News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Jordan Wall

The Big Four of NY
« on: May 15, 2006, 03:19:42 PM »
NGLA, SH, Maidstone, and FH.

How do these courses compare to each other and what are some of the major differences between them??

They are all very beautiful.

cary lichtenstein

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2006, 03:29:40 PM »
This could be the subject of your thesis ;D
Live Jupiter, Fl, was  4 handicap, played top 100 US, top 75 World. Great memories, no longer play, 4 back surgeries. I don't miss a lot of things about golf, life is simpler with out it. I miss my 60 degree wedge shots, don't miss nasty weather, icing, back spasms. Last course I played was Augusta

Jason Mandel

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #2 on: May 15, 2006, 03:33:58 PM »
They are all really hard clubs to join ;)

You learn more about a man on a golf course than anywhere else

contact info: jasonymandel@gmail.com

Tiger_Bernhardt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #3 on: May 15, 2006, 03:38:42 PM »
I think it is alot more than the big 4.

E. Jean-Marc Monrad

Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #4 on: May 15, 2006, 03:52:05 PM »
Are those really the big Four.  I thought the big four might include Winged foot, and Bethpage Black before Maidstone.  Also Sebonick when it shows up?


Shinnecock
National

Winged foot
Friars
Bethpage
Maidstone


Quaker ridge.

This is how I would rate them.  You?

Jordan Wall

Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #5 on: May 15, 2006, 05:34:32 PM »
Include what you please in that list.

How do they compare to each other and what are some similarities.

For instance, is the better redan hole #4 at NGLA or #7 at SH??

ed_getka

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #6 on: May 15, 2006, 06:49:37 PM »
Jordan,
    These are some of the finest courses in the country. It will take a whole lot more than a post here to start breaking down all the factors that go into making those courses great.
    I would read Ran's course profiles first and then ask specific questions.
    The Redan question is specific, but I can't answer it since I haven't played both.
"Perimeter-weighted fairways", The best euphemism for containment mounding I've ever heard.

jeffwarne

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #7 on: May 15, 2006, 07:37:54 PM »
Jordan,
You meant Big 40 didn't you?
The four you mentioned are less than 20 miles apart as the crow flies -
There are a LOT more great ones in the state
"Let's slow the damned greens down a bit, not take the character out of them." Tom Doak
"Take their focus off the grass and put it squarely on interesting golf." Don Mahaffey

Doug Braunsdorf

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #8 on: May 15, 2006, 08:05:35 PM »
I honestly am not sure that those are the "Big Four" consensus for NY.  Who cares, it's all individual, whatever you like.

My order of personal preference?

NGLA
SH
FI
Maidstone/Garden City, Fenway (I enjoy asmuch as QR)/Winged Foot W & E and for some stupid reason I am really, really partial to Piping Rock (which also has a good redan, better than SH)  I personally prefer old courses, can you tell? ;D

Is that because you're old?  ;)
"Never approach a bull from the front, a horse from the rear, or a fool from any direction."

Jordan Wall

Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #9 on: May 15, 2006, 08:08:24 PM »
Jordan,
You meant Big 40 didn't you?
The four you mentioned are less than 20 miles apart as the crow flies -
There are a LOT more great ones in the state

Thats what I was trying to get at.

The one's on Long Island, close to each other.

Currently I am trying to study NGLA, as it is beautiful, and all the four courses I mentioned (NGLA more so than the other other three).

Anyways, because I was studyingf these courses, I wondered if any of you had a preference to any one of those courses and why??

I mean, why are they so special, and so dang good looking?

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #10 on: May 15, 2006, 08:33:49 PM »
Jordan:

All four are very different examples of fine golf architecture, but each one is special because of its setting, to begin with.

National is a roller-coaster up and over ridges and down again, with more golf holes running away in the distance, and when you get to the 17th tee the view is unreal.  It's the perfect site for Macdonald's style and has THE best versions of many of his favorite holes.

Shinnecock is a different kind of roller-coaster ... the routing is a series of triangles so you're facing the wind at different directions.  But you can see much of it from that spectacular clubhouse setting on the hill, and the grasses between the holes are a thing of beauty.

Maidstone starts and ends at the beach club although it's never in play ... you go out and back through a very flat stretch of marshy ground and lagoons, but at the far end you get to play some of the only true links golf in America, including two absolutely world-class golf holes, the par-4 ninth and par-3 14th with the Atlantic Ocean for a backdrop.

Friars Head is a scruffy, dunesy site with some spectacular bunkering ... it feels more like Pine Valley to me than most of the imitations, although they did not go to the extreme of making every hole an island in the sand.

The reason The Bridge and Atlantic are not quite in this class is because they don't have the same sort of character; you couldn't describe either of them in four lines like that.  Hopefully Sebonack will hold its head up in the neighborhood.

Jordan Wall

Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #11 on: May 15, 2006, 08:47:18 PM »
I guess Fishers is in the same vicinity as the four I mentioned.

I have had a particular fascination for NGLA.  From what I can tell, some of the blind shots are fantastic, and the green sites are really amazing.  17 has a beautiful view, at least in pictures.  The coolest looking hole IMO is #3 because it is was uphill and blind, and it looks to be such a fun approach shot.  The bottle hole looks so awesome, someday I will challenge those sweet fairway bunkers!!  #10 offers, fro what I see, a different challenge than some of the other holes.  I love the green complex, and how there is room for a running draw but the green is so big you could easily four putt.  It looks so cool.

Maidstone also looks beautiful.  #9 is amazing, a PV hole look-alike, say with dunes on the sides of the hole instead of pits.

Very cool looking courses.

Wayne Freeman

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #12 on: May 15, 2006, 11:42:10 PM »
Tom-  that was certainly a very thoughtful and patient explanation-  almost parental in nature.  Well stated. I have played all those courses and appreciate your insight. It helps me appreciate them even more.
   Jordan,  one of the problems with this type of question is that many of us are just so passionate about golf and the reverence of these courses, that the question almost borders on the ridiculous (with all due respect).  That's probably why so many of the comments are rather curt.  You could spend days debating a big 4.  And it's probably not important anyway since there are so many great ones in New York.
    When I read your post I was thinking the following; answering your question is like asking someone in your dad's generation who was more beautiful and why:   Sophia Loren, Marilyn Monroe, Raquel Welch, or Liz Taylor-  it can't really be done.  

Jordan Wall

Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #13 on: May 15, 2006, 11:46:52 PM »
Wayne.

I understand.
 :)
It's just after reading lots and lots about these courses it intrigues me to see some of the comments GCA folk has about them.  What makes them good for instance, or perhaps why you can always play one of these courses and always have something completely different happen every time.  In my mind which seems to run forever, it really comes down to fascination of these courses, if you know what I mean.  
« Last Edit: May 16, 2006, 10:22:52 AM by Jordan Wall »

Patrick_Mucci

Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #14 on: May 15, 2006, 11:51:56 PM »
Jordan Wall,

Have you purchased or read "Scotland's Gift" or "The Evangelist of Golf" ?

If not, go no further in your studies without reading them.

Wayne Freeman

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #15 on: May 16, 2006, 01:09:25 AM »
Another thing about these courses-  you can spend a lifetime just trying to get on any of them-  and you may never be successful.  I wish I could comment on the changability of them, but in fact I feel incredibly fortunate that I have been able to play them all ONCE!

Mike_Sweeney

Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #16 on: May 16, 2006, 09:53:47 AM »
Jordan,

Here is my Big Ten on Long Island:

1. National
2. Shinnecock
3. Garden City
4. Piping Rock - many will disagree with this one
5. Maidstone
6. Friars Head
7. Bethpage Black - with Winged Footish greens it would vault to #3
8. The Creek
9. Atlantic
10. The Bridge

* never played East Hampton, Westhampton or Sebonack. Montauk has the potential to take #10.

Sleepers:

St George's
Seawane
Inwood
Southampton

Jordan Wall

Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #17 on: May 16, 2006, 10:30:00 AM »
Mike.

I hear so much of that about Bethpage, at least about the greens.  I know Tillie wanted to make it an extreme test, and judging by a lot of forced carries and elevated green's, it looks like it is.  But why would the greens be so flat??  To me it just does not make sense.  Greens alone can make a course worth seeing, and Bethpage is so good already (from what I have heard) then wouldn't really nice green's with big, bold contours make the course a whole lot better?

Gene Greco

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #18 on: May 16, 2006, 11:13:01 AM »
Maidstone also looks beautiful.  #9 is amazing, a PV hole look-alike, say with dunes on the sides of the hole instead of pits.

Aside from the fact that #9 Maidstone might be better than any hole at PV, it also happens to be situated hard by the sea in the dunes with lovely bare maidens taking the sun during the summer months.

Indeed, for a 16 year old male, #9 at The Maidstone could be considered the greatest hole in the world. :)
"...I don't believe it is impossible to build a modern course as good as Pine Valley.  To me, Sand Hills is just as good as Pine Valley..."    TOM DOAK  November 6th, 2010

JSlonis

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #19 on: May 16, 2006, 12:18:18 PM »
redanman,

There is no stupid reason for loving Piping Rock.  I had heard good things about the golf course, but until a few years ago, when I got the chance to play it in the Met Am, I hadn't realized how short sighted the reviews of just "good" were.  I absolutely fell in love with the course.  I thought it was an outstanding test of golf, made even better by the playing conditions that Rick Spear has cultivated.  The variety of holes and the different architectural features that abound, make for a most enjoyable round.  All this praise, and I haven't even mentioned the green designs yet. ;D  

The short but tough "Knoll" hole.  A back tier hole location on this green is certainly an adventure.
« Last Edit: May 16, 2006, 09:24:58 PM by JSlonis »

Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +3/-1
Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #20 on: May 16, 2006, 12:59:10 PM »
It amazes me to see Piping Rock that high on some people's lists.  It was pretty run down when we did the work on it for Mr. Dye twenty years ago, and the course had really fallen out of favor on Long Island.

Steve Lapper

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #21 on: May 16, 2006, 01:03:53 PM »
Maidstone also looks beautiful.  #9 is amazing, a PV hole look-alike, say with dunes on the sides of the hole instead of pits.

Aside from the fact that #9 Maidstone might be better than any hole at PV, it also happens to be situated hard by the sea in the dunes with lovely bare maidens taking the sun during the summer months.

Indeed, for a 16 year old male, #9 at The Maidstone could be considered the greatest hole in the world. :)


Only if he desires early Social X-Ray's and is willing to cede himself to cute pink whales :o

PS......He can do better!!!
The conventional view serves to protect us from the painful job of thinking."--John Kenneth Galbraith

Phil_the_Author

Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #22 on: May 16, 2006, 01:05:58 PM »
Tom,

I played it many years ago, both before and after your work was done. "Run Down" is a good and accurate description. I never knew you did the work. Good job, a really good job.


JSlonis

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #23 on: May 16, 2006, 01:26:44 PM »
Tom,

When I played it last, a couple of years ago, Piping Rock was in immaculate condition.  I'm honestly surprised to hear that it was ever in "rundown" shape.  For me, it's definitely a design that deserves to be kept up to high standards.
« Last Edit: May 16, 2006, 01:51:10 PM by JSlonis »

Jordan Wall

Re:The Big Four of NY
« Reply #24 on: May 16, 2006, 03:17:22 PM »
Maidstone also looks beautiful.  #9 is amazing, a PV hole look-alike, say with dunes on the sides of the hole instead of pits.

Aside from the fact that #9 Maidstone might be better than any hole at PV, it also happens to be situated hard by the sea in the dunes with lovely bare maidens taking the sun during the summer months.

Indeed, for a 16 year old male, #9 at The Maidstone could be considered the greatest hole in the world. :)


Only if he desires early Social X-Ray's and is willing to cede himself to cute pink whales :o

PS......He can do better!!!

Hmph.

I am not so sure anything better can be had.
 ::) 8) ;D

Piping Rock is a very cool looking courses, and the greens look brutal.  The redan bunker is one of the deepest I have ever seen in my life.  12 feet is no bargain.