News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


J_ Crisham

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #25 on: December 09, 2007, 09:25:42 AM »
Jeff, I also thought Doonbeg was well designed. The short 14th was probably my favorite. I felt the course was challenging for the better player but playable for the average golfer.The out and back routing took advantage of the dunes and the green placements were well thought out. As an aside the proximity to Shannon allows one to easily play here on either an arrival or departure day.  

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #26 on: December 09, 2007, 09:51:29 AM »
Matt:

Of course every architect needs to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, but Norman's work is especially interesting because he has done some excellent courses, some complete disasters, and a lot of stuff that nobody pays any attention to at all.  It's a remarkable variety of results for one firm.  

I guess he has it broken down into two (or more) divisions and a lot of the variation comes from who exactly is overseeing the project -- but doesn't that imply the work is really not Greg's?

The wise Jim Urbina says that the hardest part of building a golf course is finishing.  Mr. Norman will never be remembered as a great finisher.

jeffwarne

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #27 on: December 09, 2007, 10:07:39 AM »
It killed me to watch Norman lose many of those majors.

While it is commonly thought that he had several majors stolen from him by fantastic "lucky" shots by others and "unlucky shots" by him (89 British Open), an even par back nine on the last day multiple times would've made those fantastic shots by others simple footnotes in distant seconds to Norman's win.

Nicklaus 30 on the back in 1986 was really the only one where a player was able to pass him without a Norman collapse (and he still bogied 18 from the fairway)

"Let's slow the damned greens down a bit, not take the character out of them." Tom Doak
"Take their focus off the grass and put it squarely on interesting golf." Don Mahaffey

Matt_Ward

Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #28 on: December 09, 2007, 02:56:14 PM »
Steve Shaffer:

As an FYI -- I have mentioned Red Sky Ranch many times here on GCA as a standout design from the ones I have played that bear his name. The price to play there isn't cheap and they do rotate the public access with the companion TF design that's also there and which is quite mundane. Norman did indeed excell at Red Sky Ranch -- arguably one of the 2-3 best public courses I have played in all of Colorado.

Pat Craig:

I hear what you say. But let's place that one time encounter you had w Norman in some sort of context. We are all human beings and I'm not here to say his reaction was unacceptable. However, there are plenty of people I have witnessed on the PGA Tour who have acted in any number of ways -- good, bad and somewhere in between.

I understand clearly that first impressions can often mean lasting ones. So be it.

However, the purpose of this site is to assess the man's designs. I'm sure people bumped into Tillinghast or Ross at times and the same things were uttered from their mouths on occasion. That's the price for being human. Just remember, I'm not sanctioning such outbursts.

You've articulated you have only played one Norman course and it stunk. I've kept what you said in mind -- try to realize and keep in mind what others -- myself included -- have said given the larger design portfolio of courses others have played.

Tom Doak:

When you categorize Norman's work it would be especially helpful for everyone -- yourself included -- to list those courses you have specifically played. Not from what others have said -- but from your own personal observations.

I never said Norman hits home runs with each of his designs. Guess what -- no one does as in all architects.

Norman did outstanding work at Red Sky Ranch in Wolcott, CO. I think it's a superb mountain course -- plenty of width to handle a wide extreme of players and enough elasticity in its design to give challenge to all skill levels. I have the same feeling sfor Doonbeg when I played there. Very enjoyable and quite fun to play -- IMHO, worthy of any person to play when visiting that part of Ireland.

I've also played other courses where the level of detail and design sophistication is much less. However, from the limited number of courses I have played that bear his name I have found them to be consistently higher than a number of other tour players who have jumped into the design arena.

Joel Stewart:

Thanks for the story on The Medalist -- try to remember what Pete Dye has done with Crooked Strick too! Likely with a bit of time I could list other examples of similar situations.

I like Doonbeg immensely -- if improvements were made then I don't see the issue. If in fact -- the reverse happened then that's something that needs to be examined -- in real detail.

Keep in mind this -- with each project the onus becomes more and more for Norman to demonstrate an ability to evolve his work and do show that he is learning from past situations. I'm curious to see future works -- like Cornerstone in CO sometime in '08 and see if that evolution is happening or not. We shall see.

jeffwarne:

You said, "How do you know I didn't choose option C?"

Simple solution. Why not just state your answer among the choices you provided instead of the quiz show process you followed?

You statements that followed in your longish retort was more straightforward and clearer. You said, "I was merely trying to say it would be unfair to judge a man who devotes a smaller percentage of his time to architecture than say Rees Jones, Tom  Fazio ,or Tom Doak,Bill Coore, Kelly Blake Moran ,Gil Hanse, Kelly Blake Moran and a host of other full time architects." I agree with that and I said that Norman when compared to other "tour" designers has done quite well for the limited number of designs that I have personally played. I am also aware of the disasters that others have mentioned and a few of the lesser products that I have personally played.

Jeff, you may have missed what I always say. No designer, even the preferred ones on this site -- hit home runs with each design. Some even do bomb jobs -- while I have not played Doral White I take your opinion on the course very seriously.

Ditto on the other experiences you mentioned.

Now try to take seriously the comments from others -- myself included. I really like a number of his other courses -- Red Sky Ranch, Doonbeg and TPC Sugarloaf come quickly to mind. I also like Wente Vineyards in CA but not at the same level as the first three.

Jeff, enough of the "world's not fair" sermon. Breaks and connections are a part of life. No doubt about that. I enjoy the success stories of plenty of people who don't have a high profile and have mentioned many times those names here and elsewhere. Norman has an ego the size of the parade balloons that you see on Thanksgiving Day in the NYC parade. No dount on that front. Just to clue you in -- many architects also have egos -- some of them are quite large too.

The name "Norman" is a branding concept to capture attention of people through a wide variety of products. Designing courses is part of that effort. I never said what the guy designs is all dog food -- some have. I've tried to place the debate in some sort of context and have cited enough personal examples to show otherwise.

You are free to play what you want and see him in whatever light you care to show. I'm just as free to comment when I believe the written record needs to reflect the flip side when merited. Norman is a smart businessman and likely realizes that his continuation in the field will only increase if he is sensitive to the many needs he must accomodate.

I consider his development to be a mix bag but I have seen clear instances where he has put forward a solid effort.







jim_lewis

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #29 on: December 09, 2007, 03:55:53 PM »
I think I have told this story here before, but may be worth repeating. I heard it from a friend who was an early member at TPC Sugarloaf. I was told that Greg visited the site more than 20 times. On the Monday morning after he blew the 1996 Masters, he was on-site at Sugarloaf. In the same situation I think I would have spent the day in bed, drunk with a revolver by my side.

That is a sample of only one, but my impression is that Greg is more serious about becoming a legitimate  designer than most of the touring pros who make that claim.

I just added them up and realized that I have played 6 of his courses.(Sugarloaf, Barefoot Landing, The Reserve, River Club, The Point lake & GC, and Landsdown Resort). My only real disappointment was Landsdown. TPC Sugarloaf was my favorite followed by the River Club. I am reluctant to generalize based on only 6 courses, but I have seen some features that I like. I like his occasional use of no long-grass rough. It really introduces some skill shots and decisions that players don't encounter very often. Also, I enjoy his frequent use of stacked-sod bunkering. Most of the courses I have seen have excellent and challenging green complexes, even Landsdown.

Many of the great players have tried to become course designers. Player and Palmer were pretenders. Nicklaus, Love and Crenshaw have worked at it. I put Norman in the latter group.

Jim Lewis
"Crusty"  Jim
Freelance Curmudgeon

Matt_Cohn

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #30 on: December 09, 2007, 04:33:13 PM »
The ones I've played:

Wente Vineyards, CA: I enjoy it very much, and it's also the hardest course I've ever played, I think. A significant number of legitimately creative and intersting holes. Only weakness would be that there's not a lot of variety/choices from the tees. They tend to all be drivers, straight ahead, with vineyards/other trouble on both sides.

Sanctuary Lakes, VIC, Australia: A terrible piece of land. Tough to blame him for a completely uninteresting course here.

The Moonah Course, VIC: The most "Greg Normanish" of the three I've played. Very tough, lots of movement, great use of the land, lots of short grass and contouring, a distinctive look, and altogether a whole lot of fun to play.

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #31 on: December 09, 2007, 05:35:33 PM »
Matt:

I've played The Medalist (when it was brand new) and National GC in Australia (Moonah course) and walked Doonbeg before it was open.  I think those are the only ones, but I might be forgetting one or two.  In most quarters those are thought to be Norman's best courses [except for the ultra-private Ellerston], and I found them very uneven.

Medalist has been changed many times since it opened, as has Doonbeg.  I haven't seen any of those changes, but the general consensus seems to be Medalist has gotten worse while Doonbeg has been greatly improved.  Again, that goes to my point about "finishing".

I don't have the time or inclination to go and see the "B" courses in other designers' portfolios; I'd rather work on improving my own.  I'm happy to take others' word that there is nothing for me to see there.

By the way, Matt, you haven't listed many of the Norman courses you've seen, either.  You have talked about Red Sky Ranch many times, but you only mentioned a couple of others by name and referred vaguely to "others where the level of design detail and sophistication is much less".  I can understand why you might not want to ennumerate those, so how about cutting me the same level of slack?

PCCraig

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #32 on: December 09, 2007, 05:51:26 PM »
Hi Matt W,

 I hardly want anyone to think that I have a personal vendetta against Greg Norman...as a person or an architect! I was only telling a story of my only personal experience of him. However for someone like Norman who has always prided himself on being just as much as a businessman as he was a golfer, you would think he would know enough that a young fan can one day have purchasing power of his own.

As to your extensive experience playing GN courses versus my own limited experience I have yet to read anything on this board that would make me want to seek out any of his courses. And its unlikely that I ever will.
H.P.S.

jeffwarne

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #33 on: December 09, 2007, 06:02:43 PM »
Matt,
Exactly where did I not take comments of yours and others about Norman's courses seriously?
I'm sure most have seen more of his courses than I have -turns out it's five. And I gave high marks to one.

To paraphrase your comment, am I supposed to give Norman a pass because most of the courses done by tour players aren't very good?
I wouldn't know because I would avoid most like the plague.
Remember, I'm not in the heavy lifting business, so I get to play the courses I want.

We both agree he's a brand-evidently developers hire his services in hopes that the brand will sell real estate or whatever else the developer is hoping to sell .

I never lectured about Norman unduly using connections  or being lucky. He made his luck )both good and bad) and he made his connections through hard work and determination..
iImerely pointd to that as a possible reason/catalyst for his well deserved business success.

There are too many great/good courses to seek out a course designed by a brand. I'm sorry I got on this rant as I really admire Greg Norman. I'd just rather play a course by James Braid.
"Let's slow the damned greens down a bit, not take the character out of them." Tom Doak
"Take their focus off the grass and put it squarely on interesting golf." Don Mahaffey

Randy Thompson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #34 on: December 09, 2007, 06:12:42 PM »
Andrew,
 When Dye and Norman worked together on Medalist, Norman decided to go heavy after the US market and hired Jason McCoy to over see his US designs. Jason started working for Pete at PGA West and his last project with Pete before Medalist was Kiawa(sp?). I am  not sure if he is still running things or not.  

Anthony Butler

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #35 on: December 09, 2007, 07:14:10 PM »
Matt:

I've played The Medalist (when it was brand new) and National GC in Australia (Moonah course) and walked Doonbeg before it was open.  I think those are the only ones, but I might be forgetting one or two.  In most quarters those are thought to be Norman's best courses [except for the ultra-private Ellerston], and I found them very uneven.

Tom–You never mentioned your opinion of Moonah National. I think it is a really good course on a piece of land that is somewhat overrated due to its seaside location. I'm hoping to make it down to St. Andrews Beach next year to see what Doak/Clayton have done in a similar geographic area... of course the club might be "finished" by then. ;)
Next!

Jeff_Mingay

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #36 on: December 09, 2007, 09:29:46 PM »
All I can add is, after watching whatever tournament it is Norman was apparently hosting at Tiburon in Florida, on television today, I was somewhat intrigued by his course there. It certainly appears much different than most courses seen, week after week, during televised PGA Tour events.  
jeffmingay.com

Mike_Cirba

Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #37 on: December 09, 2007, 09:42:06 PM »
I've only played two of Norman's courses and those include his course at Barefoot Landing, which I liked quite a bit and more than others seem to, although I played it pre-housing-construction, which may account for some of the difference.

I've also played his course at Lansdowne which is a train-wreck that should have never been built if they weren't going to give him any more land than about 300 yards of swampy width for the entire property.

Kyle Henderson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #38 on: December 10, 2007, 12:36:08 AM »
The ones I've played:

Wente Vineyards, CA: I enjoy it very much, and it's also the hardest course I've ever played, I think. A significant number of legitimately creative and intersting holes. Only weakness would be that there's not a lot of variety/choices from the tees. They tend to all be drivers, straight ahead, with vineyards/other trouble on both sides.


Wente is my only "Norman experience," and it is pretty difficult from the tips -- especially when the wind is up. Before the Nationwide Tour made it a tournament stop, it was much easier (short rough, wide fairway cuts, less length from the tips) and it's still reasonable from the blues and whites.

I think it's a fun representation of how one might "channel" Mackenzie's style.

What really impressed me was the number of quality holes on such a difficult site. Granted, it is power cart golf and it does have a 250-foot climb to the 10th tee. ::) But that is waht the site required.
"I always knew terrorists hated us for our freedom. Now they love us for our bondage." -- Stephen T. Colbert discusses the popularity of '50 Shades of Grey' at Gitmo

Andrew Summerell

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #39 on: December 10, 2007, 05:10:37 AM »
Andrew,
 When Dye and Norman worked together on Medalist, Norman decided to go heavy after the US market and hired Jason McCoy to over see his US designs. Jason started working for Pete at PGA West and his last project with Pete before Medalist was Kiawa(sp?). I am  not sure if he is still running things or not.  

Thanks for the reply, Randy.

Steve_ Shaffer

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #40 on: December 10, 2007, 08:21:46 AM »
I haven't heard much about the other Dye/Norman collaboration- Tuscany Reserve in Naples, FL. Anyone play there? It's been open about 2 years. Here's a description from www.shark.com:


"Tuscany Reserve measures over 7,200 yards in length from the back tees and features Sea Dwarf Paspalum throughout. The championship course is highlighted with cross bunkers and interwoven along terraced hillsides with watercourses slowly spilling over aging stone walls into narrow finger-lakes and channels. A picturesque farm-like landscape allows for a variety of uphill and downhill holes, while providing images of a course that could easily be set in the picturesque valleys of Tuscany, Italy.

In the tradition of older designs such as the Commonwealth Golf Club in Melbourne Australia, high-backed bunkers guard the greens, allowing the long hitter to think twice about club selection. The front nine resembles open and rolling parkland with widely scattered trees and ending with a descending par-4 to a peninsula green. The 9th tee is cut high into a terraced hillside providing sweeping views. The back nine is distinctly representative of Italy's rural farmland, providing a strong contrast to the earlier park-like holes."
« Last Edit: December 10, 2007, 08:22:19 AM by Steve_ Shaffer »
"Some of us worship in churches, some in synagogues, some on golf courses ... "  Adlai Stevenson
Hyman Roth to Michael Corleone: "We're bigger than US Steel."
Ben Hogan “The most important shot in golf is the next one”

Philippe Binette

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #41 on: December 10, 2007, 08:38:04 AM »
I remember watching the shell wonderful world Price vs Norman at Medalist in the mid 90... look hard as hell

good thing it was two of the best drivers in history playing, if not they would have never finished

Walt_Cutshall

Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #42 on: December 10, 2007, 09:13:34 AM »
The Norman courses I've played could be described in a single word: unremarkable. They lack the inspiration and creative touches that separate the great golf courses from all the others.

As for Norman the person, he strikes me as someone who is insecure at the very core. Too bad, since he was a great player and has amassed a fortune as a business man.

Jeff Spittel

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #43 on: December 10, 2007, 10:11:04 AM »
My only exposure to his design is at Meadowbrook Farms in Houston. Considering the relatively featureless land that he had to work with, I think he did a reasonable job with the course.

I rather enjoyed the closely mown chipping areas and stacked sod bunkers. If nothing else, his design provided a good challenge.  
Fare and be well now, let your life proceed by its own design.

Nick Church

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #44 on: December 10, 2007, 11:21:41 AM »
I played the International Course at ChampionsGate back in 2000.

At the time, that was a radical departure in any course I'd ever seen.  

I thoroughly enjoyed the course.  I distinctly remember laughing (almost giggling) at how different the shots were around the green.  I'd never had the opportunity to play shots across such wavy ground.

Now, in the years since, I've learned more about minimalist design.  I've yet to play Doak, Hanse, Kidd, et al.  This past spring, I played the Saguaro @ We Ko Pa.  In comparison, I cannot say that it blew away ChampionsGate.  I had just as an enjoyable experience at both courses.

Norman opened Tennessee National.  I'd be interested in that course based on the bunker style (stacked sod) that he used.  Another course opening near Nashville in a couple of years.

ed_getka

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #45 on: December 10, 2007, 02:54:53 PM »
I have played two "Norman's": Wente Vineyards and National Moonah. Wente is a solid test of golf. A few have mentioned the site, which in a few places is  pretty severe, but I think that only resulted in 1 or 2 holes which are basically just getting you to the next hole. So I would expect the other 16 holes should be pretty good, and about half are I would estimate. To me the green end just isn't that interesting  on most holes. I only played the course once and felt it was overpriced, so I haven't been tempted to play it again. I did go out there with my sons for the Nationwide event  to see if perhaps my memory was faulty, but watching the short game shots and putts those guys had just reaffirmed what I thought in the first place. Most  of the challenge is getting to the green. The bunkering is fine. The greens just weren't that interesting.
   On the other hand National Moonah was the surprise unexpected pleasure of the trip. This apparently has a lot to do with Bob Harrison's input from what I've been told. Just driving up to the course gives you the Sand Hills feel where it just seems like ideal golfing country stretching out in the distance.
    The course had MUCH more interesting greens than Wente, the shots on  most holes didn't seem quite so difficult (until the final stretch), so the balance of the various shot requirements  seemed better to me.
    The main reason we went to the course was to meet some more GCAers  and it was right next door practically to St Andrews Beach. The course had some decent recommendations from the GCA'ers down there so I knew it would be okay, but as I said it turned out to be better than expected.
    The finishing stretch includes a brutal 4 hole stretch that ate my lunch, but I really enjoyed the challenge of those holes and didn't feel like they were impossible, I just needed to think my way around better.
     
"Perimeter-weighted fairways", The best euphemism for containment mounding I've ever heard.

John Foley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #46 on: December 10, 2007, 03:28:35 PM »
The Norman courses I've played could be described in a single word: unremarkable. They lack the inspiration and creative touches that separate the great golf courses from all the others.

As for Norman the person, he strikes me as someone who is insecure at the very core. Too bad, since he was a great player and has amassed a fortune as a business man.

Greg Norman - insecure???

Come on.

He may be alot of things, but insecure is probably waaaaay down on the list.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2007, 03:32:06 PM by john_foley »
Integrity in the moment of choice

John Foley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #47 on: December 10, 2007, 03:31:43 PM »
Hey Ed - Hope all is we'll

I've always wondered why the Moonah course doesn't get much love. Never been, but from the photo's it appears to be cool. Glad to hear your. One thing I remeber is that it was done mainly by his man in AUS/NZ (Bob Harrison??) who was well thought of.

Their was a video done on the making of which was prety interest.
Integrity in the moment of choice

Andrew Summerell

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #48 on: December 10, 2007, 08:24:32 PM »
I've always wondered why the Moonah course doesn't get much love.

John,

You may be confusing National Moonah with Moonah Links.

Moonah Links is a Thomson course that has held the Australian Open a few times, but is an ordinary course.

National Moonah is the Harrison/Norman course at The National club, which has 3 courses - The Old, The Ocean & The Moonah. The Moonah is a lovely course.

Matt_Ward

Re:Greg Norman
« Reply #49 on: December 11, 2007, 10:55:45 AM »
Tom Doak:

Fair enough.

Here is complete Norman listing to date.

Red Sky Ranch / Norman Course (CO)
Wente Vineyard (CA)
Barefoot Resort & Golf (SC)
Doonbeg (Ireland)
Norman Course at PGA West (CA)
TPC Sugarloaf (GA)
Norman Course at Lansdowne (VA)

Tom, help me out here -- you say Norman has a problem "finishing" a course but you cite exactly only one example (Medalist). I'm happy to cut you slack but how about you highlight the fact that tagging a person with such a statement through only one clear example is a bit of a stretch. I'm not suggesting Norman doesn't have lemons in his design closet but it would be helpful for you to personally play a few others before leaping to that conclusion.

When you say you'll take the words of other -- that's fine. I can say this though -- I do my own homework and depend less on others although I do appreciate their take. I don't simply make an assumption that what is said by others bears out 100% of the time. I try to avoid tagging a person's portfolio until I play representative sampling. If you and others feel otherwise so be it.