Dan K:
The corollary would be that in many places, to exist at that green fee, the owner would have to be a philanthropist who doesn't care if he ever makes his money back off building the course. That's great, when they come around.
The Rawls Course is well under $100, but it certainly wouldn't be if not for the generosity of Mr. Rawls. In fact, it probably wouldn't look anything like it does, if we'd had to build something on a model of breaking even for $45 green fees.
Brad:
I already covered Old Works -- it's not "great" by my definition and it cost a fortune to build, but all of us taxpayers have already subsidized that one. I have never been to North Dakota so I can't comment there, but it's North Dakota, so even an affordable course is only affordable 4 months out of the year ... you need three of them to count as one.
Garland:
I'd be glad to build a "Tom Doak trail" in Nebraska, but I've been assured by those in the know that if we did build it, it would lose money. The RTJ trail in Alabama is only profitable once you write off the capital costs to an outside source as "business development," something that not too many states would consider in this economic climate.