News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


SPDB

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #25 on: February 29, 2004, 07:27:06 PM »
Hunt - to post this image, you need to

1. get rid of the first / before the first bracketed IMG

2. move the last / to just inside the closing bracketed IMG.

voila




Quote
« Last Edit: February 29, 2004, 07:29:20 PM by SPDB »

Tiger_Bernhardt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #26 on: February 29, 2004, 08:16:25 PM »
I still feel the 16th at North Berwick is a great example.

Top100Guru

Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #27 on: March 01, 2004, 07:20:58 PM »
#5 at Mountain Lake is said to be the original style that Raynor employed there and that Silva merely recreated it.

Gerry B

Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #28 on: March 01, 2004, 10:13:31 PM »
Both times I have played Yale the pin was located at the rear of the Biarritz(so much for the percentages. The best Biarritz hole that I have played - bar none. Have not played St. Louis or Piping Rock.The 5th at Fishers Island - while the swale is in front of the green complex, it adds to the magic of the hole if one ends up short of the green and the pin is in the front, however it is really about the tee shot -220 yards from the tips uphill -reminds me of the 2nd par 3 on the front nine at Pine Valley in terms of  shot value- especially if one is playing into the wind. The last 4 times I played Chicago -the approach to the green was mowed to allow the old knock down run up shot. Shoreacres' Biarritz is all about the pin placement. I have played it at 170 yards and 235 yards - 2 different golf holes in my opinion because of the length differential. Have never played the hole when the pin was in the middle of the swale.  

Question: Is the original hole at Golf Club de Biarritz still there? I have a friend that lrecently moved from London to Biarritz - but he does not play golf - I asked him about the course and the hole and he thought I was from another planet!!!!

George_Bahto

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #29 on: March 02, 2004, 12:27:16 AM »
Gerry B: the hole is no longer at Biarritz France - had a friend there last year and had him loaded with questions to get answers for ......... nothing even in the area of the original hole .... just housing

Hey Jeff - so your down there with Peter ??? cool - I'll be coming down in  a couple months I think and will certainly stop by .....

about Yeamans Biarritz and most others ....

even though the Raynor drawing at Yeamans Hall and other courses ALL show what might be interpreted as the "so-called" double green-look, they were not built that way .... except perhaps Yale and one other.

However I love the dramatic the "double green" effect.

The side bunkering, often removed, is a much needed feature - this bunkering was meant to have you "confined" into the narrow, hard surface approach "fairway" (or "fairgreen" as was usually written on their plans). Miss the approach (Macdonald called this area a "HOG'S-BACK" area and there were originally a couple of spines running thru here that were meant to shunt you off into the side bunkering   ......   a bumpy approach ground game!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Take this concepts one step further .....  there were these deflection mounds on the front "fairway" area - so how could you "pin" there?

remember the basic Macdonald and Raynor par-3 concept .....  a wonderful balance of one shot holes:

Short one shotter: the Short   .....  135 - 145 yds

Medium one shotter: the Eden .....   160 - 175 yds

Long one shotter: Redan   ............  185- 200 yds

Unreachable, on the fly, one shotter    usually just flat-out 235 yds ...........  pin in the back - NOT in the front or in the swale

if you want to put it there ...... hey, go ahead!!  

why have a hole at 235-245 yds? .....  for variety?? doesn't make sense to me ... ...... variety?? that's why you have the other par-3s at the various lengths

i don't get the discussion ................   I'm sure Yale just evolved into putting the pin up front .... remember it was mostly for the students ........... (perhaps too good a golf hole (originally) for that type course) but how could Raynor ignore the topo ...

here's one for you .....   if you look closely at the Yale drawing in Scotland's Guilt - Kolff (hah) you will see that the Redan and Biarritz locations were switched when built ..... Raynor/Macdonald probably saw the higher "perch" of the tee box and decided it would be better with the higher tee-box on the Biarritz hole.

So now you want to "modernize" this entire concept?? well then why are you thinking Macdonald and Rayor - this is now YOUR concept, not theirs
If a player insists on playing his maximum power on his tee-shot, it is not the architect's intention to allow him an overly wide target to hit to but rather should be allowed this privilege of maximum power except under conditions of exceptional skill.
   Wethered & Simpson

Keith Durrant

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #30 on: March 06, 2004, 01:38:31 PM »
Is this the original course, designed by Dunn of Shinnecock fame? Was the hole on this course or another course?

http://www.touradour.com/golf/phare/phargolf.htm

George_Bahto

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #31 on: March 06, 2004, 03:12:38 PM »
rottcott: yes, it was on the Biarritz la Phare course but the hole (the 3rd hole - "Chasm") is no longer there
If a player insists on playing his maximum power on his tee-shot, it is not the architect's intention to allow him an overly wide target to hit to but rather should be allowed this privilege of maximum power except under conditions of exceptional skill.
   Wethered & Simpson

George_Bahto

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #32 on: March 06, 2004, 03:13:32 PM »
sorry - that's   rottcodd !!
If a player insists on playing his maximum power on his tee-shot, it is not the architect's intention to allow him an overly wide target to hit to but rather should be allowed this privilege of maximum power except under conditions of exceptional skill.
   Wethered & Simpson

JDoyle

Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #33 on: March 06, 2004, 05:54:34 PM »
Here is the Biarritz 5th Hole at Fishers Island:




George Bahto - I am interested in your thoughts on this hole.  I was looking forward to seeing it after playing a few of Raynor's other Biarritz holes - Yale, Yeaman's.  But this one seems to have really lost most of it's front section.  Is this hole very different from when the course opened?  Does this hole still deserve the title "biarritz"?.....or perhaps it would need an overhaul to remain in the category?
« Last Edit: March 06, 2004, 06:02:52 PM by Jonathan Doyle »

George_Bahto

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #34 on: March 06, 2004, 10:48:25 PM »
Jonathan Doyle: I think you will change you mind about this when you see it and when you play it. It is one of the very good ones.

The setting is spectacular, of course. It plays very well also. I like the area betrween tee-box and the beginning of the front fairway section .... don't top the ball.

Don't miss to the right !!!!!

This was originally one of the shortest of Biarritz holes - without looking it up, I think it was a "flat-200-yards." A rear tee added makes it 220+ yards.

This one doesn't have to be the requisite 235-yards (more normal) mainly because of a couple things:

The wind is a major factor!!
You don't really want this hole too long because swings start getting a bit wilder and a slice here ..... in a single word: "Perdition"

This is one of my very favorites - all the above - plus it is not the "usual" ground-level variety.

I love the hole!
If a player insists on playing his maximum power on his tee-shot, it is not the architect's intention to allow him an overly wide target to hit to but rather should be allowed this privilege of maximum power except under conditions of exceptional skill.
   Wethered & Simpson

Gerry B

Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #35 on: March 07, 2004, 08:07:18 PM »


Jonathan:

I have to agree with George Bahto 100% re Fishers Island's 5th. The back tee box coupled with the potential wind, elevation change and the terrain to carry makes this one of the best. This hole also follows one of the best under 400 yard par 4 's you will ever play (an alps/punchbowl combo) and it still holds its own.

JDoyle

Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #36 on: March 07, 2004, 10:20:18 PM »
George & Gerry,

I think I am being vastly misunderstood.  Let me clear a couple things up.  First of all, I have played Fishers Island and with it the 5th hole - I took the photo I posted.  Secondly, I loved the course and consider it a personal favorite.  I think it offers some of America's best seaside golf.  In fact I consider the three hole stretch of 3-4-5 to be among the best I have ever played.

My only question was if the 5th hole is a pure Biarritz hole or something slightly different.  When I played the hole the green seemed smaller than perhaps originally designed - therefore I wanted to ask for George's opinion.  The front portion of the green seemed lost.

The 5th is a monster of a one-shooter.  Wind is a huge factor.  Plus from the back it's well over 200...probably 225.  Any mishit can easily result in a quick 5 or more.

Gerry - on the subject of the 4th - I personally think it belongs on a short list of great holes anywhere.

George - do you know if this hole has evolved over time or is it today as it was in Raynor's day?

jefffraim

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #37 on: March 07, 2004, 10:27:28 PM »
George:
I don't want to get into a fight with you but both of the old blueprints show the 16th green at Yeamans Hall as being at least 60-70 yards long. This would tell me that the green was at that point (1926) a full biarritz green.
Mr. Silva with whom I unfortunately am not a fan (I feel he puts his own "mark" on the "Seth Raynor" courses he re-designs) has a biarritz at the Everglades that is 32 yards from front to back with the swale incorporated into the green. Come on down and we'll talk about it.

As for TEPaul
Believe it or not I do know how you know that I was interested in golf course architecture. I know that the committee feels it has made the best descision for the club. Definitely, no hard feelings. I am a student of Seth Raynor designs and I love Donald Ross. I would absolutely love to see every golf course designed between 1890 to 1940 in it's original state. Even now a days. I look forward to chatting with you in the future.

jeff

Gerry B

Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #38 on: March 07, 2004, 10:36:25 PM »
Jonathan:

The swale is in front of the green as it is at Mid Ocean's 13th and Chicago's 3rd - unlike Shoreacres' 6th and Yale's 9th (to give 2 examples) where the swale is located within the green complex. I did not make the rules in respect to what qualifies as a true Biarritz hole but feel that Fishers' 5th should qualify.

George Bahto is the expert on this subject -and his book on CB MacDonald is wonderful by the way.
I agree with you about 3,4,5 -what a great run of 3 holes.And 2 is a pretty good Redan hole as well.

gerry

George_Bahto

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #39 on: March 07, 2004, 11:20:24 PM »
"...... both of the old blueprints show the 16th green at Yeamans Hall as being at least 60-70 yards long. This would tell me that the green was at that point (1926) a full Biarritz green."

Jeff, all the Raynor and Banks drawings of Biarritz holes were just like the ones at Yeamans Hall - I must have 40 of them around here - theirs, not mine.

The point is that they were representative of the overall green complex and may not mean the green was meant as putting surface for the entire 70+/- yards. The original drawing for Piping Rock is the same and it was not built as "entire putting green"

Regardless, I personally wish they were all full putting surfaces - they're beautiful like that.

I have seen (in drawings and in person) 4 different versions of Biarritz holes. The "odd-balls" were/are just a few.

A couple of examples (ignoring the "normal" style):

1. Single green versions are prevalant - these without indications of a "front section" ..........   Blind Brook - Otto Kahn's course and there are others. These are often mistaken for Eden holes.

2. Essex County CC in NJ has a downhill version with a diagonal crossbunker that ran (most of it still there) some 125-yards. The green is on a bit of an angle. right to left, length 235.

3. A real odd-ball, and a beauty, was the reversed horseshoe bunkering on Westhampton's 17th, now gone. The horseshoe encompassed the 70+/- yard area of the "green, although there is only a distinct single green (no swale).


Jonathan: What you see at F/Is is just as built! Again, although shorter (probably for the reasons I stated earlier) I think it is one of the finest examples.
If a player insists on playing his maximum power on his tee-shot, it is not the architect's intention to allow him an overly wide target to hit to but rather should be allowed this privilege of maximum power except under conditions of exceptional skill.
   Wethered & Simpson

Jim_Kennedy

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #40 on: March 08, 2004, 12:25:07 AM »
George,
Quote
2. Essex County CC in NJ has a downhill version with a diagonal crossbunker that ran (most of it still there) some 125-yards. The green is on a bit of an angle. right to left, length 235.

Didn't realize that, it's so different. Two great par 3's on that side. How did the two on the front come out?
"I never beat a well man in my life" - Harry Vardon

bill_k

Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #41 on: March 08, 2004, 08:59:35 AM »
jeffraim,

    I agree with you concerning Silva's work at Everglades. I started a thread concerning Silva's work there some time ago. I have not seen any original blueprints but I have seen an old aerial photo from the mid-70's. At that time #1 was considerably shorter and did not have a dogleg (I think it was a par 4 at the time) and the redan hole was not fronted by water as it is now. Also, there is no indication of a punchbowl green complex at the short eighth- nor of the Biarritz (although it might have disappeared by then). Looking at the aerial, it is difficult to tell where the replica holes fell-but after having played it and spent some time wandering around I was left with the impression that Silva' did not attempt to follow the original Raynor work to the letter. Then again, I have not seen any blueprints and have no idea what the course might have looked like originally. Everglades seems to me to be a Brian Silva "reinterpretation" of a Seth Raynor course-which left me feeling sort of "cheated"- as for Yeamans Hall I have seen the blueprints as well and agree that the 16th looks like a double green on paper but a quick look at the topography of the run-up area short of the green has always looked to me like it could never have been mowed as green-too much slope and I do not think there is any evidence the side bunkers extended too much(mabye a little bit)further forward than they do now. There is a great Biarritz at Shoreacres that was not originally a "full" green but has been restored as such-it works nicely in part because the topography (at least on that hole) is relatively flat and minimal earthmoving was required. I think Yeamans Hall's Biarritz most closely resembles Camargo's-which is mown as fairway in front-at least of the Raynor courses I have played.

RSLivingston_III

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #42 on: March 08, 2004, 10:12:10 AM »
Just to clarify a few things regarding play in the teens and twenties as viewed from the perspective of a single digit handicap through top amatuer or pro.
A 235 yard hole was typically a long Iron or wood shot for most of these players in the 20's and mostly a wood shot (brassie or spoon) in the teens. This based on no wind and the expected compensations if there is a wind.
A Push Shot was a shot that was created around the beginning of the century. Vardon was a big proponent of it and you can read about how to do the shot in his books. It was accomplished with a medium to long iron (usually about 24 degrees) and was designed as a down wind shot that would have the ball start out low, climb at the end and drop dead at the end. It required hitting a descending blow to impart significant backspin. The shot was probably used from 160-200 yards depending on the club used. A wood was not used.
Hope this helps.
R
"You need to start with the hickories as I truly believe it is hard to get inside the mind of the great architects from days gone by if one doesn't have any sense of how the equipment played way back when!"  
       Our Fearless Leader

Lester George

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #43 on: March 08, 2004, 11:06:15 AM »

Gents,

If you want to see the newly restored Biarritz at Cavalier Golf and Yacht, go to www.georgegolfdesign.com and look in our renovation section.  Most of the famour Banks, Raynor holes are in there.

Letser

Lester George

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #44 on: March 08, 2004, 11:11:15 AM »

Gents,

You can see the newly restored Biarritz at Cavalier Golf & Yacht on our website at www.georgegolfdesign.com along with other Banks and Raynor replicas.

Regards,

Letser

Lester George

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #45 on: March 08, 2004, 11:13:29 AM »

Now you all know why I left the technology industry.  I can't even type my own name and I post things twice because I'm not good at this.  Oh well......

LESTER


Steve_ Shaffer

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #46 on: March 08, 2004, 11:26:57 AM »
I recently played a new course near Sarasota,FL- The Venetian Golf&River Club designed by Chip Powell-with a good Biarritz hole. Take a look at the 11th hole at:
www.powellgolf.com

Steve
"Some of us worship in churches, some in synagogues, some on golf courses ... "  Adlai Stevenson
Hyman Roth to Michael Corleone: "We're bigger than US Steel."
Ben Hogan “The most important shot in golf is the next one”

ForkaB

Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #47 on: March 08, 2004, 12:41:17 PM »
http://www.ville-biarritz.fr/francais/cgi-bin/sport_golf_phare.asp

The link above should get you to a more detailed description of golf at Biarritz.  Most importantly, the photo on the home page shows where the original "Chasm" hole existed (it is the 200 yard+ the carry over the inlet of the ocean towards the condos at the top of the photo).  I think this routing is true, and if so seems to imply that CPC #16 might be the original US "Biarritz, and maybe, just maybe, there is some credence to the conspiracy theory espoused on here by me and Tommy Naccarato to the effect that Marion H and Alister MacK stole Seth Raynor's hidden plans for that great course........

Paul Richards

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #48 on: March 09, 2004, 10:25:24 PM »
Having played many of Raynor's offerings, I would have to say the best Biarritz is at Yale. ;)
"Something has to change, otherwise the never-ending arms race that benefits only a few manufacturers will continue to lead to longer courses, narrower fairways, smaller greens, more rough, more expensive rounds, and other mechanisms that will leave golf's future in doubt." -  TFOG

Top100Guru

Re:Biarritz Holes
« Reply #49 on: March 09, 2004, 11:27:41 PM »
I told you guys, the Biarritz at Mountain Lake (#5) is pretty darn good.......par there is a heck of a score, especially when the cup is back right....no margin for error.