Wading in, rather in the manner of some big fat baldy avocet, I feel the need to give a 'balanced' viewpoint here. I am the ultimate multi-tasker here. I am a golfer. There, I have admitted it. I am also, an environmentalist - some may say mere mentalist...
I live, breathe, work and play on the bonnie coast of eastern scotland. RESPONSIBLE development is VERY allowed. What is viewed dimly is development which kills things, immutably changes things, causes harm to an existing environment, makes an irreversible alteration to NATURE.
Pretty noble causes. Various governmental agencies will, lawfully, chew your bollocks off should you attempt to circumvent said practices.
Luckily, there are plenty of opportunities for appeal, to present learned comment, to mitigate. That is the way of British law.
A balanced view will normally out.
The Trump PROPOSALS will be given every opportunity. Opposing voices WILL be heard. BALANCE will be the result.
Zum beispiel, I'd guess T could develop here more easily than he could in California. Speaks volumes to me...
My vision...? He'll gain permission, create a protected wildlife wilderness, be lauded by all the agencies, gain a Knighthood or at least an MBE and die a happy laddie, buried by the first tee of his beloved golf course....
FBD.