First of all, a big thanks to Brad Klein for the all the work he does to put together the lists. I think the Golfweek ratings are the best representation of great courses among the major publications. Great job, Brad.
Regarding Ballyneal's debut at #43: The turf was barely mature enough for golf last year. There were some bare spots in the fairways. In addition, the greens were unusually slow for much of the year, which had to detract from the playing experience. We expect the course conditions to be much better this year, with second year grass and a few adjustments to the irrigation system. So, many of Golfweek's "early adopters" saw the course before optimal playing conditions were possible. Conditioning matters.
I think Ballyneal is ranked too low. The course compares favorably with the top 25 courses. It is a unusually consistent layout, with 18 good holes, and a few special holes, like the 12th.
My first thought about Augusta is the quality of the courses now ahead of it. They all look pretty good to me. Perhaps a change in tastes is happening.
Engineers clearly deserved the recognition. Great place.
Some may have noticed Stone Eagle didn't make the modern list. I can't help believing the raters who participated in the King's Putter, who saw the course for the first time on a 110 degree afternoon, after already playing 18 holes, rated the course lower than they would have if they played it during high season. I love the place; it is strikingly beautiful, especially in the afternoons. Fun to play, too!