News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Up Day
« on: July 04, 2006, 10:09:28 AM »
On the "Is Shorter, Better" thread, I proposed the possibility of setting aside a day where every course in America would move the tee markers up and encourage people to play from there and see if they might enjoy it more.

Of course, just making every hole shorter is not necessarily going to make them better.  So, I want to ask each of you to work on a little homework assignment.

Get the scorecard for your home course, and "design" the most interesting set-up you can which stays under 6,300 yards.  Suggestions:  

a.  Keep a couple of the par-4's pretty long, even playing them from the blue tees instead of the whites, if there is no big forced carry off the tee;
b.  Make some of the par-5's really short [even par-4 length, you're welcome to reduce the par to 70 if you want];
c.  Use the red tees so one of the par-4's is driveable;
d.  Try to use up tees on holes where they will bring new hazards into play off the tee; and
e.  Try to make the course as short a walk as possible.

Save your work in case this thing gets off the ground and we are successful in promoting Up Day 2007.  Or, even get your club to try it in 2006.

[Note:  my club, Crystal Downs, is only 6200 yards from the white tees on an everyday basis.]


Tom Roewer

Re:Up Day
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2006, 10:29:43 AM »
Tom:  Todays date reminds me.   My members used to love our "Friday Games" when we would play "Red, White, and Blue".  A rotation of tees.  Of course depending on the course , it can be very enjoyable.  It allows play on normally Par 5's with a great second into a smaller than normal green, great short par fours and par 3's of much more varying lengths than usual.

Geoffrey Childs

Re:Up Day
« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2006, 10:46:37 AM »
Tom

That sounds like you are describing the typical Dev Emmet course I mentioned in the "shorter is better" thread.

Always had one or two 450 yard 4 pars.

Always had one or two 225+ yard 3 pars.

Always had short 300 yards and 120 or so yard par 4's and 3's that could incorporate "tricks" or severe features.

Half par holes are a key.

The courses were in the 6200-6400 yard range.

Its a good idea in my opinion.  
« Last Edit: July 04, 2006, 10:47:29 AM by Geoffrey Childs »

ForkaB

Re:Up Day
« Reply #3 on: July 04, 2006, 10:46:55 AM »
Tom

This is a great idea, except in Scotland which (as you know)  almost every day is an "Up Day!"  :)

As a corollary, how about an "Up Your Designers Day" where every GCA has to commit to designing courses which can be played "up" without disruption.  Think the Old Course, which is built for seamless transitions between tees and greens at its natural 6500 yard length but can also accomodate the big boys every 5 years or so by sending them back to tees deep into the bushes--even onto other courses!

Rich

Jim_Kennedy

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Up Day
« Reply #4 on: July 04, 2006, 11:12:04 AM »
Tom,
We play under 3100 everyday. The yardages are
420, 175, 401, 370, 138, 358, 460(5), 188, and 533.  Some recent work on #6 caused us to use it's forward tee, at 254 yards, for all play. Many of the guys were lamenting (including the longer hitters) the move back to it's original location because they were enjoying driving the green, or being very close, and having more chances at birdies.

"I never beat a well man in my life" - Harry Vardon

Lou_Duran

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Up Day
« Reply #5 on: July 04, 2006, 11:18:50 AM »
TD,

Many courses I play, specially the popular daily-fee types, already do something like this quite often.  Seldom do I play a course to the scorecard yardage of the back tees.  I think the shorter setups are done to speed up play and save on maintenance, not to promote fun as you advocate.

You seem to equate fun with shooting a lower score.  As Michael Whitaker noted in your other thread, there appears to be a cultural difference between golfers in the States ('what did you shoot') and the UK ('did you have fun').  If one looks to the game for challenge, as a chance to test oneself against the scorecard and time (historically- what I did last week, last year, a decade ago), and as an opportunity to persevere, scoring higher in a more rigorous examination may very well be superior to a low score on one that has been dumbed down.

BTW, while I've been prohibited from playing the tips on a number of occasions, not once have I been prevented from playing a course from the shortest distances possible.  At my prior club, we too used to have a "Red, White, and Blue" tournament and it died years ago for a lack of interest.  Perhaps one of the game's allure, at least on this side of the Atlantic, is its inherent difficulty.  Maybe unlike for your design associate, a 76 from the tips is more intrinsically rewarding than a 73 from the shorties.  Who is to say that one value system is superior to other?  

BTW2, when we play your courses, particularly Pacific Dunes and Stone Eagle, are we not in effect already doing what you suggest?  Perhaps this approach to golf- shorter courses with more demanding green complexes- will drift our culture in the direction you seek.  If not, I am sure your clients will let you know.

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Re:Up Day
« Reply #6 on: July 04, 2006, 12:30:03 PM »
Lou:

On the contrary, most of my golf for the past 20 years has been played predominantly on the top 10% of courses in America, most of which are designed to be challenging and therefore rewarding to low-handicaps as you say.  And I've often been dragged too far back, because I often play golf with green chairmen and golf professionals who play a lot more than I do.  

I have found moving up to be fun, primarily as a change of pace and a contrast.  And it's nice to have a chance to shoot the same sorts of scores that I could shoot twenty years ago from the back tees, when I had more chance to play and to practice.

My assignment here was specifically to get others to try and find shorter ways around their courses and to see which holes might be more interesting to them from somewhere other than the back tee.  I think I've always looked for that in my own designs, right back to High Pointe, where there are several holes which can be played from an alternate tee.

Moving up will not be popular if the holes become boring as a result.  But length is not always the answer.  Sometimes a hole is more interesting from a shorter tee.
« Last Edit: July 04, 2006, 12:31:52 PM by Tom_Doak »

Sean Leary

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Up Day
« Reply #7 on: July 04, 2006, 12:37:09 PM »
Tom,

Don't the Doak tees at Tumble Creek represent what you are proposing here, and was that the intent of those tees?

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Re:Up Day
« Reply #8 on: July 04, 2006, 02:50:08 PM »
Sean:

Yes, that was the idea, although since Tumble Creek is a relatively stretched-out development course by our standards [i.e. few short-cuts from green to tee], that set of tees only mixes up the course more liberally in terms of the yardages of individual holes.

TEPaul

Re:Up Day
« Reply #9 on: July 04, 2006, 03:13:42 PM »
TomD:

At my course we are now doing a number of things that we've never done before and it's working so well to show our membership and various levels of them our course's true variety, elasticity and potential.

Sometimes they play it "up" and sometimes they put on what they now call "tough day".

It's amazing how much more our membership now understands not just the variety and adaptability of our course but also how much more they understand the adapabilitty and potential of architecture and particularly varied maintenance practices.

Some are even saying things like; "Where has this golf course been all these years"?

It's so encouraging.

Craig Sweet

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Up Day
« Reply #10 on: July 04, 2006, 03:22:35 PM »
We have rebuilt several "forward" tee's, and added to the front of several regular tee's....the idea is to bring our "white" markers up...thus shortening the course...I was lobbying for a "combo" set of tee's....maybe play off the forward "gold" tee's on some holes and the white tee's on others...my thinking was it would save us a lot of money in tee construction costs, and maintainance, as we would be using existing tee's rather than adding more ground to mow and more tee markers to move everyday....we have a local course that is doing a combo of tee's,...they combine the blue and blacks to make a 6700 yard combo...it has its own rating and slope....and plays somewhere between the blue and black tee yardage...

Glenn Spencer

Re:Up Day
« Reply #11 on: July 04, 2006, 03:28:07 PM »
Do what you all want to do, I don't care.  If you play every tee up, then you are shooting a low score, but it is on a par 67 or something course. Everyone seems to like a good gambler par 4 of under 320 or so and I am no different, but I like to feel that I deserve to play them by dealing with some tougher holes along the way. If all the par 4's were 310, I would not enjoy myself, but one or two a round make for the best holes in the world sometimes, playing 8 of them would just be repetitive and easy.

Craig Sweet

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Up Day
« Reply #12 on: July 04, 2006, 03:32:57 PM »
Glen....I have found...not necessarily at my architecturally challenged muni....that the startegy needed to play the hole, regardless of length, changes from tee to tee...especially when the tee boxes are left, right etc. from where I normally tee from...

Jeff_Brauer

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Up Day
« Reply #13 on: July 04, 2006, 03:44:25 PM »
Tom,

Neat idea. Why don't you write it up for USGA or NGF to promote?
Jeff Brauer, ASGCA Director of Outreach

scott_wood

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Up Day
« Reply #14 on: July 04, 2006, 04:06:20 PM »
and if NOT Tom, then SOMEBODY......we speculate on ways that GCA can have a positive influence on the game....
and this might be "IT"....

Jordan Wall

Re:Up Day
« Reply #15 on: July 04, 2006, 07:05:06 PM »
On the "Is Shorter, Better" thread, I proposed the possibility of setting aside a day where every course in America would move the tee markers up and encourage people to play from there and see if they might enjoy it more.

Of course, just making every hole shorter is not necessarily going to make them better.  So, I want to ask each of you to work on a little homework assignment.

Get the scorecard for your home course, and "design" the most interesting set-up you can which stays under 6,300 yards.  Suggestions:  

a.  Keep a couple of the par-4's pretty long, even playing them from the blue tees instead of the whites, if there is no big forced carry off the tee;
b.  Make some of the par-5's really short [even par-4 length, you're welcome to reduce the par to 70 if you want];
c.  Use the red tees so one of the par-4's is driveable;
d.  Try to use up tees on holes where they will bring new hazards into play off the tee; and
e.  Try to make the course as short a walk as possible.

Save your work in case this thing gets off the ground and we are successful in promoting Up Day 2007.  Or, even get your club to try it in 2006.

[Note:  my club, Crystal Downs, is only 6200 yards from the white tees on an everyday basis.]



I loved the Doak tees at Tumble Creek.
The variety was great!!!

Bill_McBride

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Up Day
« Reply #16 on: July 04, 2006, 07:18:04 PM »
Cuscowilla has a good set of combination tees.  The long par 4s at #9 and #18 are played as par 5s.  The tees on two par 4s with forced carries over water - #4 and #10 - are set on the forward tees there, across the pond.  The result is, I think, par 73 and pretty sporty.

Travis Ripley

Re:Up Day
« Reply #17 on: July 04, 2006, 08:12:01 PM »
when i was a junior/high school player, former Oklahoma University coach David Yates (former multi-sport star at Delaware U.) used to encourage us to play the so-called women's tees at my home club as a kind of playing pedagogy to do a lot what many have posted to get used to hitting different kinds of shots and thinking course management in different ways.....and also to build expectations about making birdies.  


Jason Topp

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Up Day
« Reply #18 on: July 05, 2006, 09:51:16 AM »
At my relatively short course (6550 - par 70), I only play the white tees in club events (6200 or so).  My impression is the par threes are better because they have more varied yardages and the par fives are better because they become reachable with two good shots.  I think it makes very little difference on most of the par fours.

I find it interesting that the scorecard has a mixed set of tees, where one alternates between the blues and whites, but does so in exactly the opposite manner.  Most of the longer par fours are shortened and the 3's and 5's are played from the back tees.  I've noticed other courses do this as well.


Tom Huckaby

Re:Up Day
« Reply #19 on: July 05, 2006, 10:15:22 AM »
After hours of exhausting effort, my submission is as follows:

Pasatiempo GC, white tees.

 ;D

Mike Hendren

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Up Day
« Reply #20 on: July 05, 2006, 10:36:30 AM »
Apparently the PGA tour is trolling around for a last minute replacement course for the B.C. Open due to flooding.  Among the courses they visited was Binghamton CC, a Tillinghast design that tips out at 6,480 yards.

How about Up Day On The PGA Tour?

It would be a blast.

Mike
Two Corinthians walk into a bar ....

Matt MacIver

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Up Day
« Reply #21 on: July 05, 2006, 10:50:10 AM »
I undertook this task early this spring, really to create more risk-reward tee shots but also to simplify the walk around my neighborhood- traversing course.  

I settled somewhere in the 6300-6400 yard range and used four different tees (Gold, Blue, White, Red), making a few long par 4's, a short 110 yard par 3 (walkability factor) and two drivable par 4's.  I wanted to keep the slope and rating somewhere between the Blues & Whites, which I typically play, so when I play I know how to handicap it.  

Willie_Dow

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Up Day
« Reply #22 on: July 05, 2006, 10:50:30 AM »
This great idea should put emphasis on line e - to make the course the shortest walk possible.

Glenn Spencer

Re:Up Day
« Reply #23 on: July 05, 2006, 11:53:02 AM »
Ok, I have been on this site for a while now. So far I have seen these basic quotes.

1. I like to see the professionals struggle to make par.
2. Birdie-fests are no fun to watch on TV.
3. The technology has made the game easier and easier to hit it straight.
4. It is a cart-ball course
5. You must walk the course to get a proper feel for its architecture

Now I am reading that people want to move the tees up so that they can shoot the scores they used to shoot. They want the rounds to move as fast as possible and they want the tees right on top of the greens.

In my opinion, you are not going to shoot 75 all your life, so if you can't do it, you can do it. If you want to move up to the front tees and have fun that is fine, just don't be disappointed if the rest of the country doesn't want to. Some people like to hit a 4-iron from the fairway every once in a while. Some people don't consider this boring or a slog. Some people, (Hogan included) thought that long irons were the definition of a player. I guess I should also say hybrids as well now.

What is the hurry to get done with the round that you want to move up tees? Are you running home to your wife, so you can do some gardening or fix something? If it frustrates you that much to be on the course for 4 hours, maybe it is not the right sport for you. Play at 6PM when nobody is out there. I am sure that you are all busy men and I understand that, but the sport I love doesn't need to be compromised because we don't have a lot of time. You either need to make the time or give it up. Don't put your problems on us.

Also, nobody is holding a gun to your head to walk. The course is the course, if you are going to complain about the walks then take a cart. If the regulation course is too long, then don't walk it. Some people don't want to be playing a 6300 yard golf course next summer on Aug.10 or whatever at their club. Some people play golf because it is a challenge unlike any other sport and it is not fair or easy and that is why they enjoy it.

Mike Hendren

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Up Day
« Reply #24 on: July 05, 2006, 12:03:04 PM »
Glenn,

Thanks for not using "you people."

Mike
Two Corinthians walk into a bar ....