News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Rick Shefchik

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #100 on: September 21, 2004, 04:59:11 PM »
Like Seve, there is an intangible with Sergio that creates infectious excitement.  Of course, that is much easier done when playing well, but it sure was lacking in most of our leading boys.  Is making a big deal about Davis following the rules just a clear example of damnation by benign praise?  

Lou -- No, not when you offer the alternative of Seve Ballesteros. Seve was indeed a wonderful player and a compelling character, but is there anyone on this board that truly believes Seve would NOT have asked for relief in Love's situation?

Yes, it's unfair to judge a player by what he might or might not do in a hypothetical situation, but I think the point here is that Seve earned his reputation as the ultimate gamesman. He was as exciting as Love is dull, and as wily as Love is straightforward.

The guy you'd rather have a beer with is not necessarily the guy you'd expect to always uphold the spirit of the rules. Maybe that lonely guy in the corner deserves a little more respect.
« Last Edit: September 21, 2004, 05:12:40 PM by Rick Shefchik »
"Golf is 20 percent mechanics and technique. The other 80 percent is philosophy, humor, tragedy, romance, melodrama, companionship, camaraderie, cussedness and conversation." - Grantland Rice

rgkeller

Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #101 on: September 21, 2004, 05:08:17 PM »
Well, Seve and Sergio might have asked for relief if in the situation Love found himself, but, based on his actions at the Masters, it is a certainty that Ernie Els would have.

THuckaby2

Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #102 on: September 21, 2004, 05:30:43 PM »
It's a shame DL III can't invite Mr. Huckaby to ride on the back of his chopper as they go off for the first day of turkey hunting season - I think the dweeb remarks would end forever right then and there. ;)

I doubt it.  But it's likely he'd shoot me.  But maybe that's what you mean by the remarks ending forever?

 ;D

TEPaul

Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #103 on: September 21, 2004, 05:54:38 PM »
You're damn straight he'd shoot you! I can just see the turkey hunt now!

BAAAABOOOOM goes Davis's 8 gauge shot gun (not a gun for geeks, BTW!).

Davis: "Ah, gee I thought that (Huckaby) was a turkey---he sure looked like turkey, walked like a turkey and talked like a turkey. Are you sure that guy's not a turkey?"

Mike Benham

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #104 on: September 21, 2004, 06:36:42 PM »
You're damn straight he'd shoot you! I can just see the turkey hunt now!

BAAAABOOOOM goes Davis's 8 gauge shot gun (not a gun for geeks, BTW!).

Davis: "Ah, gee I thought that (Huckaby) was a turkey---he sure looked like turkey, walked like a turkey and talked like a turkey. Are you sure that guy's not a turkey?"

Whoa there pardner, how far was Davis' shot?  If it was like 4 or 5 feet away and under the extreme pressure of being with America's Guest, he probably would have missed ... ;)
« Last Edit: September 21, 2004, 06:36:59 PM by Mike Benham »
"... and I liked the guy ..."

A_Clay_Man

Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #105 on: September 21, 2004, 07:37:41 PM »
Maybe we can get Davis to forget the whole unfortunate incident?

I'd begin offering to change your internet handle to Turkaby, for eternity. To start.

THuckaby2

Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #106 on: September 22, 2004, 09:48:38 AM »
Maybe we can get Davis to forget the whole unfortunate incident?

I'd begin offering to change your internet handle to Turkaby, for eternity. To start.

Yeah right.  I'll do that if you take the CL off your last name and add a G.

 ;D ;D


A_Clay_Man

Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #107 on: September 22, 2004, 10:19:17 AM »
Yeah right.  I'll do that if you take the CL off your last name and add a G.

Sir Turkeyaby, I was not the one who foolishly held-on to a contrairian belief, then state it in public, because of someone else's love for Love.

Plus, I'm secure in my happy go lucky existence, to bear said monicker, if I had publicly called him that list of non-deplumes you did, and if he agreed that he wouldn't shoot me.  ;D

Lou_Duran

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #108 on: September 22, 2004, 10:21:51 AM »
Rick,

I did not bring up Seve in the context of Davis's decision not to take a drop that he was NOT entitled to.  I too would speculate that if Seve was in Davis's shoes, that he would have argued for a drop, particularly if he believed that he could execute the shot from the stance that he would have to take in order to receive relief under the rules.

My primary point was just reinforcing what a few others have said- that Davis's act deserved at most a mere mention and explanation and not an ongoing pat in the back.  That he got so much attention and praise for doing what any one of us who play the game is expected to do may also indicate that he is well liked and somewhat immune to critical analysis of his performance as a leading player.  I have to wonder that if it was Scott Hoch playing the ball as it lies, that we would have heard so much about sportsmanship and integrity.

In as far as giving Davis his due respect, I admire him greatly.  He is a wonderful player, and, quite apparently, a nice, likable human being.  I still would rather have Sergio as a partner covering my back in a four-ball.  And though I would love to have a beer with Davis, I doubt that he would consent happily, whereas I suspect that Sergio and many of his teamates would.

Really, how many of us didn't find the European's interaction with each other and the galleries refreshing?  I know that it is much easier to be friendly when things are going well, but that behavior started way before the official matches, and, in my opinion, it was genuine and not a small part of why the Euros kicked our ass.  
« Last Edit: September 22, 2004, 10:59:43 AM by Lou_Duran »

THuckaby2

Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #109 on: September 22, 2004, 10:28:05 AM »
Yeah right.  I'll do that if you take the CL off your last name and add a G.

Sir Turkeyaby, I was not the one who foolishly held-on to a contrairian belief, then state it in public, because of someone else's love for Love.

Plus, I'm secure in my happy go lucky existence, to bear said monicker, if I had publicly called him that list of non-deplumes you did, and if he agreed that he wouldn't shoot me.  ;D

OK Adam.  On that great day I go turkey hunting with Mr. Love, I shall accept that moniker, if it means I don't get shot.  Until such time, I shall stick with my own name, thank you very much.

I still don't like Davis Love.  I also feel confident he has better things to do than to read this forum, or care about what a dweeb like me says.   ;D

And I'm happy you are secure.  I feel pretty good about mine own self as well.

 ;D
« Last Edit: September 22, 2004, 10:32:54 AM by Tom Huckaby »

paul cowley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #110 on: September 22, 2004, 09:28:50 PM »
mr huckabee.....down here we shoot turkey in the spring but have been known to shoot them offseason....please don't let the calendar stand in your way as i would love to help host a shoot for you hereabouts anytime...... :-* ;) :)
« Last Edit: September 22, 2004, 09:29:33 PM by paul cowley »
paul cowley...golf course architect/asgca

TEPaul

Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #111 on: September 22, 2004, 10:00:31 PM »
TomH;

Golf in coastal Georgia is great but sometimes it takes some special preparation. Practice looking over you shoulder!  ;)

THuckaby2

Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #112 on: September 23, 2004, 09:41:39 AM »
Yikes!

OK guys, I've changed my feeble mind.  Davis Love III is not only truly the greatest golfer of our time, but he absolutely defines the words "manly", "cool" and "sportsman" in all possible connotations.  I admire him in all ways and live by his teachings.

This ought to tell you how bad I want to come to Cuscowilla and how much I am looking forward to the trip.

TH


TEPaul

Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #113 on: September 23, 2004, 10:42:09 AM »
That's more like it TomH! Don't you just be saying that, though, and not meaning it. Those rural boys down in Georgia are a whole lot better at smellin' a rat than you mght think they are. They don't trust those ultra modern liberal left coasters that much either. Did you ever see that movie with Burt Reynolds about that time those city slickers took that rafting trip down some rural wilderness river in Georgia and ran into some of those good ol boys out on the river by mistake?

THuckaby2

Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #114 on: September 23, 2004, 10:43:42 AM »
cue the sound of a banjo, playing the beginning of "dueling banjos"....

Oh yeah, I saw it.  Scared the crap out of me.

So I am afraid - very afraid.  All this talk has scared the dislike of Love clean out of me.

 ;D

paul cowley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #115 on: September 23, 2004, 01:21:06 PM »
tom huck......if you are already in cuscawilla ,it would be much closer and easier to let us host you and a group of GCA freinds at our new course on lake greenwood in nearby s.c....besides, although turkeys are everywhere this time of year ,you would be more apt to call up a 5' cottonmouth or hog than a decent gobbler.......but then again ,its alot like golf ,any excuse to get out there [and you might really like hanging out in the river swamp].

these are both serious offers ,let me know if you can.....p :)ul
paul cowley...golf course architect/asgca

Brian_Gracely

Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #116 on: September 23, 2004, 01:25:41 PM »
damn huck......you haven't lived until you went cottonmouth huntin'...just be careful not to shoot off your toes as you let them get close to you.

THuckaby2

Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #117 on: September 23, 2004, 01:29:28 PM »
Er uh Paul, when it comes to any form of hunting, the goober/dweeb/geek is all ME.  I am a city boy through and through and the only weapons I have ever fired have been in video game arcades.  :-[

So that's nice and all, and I do appreciate it... but for the health and safety of one and all, it's best for me to decline.

As for additional GOLF, well I am always up for that.  But unfortunately, the schedule is fully set (for me anyway) already.  I get there and play Athens CC (thank you Mr. Young!), then it's Cuscowilla all day Sat and Sun, the off to the airport.

Thanks anyway, though!

TH

ChipOat

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #118 on: September 24, 2004, 12:15:41 PM »
Haven't read pages 2-4 of this thread so apologies if this is a repeat.

Jerry Pate once sought relief from an unplayable lie in a mid- 70's U.S. Open by claiming that he intended to play the shot left-handed and, in so doing, would be standing on a cart path.

Relief was denied by Sandy Tatum and the following dialogue ensued:

Tatum:  "That would substantially alter the configuration of the shot."

Pate: "Mr. Tatum, I went to Alabama - not Harvard.  Do I get a free lift or don't I?".

TEPaul

Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #119 on: September 24, 2004, 01:50:29 PM »
"So I am afraid - very afraid.  All this talk has scared the dislike of Love clean out of me."

TomH:

Good deal! You're about half way home, my friend. But just remember, you better be totally sincere about what you just said. Guys like Davis and Mark Love and Paul Cowley can smell an insincere city slicker or West Coaster coming about two states away!


THuckaby2

Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #120 on: September 24, 2004, 01:53:50 PM »
TEP:

You can count on me.  I am nothing if not amiable, pliable and a good learner.

 ;D

TEPaul

Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #121 on: September 24, 2004, 02:00:54 PM »
"Second, gimme a break!  Not cheating is what you're SUPPOSED TO DO!  The fact is that the guy did what he's supposed to do.  I ain't givin' out anything more than a rubber cookie for that."

Dave:

I just don't think either you or a number of others really understand the significance of that situation with Love on #18 at Oakland Hills. It's not a matter of him just doing (or not doing) what he was supposed to do. You don't seem to realize that there wasn't a rules official out there (or probably anywhere else in the world) who would've thought twice about NOT GIVING LOVE RELIEF in that situation. Word has come back from all around that's pretty clear on that fact now! Don't you even remotely realize what that means?

This is simply not a matter of Love not cheating or not fudging the rules somehow. This was very different. I'm not certain why this is so unclear to most on here. I guess they just don't understand how rules application today (even amongst the world's best rules officials) works that well!

Brent Hutto

Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #122 on: September 24, 2004, 02:07:08 PM »
We've all heard whining from Tour players on the rare occasion that a rules official does not agree with their request for a drop. Think how much less stressful it must be when your standards are higher than those of the officials.

One would think that DL3 might not even ask for those borderline rulings that seem to give rise to hard feelings when they are turned down.

TEPaul

Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #123 on: September 24, 2004, 02:24:38 PM »
"Pate: "Mr. Tatum, I went to Alabama - not Harvard.  Do I get a free lift or don't I?"."

Chip:

You really should read pages 2-4 of this thread. That kind of thing amongst tour pros, and others, is very common and has been for years. Mostly they feel if they don't ask they'll never get and they completely depend on rules officials for that determination---instead of apparently completely understanding both the technicalities of a rule and also the honorable "spirit" of the game underlying it, as Davis Love seemed to so well. Some may depend as they do on rules officials to be safe but too many of them do it because they know and understand if the rules official makes a mistake (agrees with what they're asking for, even if outrageous, and/or makes a far too liberal interpretation and decision or simply makes a rules decision mistake) they (the player) can proceed under that official's ruling and decision with total impunity!

I really hate to say this because it may be just coincidence but an otherwise good guy, Ernie Els, seems prone to milking every possible nuance of the technicialiites of rules decision making amongst rules officials rather than simply applying the honorable spirit of the situation and going on without even talking to a rules official, as Love did.

Again, this could just be coinicidence but two very public situations amongst rules officials and Els (and perhaps some real mistakes on the part of those rules officials) may have gained Els a US Open championship as well as almost a Master championship.

The rules officials that officiate major tournaments are very good and it really is ironic that word is now out that every single one of them was more than ready to grant Love 24-2 relief on the 18th at Oakland Hills. Word is out now that the ones on the scene (which includes one of the best) was simply amazed when Love never asked. He apparently was standing there ready to have Love ask and demonstrate and he would've been granted 24-2 relief.

What some on here are saying that all Love did was just not cheat is apparently not the way it was at all. It's too bad they don't understand that because they're missing a very interesting and probably very important distinction between the way the rules are applied today and the true spirit of the game that lies beneath the honorable way to use the Rules of Golf.
« Last Edit: September 24, 2004, 02:29:16 PM by TEPaul »

George Pazin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Davis Love's decision on #18!
« Reply #124 on: September 24, 2004, 02:56:09 PM »
Why isn't there a provision within the Rules that one must drop in a similar situation - ie. if seeking relief from a sprinkler head while your ball is in the rough, you must drop in the rough? Seems logical to me. Kind of like if there's casual water in a section of a bunker, you still have to drop in the bunker (at least, I hope that's the rule!).
Big drivers and hot balls are the product of golf course design that rewards the hit one far then hit one high strategy.  Shinny showed everyone how to take care of this whole technology dilemma. - Pat Brockwell, 6/24/04