Buck:
Thanks for the plug on GBA.
I agree with you that Glen Echo is over-treed. Many of the trees between 15, 16 and 17 fairways were planted in the 1970's when Bill Hall was pro there, as he and I discussed that not long ago. The trees between 17 and 18 fairways were planted around 1930, after the new clubhouse was built. The grounds staff will be removing about 50 trees over the winter - mostly evergreens (or ever-brown as they've been fondly known) with a few others that will open up a few greens. However, I wouldn't look for much more at this time. I've asked them to remove many of the trees to the left of 14 that would open that up and give you a view of the lake from the tee, and have asked for the trees to the right of seven fairway be reduced.
As far the cross-bunkers, there were two primary ones - on the current 4th and 13th - all positioned about 50-75 yards short of the green. We have aerial photos of the one on 13 from the 1950's, but the one on 4 must have been replaced before that. There are currently 44 bunkers on the course, with four holes without bunkers - 2, 10, 11, and 15.
We all know much of the problems. Members that don't really understand the relationship between trees, grass, sun and wind. It's not rocket science and unfortunately, many of those in decision making at many area clubs don't have the foggiest as to what needs to be done.
St. Louis, for example, is supposed to get a permit from the city of Ladue each time it cuts down a tree that is 6" in diameter or larger. Algonquin has consistently had a grass problem, due to the narrow fairways and many trees, but there are those who would chain themselves to the trees rather than let the staff cut one down.
Glen Echo is considering some options, but much will be dictated by money at the present time.
Jim