-- I hate Florida golf!. It's the golf architecture -- or the sad lack thereof.
now that i have a current experience of NJ(architects GC(SAT 11/29)) and NY(siwanoy(FRI 11/28) and sprain lake(SUN 11/30)) golf - i feel better qualified to respond - but with a more philosophical approach to good v bad architecture
i am defining florida golf as "bad" architecture in your premise
i) i would rather play year round on a lesser recognized designed course than a only a few times a year on a more famous designed course - i want to play every week at least once and be able to WALK the course
ii)even famous designed courses - according to critics i have read - have "bad" holes (one example i can remember was about pebble beach as a course with many great, some good and a few mediocre holes)
iii)the architecture alone does NOT a fun / pleasant / good time / memorable round make - it is only a part of the experience for some and a non-issue for many and THE issue for only a few
iv)i have read many times the geography dictates to a large degree the potential - so if flat land is predominant what can be done ?
v)most of the truly "good" architecture are courses that are private - and inexcessable anyway - so eventhough i live in florida i may never play seminole nor do i pay more than $100 per round period which is what it would approximate to join the clubs near me - in other words lets just say for a moment florida architecture is "bad" and every other geographic location is "good" and "private" - i guess by definition i am along with most other golfers relegated to play only "bad" courses - as all the "good" are off limits to all but the members
vi)its not for lack of trying - no less than greg norman, nicklaus, palmer, world golf hall of fame etc have relatively recently(within the last twenty years) come to florida investing time money and resources - maybe florida is just low on the learning curve and will someday catch up - which is why i do not compare siwanoy (1901 donald ross / 1916 initial PGA wanamaker cup) with anything other that early 1900's architecture - much the same timeframes paintings, construction (bridges / buiding) architecture are aligned into when comparing those disciplines - i don't think this era is the "GOLDEN AGE" of golf
vii)the good v bad debate is ultimatley subjective and not solvable as neat as say a math equation - though i for one do appreciate a hole that has a multiple of options - to make you think (for example say a 400 yard hole with a creek across the fairway at about 220 to 230 - carry the creek and you got 160 - lay up and you got 190 - a drive of 220 to 230 in the creek you got a penalty stroke along with the 190)
viii)i seems you should either be hating "bad architecture" in florida or "florida" but i don't find the combination of the two particularly meaningful - is "bad" only in florida in your opinion - if not why hate only florida and not also "bad" in iowa or michigan or nevada or maine OR if you hate florida what difference does what it contains ("good" or "bad") make
i'm not looking to persuade you but i would suggest you read some Harvey Penick on the topics of golf being a privilage to play and not take it so cut and dry or black and white -
besides when i get bored on florida courses i simply take aim for the biggest picture window of the biggest most expensive house closest to the fairway or tee box (not hard to do on boca raton hotel CC or the presidential in hollywood) and that usually is enough to get my adrenilin back up