Both were great but would love to play them dry, it rained pretty much at least half the time both days. Conditions were still good at both courses, reasonably firm.
Fowler did really good routings there, I liked Beau Desert's "slicer's dream" routing where none of the out of bounds was on the right side, the 12 perimeter holes were all clock wise around the property! The Delamere routing was the opposite for the front nine and the same for the back. BD has an out and back routing, DF two loops of nine.
There may not be a prettier site in golf than that from the clubhouse at Delamere, with #10 tee, #18 green, #9 green and #1 tee all lined up left to right in front of you with the forest in the center.
I would say the consensus of our group was that Beau Desert is a superior golf course because it has much more contoured and interesting greens. Is there a record of the greens being reworked at Delamere Forest? Certainly those greens are much flatter and less interesting in general, although some like #16 have good slopes. Typically there the slopes were regular planes rather than multiplane contours such as those at Beau Desert.
Delamere Forest with Beau Desert's greens would be quite an outstanding golf course instead of a very good one, while Beau Desert is certainly of the highest heathland/parkland level. It is a shame about all the trees at Beau Desert, as some of the driving lines are pinched. Otherwise, nothing could be improved.
Having said that, the clubhouse at Delamere Forest is much more attractive and traditional, but the new dormy house at Beau Desert is a great feature. The rate of 75 pounds a night to include B&B and a round of golf is hard to beat.
The hospitality at both courses was very nice and much appreciated.
Thanks for your recommendation of the two courses, Mark, they were an excellent complement to the links courses at Hoylake and Wallasey.