News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Jamie_Duffner

Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #25 on: September 05, 2003, 11:28:57 AM »
That's it Huckaby, the gloves are coming off, them fighting words! :o

Fazio is USC - pretty, plastic, underachievers, flash in the pan, has a zillion reasons to be great, but continually disappoint!  Sure to follow up the Auburn win with some sort of silly loss.

Buffalo Bills = Rees Jones is great.



David Wigler

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #26 on: September 05, 2003, 11:45:22 AM »
Schmidtty,

Fair enough.  In the last 6 years, Michigan is 3-1 vs. Northwestern with 2 no plays.  If you go to 8 years it is tied 3-3.  Therefore, this year will be the tiebreaker and Northwestern has the advantage of hosting.  Being the sport that I am, I will not ask for points, even though these equals are at your home.  The bet is Dinner and golf at the course of the winners choosing upon the winners next visit!
And I took full blame then, and retain such now.  My utter ignorance in not trumpeting a course I have never seen remains inexcusable.
Tom Huckaby 2/24/04

David Wigler

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #27 on: September 05, 2003, 12:07:22 PM »
Dave,

You said we were equal.  I said Michigan was Raynor and Northwestern was Art Hills.  Equals would not whine about a bet.
And I took full blame then, and retain such now.  My utter ignorance in not trumpeting a course I have never seen remains inexcusable.
Tom Huckaby 2/24/04

THuckaby2

Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #28 on: September 05, 2003, 12:14:21 PM »
Well done, Jamie.  THAT is what I was looking for.  ;D ;D

Sick thing is I can't disagree with that assessment at all... even the part about a silly loss this year... all the tough games seem to be on the road.

That is, besides the October breather in Indiana.  Maybe that opponent will come within 30 this year.

TH

Darren_Kilfara

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #29 on: September 05, 2003, 12:21:27 PM »
Y'know, I was enjoying this thread up until I remembered that college football fans are the most myopic sports fans in America. Therefore, I hereby nominate H.C. Leeds, designer of the Myopia Hunt Club, as the architect to represent Michigan, Northwestern and every other school in the Big Ten and beyond with supporters like those in this thread...  ;)

Cheers,
Darren

HamiltonBHearst

Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #30 on: September 05, 2003, 01:09:54 PM »
I would nominate Notre Dame football being like Rees jones.  Some major success, some disappointments, varying opinions on the material in which to work with, unending and needless hostility and bias toward, and always conducting themselves in a class manner. :)

THuckaby2

Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #31 on: September 05, 2003, 01:37:27 PM »
Oh please, now I am gonna vomit.  Hamilton, you better be an alum, because only an actual alum of the institution could believe that.

For every once of hostility and bias toward the domers, there is a pound FOR them.  Puh-leeze.  The bandwagoneering for Notre Dame is the most pure reason for intelligent sports fans to hate them!

I will say this:  their teams do generally conduct themselves in a class manner.  That is one of the very few positives for an institution given such most favored nation status that all it takes is 8 or 9 wins or whatever and it's automatic BCS bowl....

TH


JakaB

Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #32 on: September 05, 2003, 01:51:51 PM »
Tom Doak reminds me of the Red Grange era Fighting Illini....any other thoughts..

THuckaby2

Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #33 on: September 05, 2003, 01:57:29 PM »
That's a great one!

Jeff Brauer to me is Santa Clara (basketball) - great teams, not enough publicity, and when they finally get some the name is screwed up (he was Keffrey, we are often called UC Santa Clara).

Jeff, you have no idea what a compliment I just gave you.  Trust me, it is, whether it seems like an insult or not.

TH
SCU '85

Patrick_Mucci

Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #34 on: September 05, 2003, 02:08:21 PM »
Tom Huckaby,

How does ND"s difficulty of schedule ranking compare to others ?

Ken_Cotner

Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #35 on: September 05, 2003, 02:09:49 PM »
Whats really funny is that my son is currently thinking about attending Indiana University.

Good for him!  Mr. Wigler will be amazed that after 18 years of planning to attend the mighty U of M, I switched to Indiana at the last minute.  Got degrees from both IU and Northwestern.

That's right, 6 years of school, 2 degrees, and about 3 football wins total.  And the wins were all against each other.  I don't care if Northwestern or IU win national championships the next 5 years, they will always suck!

The most excruciating moment came when IU visited Ann Arbor my senior year.  I sat on the first row on the fifty yard line, and celebrated as we scored to tie the game with 30 seconds left.  Michigan throws 3 incomplete passes, then completes a 60 yard touchdown pass to Anthony Carter (40 yards of which was a run!) with no time left.

Every November while I was growing up, the Wolves would break my heart by losing a big game.  Then they break my heart by winning one!

Andy Hodson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #36 on: September 05, 2003, 02:12:55 PM »
Huck
Interesting thought about the Domers, and one I would whole heartedly agree with. But go to ESPN.com Page 2's poll question and the results would differ.

Its the media's love affair with ND that gags me.

Coore and Crenshaw are, of course, the Texas Longhorns. Because both's best efforts are of the timeless variety. We Horn fans vividly remember the '69 and '70 seasons like they were yesterday. Just ask us, we think we should be defending national champions every year, even though our last NC was 33 years ago.

Wait, maybe that makes us the Eddie Murphy of college football.


THuckaby2

Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #37 on: September 05, 2003, 02:17:18 PM »
Patrick:

I'm sure you know, you tell me.  

And you can do WAY better than this.  Very disappointing.

GO WASHINGTON STATE!!!

TH

THuckaby2

Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #38 on: September 05, 2003, 02:20:51 PM »
Huck
Interesting thought about the Domers, and one I would whole heartedly agree with. But go to ESPN.com Page 2's poll question and the results would differ.

Its the media's love affair with ND that gags me.

Well hush my mouth, right you are... I guess I am far from alone in my dislike for the Domers after all.  Or maybe us Notre Dame-haters are just more computer savvy than the fools who follow them?

Damn right re media, also.  Beano Cook makes me gag on a a regular basis.  I'm still waiting for the first of those four Heismans Pawlus was gonna win....

TH

Patrick_Mucci

Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #39 on: September 05, 2003, 02:30:17 PM »
Tom Huckaby,

Okay, how about,

Penis Envy is a terrible thing   ;D

Everybody wants ND's package  ;D

Is that better ?   ;D


THuckaby2

Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #40 on: September 05, 2003, 02:35:12 PM »
Patrick:

That's a little better.  Thanks.  Still very misguided and wrong, but as an alum you are entitled to these delusions.

Hmmm... if a package consisting of getting one's ass kicked 44-13 by one of your major rivals - and losing to every other decent team one plays - inspires envy, then I guess there is hope for all males...

GO WASHINGTON STATE!

TH

Patrick_Mucci

Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #41 on: September 05, 2003, 02:40:05 PM »
Tom Huckaby,

Could you review the won-lost record for the last ten (10) years with that major rival, just so I can put your comments in the proper context.



THuckaby2

Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #42 on: September 05, 2003, 02:45:40 PM »
Patrick:

Those with nothing to talk about currently do so love going back to the ancient past.  But hey, I can dig this.  5 seems like such a small number though.  How about 7?

In the meantime,

44-13.

And I look forward to more discussions of this come October.

BTW, can you refresh me on the current rankings in college football?  I seem to have forgotten.  My eyes glaze over after #4 or so.  Or since you're so into the past, maybe last year's rankings can be discussed also?

 ;D

TH

ps - hey, if the past is all that matters, note that my beloved Santa Clara has never lost to USC in football.  In fact we are 3-0 liftetime.  USC sucks!
« Last Edit: September 05, 2003, 02:50:39 PM by Tom Huckaby »

Tommy_Naccarato

Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #43 on: September 05, 2003, 03:50:14 PM »
Tom, Your sure quick to discount that record as ancient history, but the fact is that its bottom line--who has won, who has lost, and who has dominated. That ain't ancient history, its pure and simple fact.

RUDY-RUDY-RUDY!

« Last Edit: September 05, 2003, 03:50:38 PM by Tommy_Naccarato »

Tommy_Naccarato

Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #44 on: September 05, 2003, 03:53:32 PM »
Oh yes, I forgot to mention--42-27-5

That adds up to 15 years to try to catch-up. And on any given day..........

THuckaby2

Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #45 on: September 05, 2003, 03:58:18 PM »
Thomas:

The problem with the past is that one can so easily pick and choose how far back one wants to go.

44-13.

The current is so much more relevant than the past anyway

44-13.

BTW, Ever hear what Montana said about Rudy?

You don't want to know...

TH

ps - I loved that movie, even though I watched it with a bucket beside me to handle all the vomit from the ND-glorification.  Still, it was a great story.

HamiltonBHearst

Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #46 on: September 05, 2003, 04:16:11 PM »
Tom H. Are you aware that the ND quaterback got hurt early in the game last year?  this changed the offense and also made for a tired defense.  I will match not only Notre dames record against anyone, but would also like to point out that they win the right way with student athletes.

Tommy_Naccarato

Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #47 on: September 05, 2003, 04:17:33 PM »
Just like the bucket I use for evertime I have to hear about Santa Clara winning a volleyball title.......

Nice win. Someting to be very proud about!

Now do you want to hear something, I didn't know Santa Calra was a Jesuit school. Thanks for that info. I'll root for them next time they take the sand.

THuckaby2

Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #48 on: September 05, 2003, 05:00:06 PM »
Thomas:

Your ignorance regarding Santa Clara does not help your cause for other issues here.  And we just are nationally-ranked in volleyball, which is played indoors on hardwood, thank you very much.  It's SOCCER in which our little school defeated all the biggies and won a national championship recently... in fact we are pretty much without question the #1 soccer program in the nation when mens and women's are combined.

Of course, we also have football glory, and since you are so into the past, you ought to look it up.

The fascist NCAA with the rules changes prevents schools like ours from maintaing football programs these days.  You can research that a bit if you care to also.

In the meantime, I remain very proud of my alma mater.  

Are you an ND alum?  If so, you can pick on my alma mater.  If not, pipe down and stick to anti-USC comments.  At least then we have common ground, each rooting for a school we did not attend.   ;D ;D

Hamilton:

Yeah, having one of the other crappy QB's really would have changed things in last year's ass-kicking.  Keep telling yourself that.  It helps my case when I call ND fans "deluded."

TH

Patrick_Mucci

Re:Football Teams vs. Golf Architects
« Reply #49 on: September 05, 2003, 05:15:53 PM »
Tom Huckaby,

My roommate my Junior year was in the movie "RUDY".
I believe that he also wrote some of the screen play or story prior to Tri-Star's involvement.

Like Hoosiers, I enjoyed the movie.

Like a desperately confused castaway clinging to flotsam,
you cling to one score, one year.

I hope that you're not one of those golfers that clings to their only birdie in the last ten years, as if it signifies the substance and totality of their golfing career.

Here are few things that you'd probably like to forget.

ND's academic recruiting standards are high
ND's graduation rates for its scholar-athletes are very high
ND has a great tradition
ND has a great record
ND has a history of running a clean program
ND has no athletic dorms
ND's schedules are amongst the most difficult

Lastly, I didn't realize that they had awarded the National Championship this early in the season, who won it ?

I guess it's not just the shamrocks that are green.  ;D