News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Peter Pratt

  • Total Karma: 0
Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« on: June 30, 2006, 11:26:30 AM »
Would it be worthwhile for Ran to profile a well-known golf course that fails the test of architectural brilliance? Would it be helpful--a learning experience for us novices--to have him assess how a golf course on a good piece of land didn't work and why it didn't work?

If so, which course would you nominate? Please bear in mind that I want him to choose a course whose shortcomings would be instructive. I don't want a bitch session.

In Michigan, a good choice might be Bay Harbor, a course I like a good deal but perhaps could've been better.

HamiltonBHearst

Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2006, 11:31:43 AM »


Sandpines. It does not look like he has profiled any Rees courses.

Eric Franzen

  • Total Karma: 0
Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2006, 11:56:07 AM »
...to have him assess how a golf course on a good piece of land didn't work and why it didn't work?

How about Doonbeg or Old Head?

John Kavanaugh

Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2006, 11:59:46 AM »
I love that Ran writes nice things about golf courses...we got enough "critics" on this site.

Ted Kramer

  • Total Karma: 0
Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2006, 12:07:55 PM »
I vote for for Lido.
I'd love to hear his opinion regarding 13-18.
I consider that closing stretch to be about as much fun as any that I've played anywhere.

Lido is a true prize muni. . .
I miss it more and more all the time.

-Ted

Dan Herrmann

  • Total Karma: 0
Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #5 on: June 30, 2006, 12:49:15 PM »
Phoenixville (PA), a Hugh Wilson 9-holer.

I'd love to see a compare/contrast between Phoenixville and Merion East.  Both have the same architect, but, obviously, the courses have quite a different pedigree.


ForkaB

Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #6 on: June 30, 2006, 12:58:34 PM »
I'd rather that Ran mop up all the great courses that he hasn't profiled yet.

There are already a lot of relative clunkers in his list, but as John says, he's too nice a guy to say anything instructively negative.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2006, 12:59:21 PM by Rich Goodale »

John Kavanaugh

Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #7 on: June 30, 2006, 01:03:49 PM »
I will gladly send a copy of Robert Bain's Clans & Tartans of Scotland to the person who can come up with the most negative thing Ran has ever said about a course profiled on this site.(In the actual review of course)

Tom Huckaby

Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #8 on: June 30, 2006, 01:09:06 PM »
I want that book,and this is a fun challenge.  So far, all I've found is this, from the Yale profile:


Yale remains to this day a colossus of a design, even if it is not maintained and presented in the manner in which it deserves.


Leader in the clubhouse?

George Pazin

  • Total Karma: 0
Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #9 on: June 30, 2006, 01:16:45 PM »
I'd rather that Ran mop up all the great courses that he hasn't profiled yet.

There are already a lot of relative clunkers in his list, but as John says, he's too nice a guy to say anything instructively negative.

I'm always happy to find agreement with Rich, at least in the first part - I haven't played enough of the others to say if there are any relative clunkers.

My own personal preference for a course to be profiled would be The Rawls Course, as it's one of the few somewhat known courses I've played, and I'd like to see how his thoughts compared to mine.
Big drivers and hot balls are the product of golf course design that rewards the hit one far then hit one high strategy.  Shinny showed everyone how to take care of this whole technology dilemma. - Pat Brockwell, 6/24/04

Eric Franzen

  • Total Karma: 0
Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #10 on: June 30, 2006, 01:18:35 PM »
I want that book,and this is a fun challenge.  So far, all I've found is this, from the Yale profile:


Yale remains to this day a colossus of a design, even if it is not maintained and presented in the manner in which it deserves.


Leader in the clubhouse?

I'll make it easy and just link the whole profile on Augusta National. http://www.golfclubatlas.com/augusta000150.html

Game, set and match!

John Kavanaugh

Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #11 on: June 30, 2006, 01:19:10 PM »
I want that book,and this is a fun challenge.  So far, all I've found is this, from the Yale profile:


Yale remains to this day a colossus of a design, even if it is not maintained and presented in the manner in which it deserves.


Leader in the clubhouse?

Huck,

Even as jaded as I am...I find that to be a compliment of the architecture.

Tom Huckaby

Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #12 on: June 30, 2006, 01:21:23 PM »
Eric - correct - you win - I skimmed over that, didn't read close enough.  Can I borrow the book some time?

JK - hey, all you asked for is the "most negative."  You didn't say it had to actually BE negative.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2006, 01:23:20 PM by Tom Huckaby »

Eric Franzen

  • Total Karma: 0
Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #13 on: June 30, 2006, 01:25:51 PM »
"MacKenzie would have little time for today's sharp-edged, blah shaped bunkers as there is little attempt to integrate them into their natural surrounds"

Huck,

Sorry, I didn't know that "blah shaped bunkers" actually is used as a compliment in northern cali.  ;D

 

John Kavanaugh

Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #14 on: June 30, 2006, 01:26:51 PM »
Huck,

I am sorry but that ANGC review has me troubled...that Ran said "but fans of Alister MacKenzie would be better served to look elsewhere for a game."  has me questioning the validity of this site....and it only took me until lunch today.


    

Glenn Spencer

Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #15 on: June 30, 2006, 01:27:52 PM »
Would it be worthwhile for Ran to profile a well-known golf course that fails the test of architectural brilliance? Would it be helpful--a learning experience for us novices--to have him assess how a golf course on a good piece of land didn't work and why it didn't work?

If so, which course would you nominate? Please bear in mind that I want him to choose a course whose shortcomings would be instructive. I don't want a bitch session.

In Michigan, a good choice might be Bay Harbor, a course I like a good deal but perhaps could've been better.


Yes, I would think that the Bay Harbor profile would be quite interesting.

Tom Huckaby

Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #16 on: June 30, 2006, 01:29:44 PM »
JK - so what took you so long?

Eric - I revised my post. ;D

ForkaB

Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #17 on: June 30, 2006, 01:32:37 PM »
There is a course in St. Andrews, Scotland that Ran calls "old."  What a slap in the face!

Glenn Spencer

Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #18 on: June 30, 2006, 01:33:35 PM »
However, what has been lost with time at Broadmoor are Ross's corridors of play, which have been severely compromised underneath hundreds upon hundreds of hardwood trees. The player on numerous occasions can be in a bunker off the tee and have no shot but to chip out as directly between him and the flag are one or more trees.


Robert_Ball

  • Total Karma: 0
Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #19 on: June 30, 2006, 03:05:46 PM »
I will gladly send a copy of Robert Bain's Clans & Tartans of Scotland to the person who can come up with the most negative thing Ran has ever said about a course profiled on this site.(In the actual review of course)

John,

Take your pick from Ran's Bandon Dunes review...

"Will the first course at Bandon Dunes stand up to the scrutiny in the way that Pebble Beach and Cypress Point have for decades? No."

"Bandon's design weakness lies in the way the bunkers and surrounds often aren't fully and compellingly integrated together."

"...the authors must question the clumsy routing."

"Regardless, Kidd continues to refine Bandon Dunes (ironically, perhaps a sign that it wasn't as good as everyone initially thought)."


-Robert
« Last Edit: June 30, 2006, 03:06:39 PM by Robert_Ball »

John Kavanaugh

Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #20 on: June 30, 2006, 03:07:50 PM »
I will gladly send a copy of Robert Bain's Clans & Tartans of Scotland to the person who can come up with the most negative thing Ran has ever said about a course profiled on this site.(In the actual review of course)

John,

Take your pick from Ran's Bandon Dunes review...

"Will the first course at Bandon Dunes stand up to the scrutiny in the way that Pebble Beach and Cypress Point have for decades? No."

"Bandon's design weakness lies in the way the bunkers and surrounds often aren't fully and compellingly integrated together."

"...the authors must question the clumsy routing."

"Regardless, Kidd continues to refine Bandon Dunes (ironically, perhaps a sign that it wasn't as good as everyone initially thought)."


-Robert

We have a new leader...Ran towing the party line..gotta love it.

Tom Huckaby

Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #21 on: June 30, 2006, 03:19:34 PM »
JK - hmmmmm... of course you are sole judge and jury here, but methinks Mr. Ball cheated a bit taking these out of context... the overall review re Bandon Dunes is pretty favorable... or at least it's not close to as negative as what Ran says about Augusta.

Sorry Robert.   ;D

BTW, Ran surely wasn't toeing any lines, not back in 2002..... methinks he created the line that since has been toed.

 ;D


Jay Flemma

Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #22 on: June 30, 2006, 03:25:02 PM »
Hiawatha Landing in Apalachin, NY

Great unsung course.  After that, Royal New Kent.  They are both excellent courses with alot to teach us, yet nobody has written about them in depth.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2006, 03:28:14 PM by Jay Flemma »

John Kavanaugh

Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #23 on: June 30, 2006, 03:25:50 PM »
Huck,

I think it is tow considering he pulls most of us alone with him.  Come on...You can surely find one more so I can send you this book.  It is in excellent condition but sadly is a 1968 reprint.

Tom Huckaby

Re:Which less than great course should Ran profile?
« Reply #24 on: June 30, 2006, 03:28:15 PM »
Huck,

I think it is tow considering he pulls most of us alone with him.  Come on...You can surely find one more so I can send you this book.  It is in excellent condition but sadly is a 1968 reprint.

Good point.  Tow it is.

And man I am searching but this ain't easy!  I can't imagine any surpassing the bastion of negativity found in the Augusta review, which has me so down I'm looking for a dog to kick.   ;)