THuckaby2

Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #70 on: September 28, 2005, 01:18:50 PM »
Wait just a second....

hold on and help me out....

LSU L-O-S-T that game??

Geez, I channel surfed it by accident (I didn't know it was on) and the score was 21-0 midway in the 3rd quarter and LSU had the ball...

what the hell happened??

One hell of a comeback by the Vols, that's what.
You should have stuck with it, it was a GREAT game.  One could just see the momentum shift... it was all TN from mid 3rd quarter on.


Doug Sobieski

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #71 on: September 28, 2005, 02:46:08 PM »

Doug:

Would you say the walks at the two courses are "night and day" different, as Patrick initially maintained?  That I don't see.  I see them as both not all that bad.  SH is a little more strenuous true, and could be a lot more strenuous if one chases every foul ball.  In any case somehow downgrading Sand Hills because it's a tough walk just doesn't fly for me... good lord if you do that then Pasatiempo and each course at Bandon doesn't belong on the map.

 ;)

How about if I call the difference "Day and Dusk"? For me, at WH the walk itself was very pleasant, while at Sand Hills it was quite a bit more noticeable as a factor. The first day at SH, we were the ONLY group that day to walk 36 holes. Why weren't there more people walking?
« Last Edit: September 28, 2005, 02:47:34 PM by Doug Sobieski »

THuckaby2

Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #72 on: September 28, 2005, 02:52:51 PM »
I'd prefer dusk and darkness.

 ;D

I didn't find the walk at WH to be all that easy at all... it is flat but there are a few long jaunts from green to tee.  Also the section from 10-12 will get your heart pumping.

But neither of these courses comes close to the difficulty of the walk at Pasatiempo, or Cinnabar Hills near me, or San Jose CC, or Summitpointe, or many many other truly hilly courses I frequent.  That's why this whole issue is kinda weird for me.

In any case why don't people walk the full 36 at SH?  Because it's just simpler and easier to jump in a cart for the 2nd round.  I've done it both ways... the full walk is a tough chore for sure.  But heck, walking 36 ANYWHERE isn't gonna be easy.

« Last Edit: September 28, 2005, 02:54:24 PM by Tom Huckaby »

Kevin_Reilly

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #73 on: September 28, 2005, 03:42:32 PM »

In any case why don't people walk the full 36 at SH?  Because it's just simpler and easier to jump in a cart for the 2nd round.  I've done it both ways... the full walk is a tough chore for sure.  But heck, walking 36 ANYWHERE isn't gonna be easy.

There is a self-perpetuating nature to this...for the second round, many will choose carts because 1) they are weary after walking 18 already, or  2) they took a cart for the first 18 so naturally will do so for the second, or  3) they need to play faster so they can get a full second 18 in, or 4) they are afraid of being caught out on hole 15 or 16 when darkness comes...easier to get back to civilization with a lighted cart.

Given all of the above, many will ride carts for the second 18.  Which leads to reason #5...given that most of the afternoon rounds are in carts, it is less enjoyable to walk when the group ahead and behind are in carts.  You feel rushed to keep up and stay ahead.  So instead of putting yourself in position to feel that way, you take a cart.
"GOLF COURSES SHOULD BE ENJOYED RATHER THAN RATED" - Tom Watson

THuckaby2

Re:Sand Hills: 50 words or less
« Reply #74 on: September 28, 2005, 03:48:06 PM »
Well said, Kevin - concur with all of that.

But why do so many players there tend to take carts for the FIRST round of the day?

That's the part I don't get.  You wanna talk something clearly night and day?  The course is way way way better walking.  You miss so much in a cart, as the paths necessarily go around the dunes...

TH