Dean, you are up to 3 posts as a GCA newbie, and it seems you've struck the essence of many of the GCA.com's ongoing discussion. In some 8 years of umpteenine thousand posts, we are at a point that your post topic has just about been exhausted in viewpoints expressed, and yet nowhere near a consensus on what is a better way.
For my own part, I enjoy a narrative explanation of why a particular course you've played is superior, worth an effort to play, and what the merits are in specific descriptions. Or, why one shouldn't waste one's time because the course is a dog. But, tell us why from a design, strategy, construction or conditions stand point, not according to if you did well there. Saying it is a Doak 7 is in my opinion not all that helpful.
Happy posting, and welcome.