News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


TEPaul

The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« on: April 10, 2006, 06:24:38 AM »
I just noticed one reason Tom Doak supplied why more clubs may never provide more short courses like Cruden's St Olaf---eg they generally compete for space with practice ranges.

Although the historical reasons are all obvious why they were almost never originally provided in maybe the first 3/4 of the entire 150 years of GCA, is there any doubt that the failure to provide space for practice ranges was the single biggest glitch in architecture's history?

No one can blame the early architects and golf course planners because practice balls and range practicing virtually never existed for so long but is there any single item in the history of golf course architecture that was responsible for the redesigning of old courses like the lack of practice ranges?

When I think of all the old courses in my area this problem has affected probably 90% of them at least, including my own.

The old saw in real estate is location, location, location. The historical saw in GCA should've been land, land, land.

Frankly, the only two courses I can think of right now that dodged this bullet right out of the box are PVGC and my old club, Piping Rock. Piping's massive practice range was originally two old polo fields next to the clubhouse that preceded the golf course.

Macdonald wanted to take those polo fields for golf holes and the club wouldn't give them to him which infuruiated Macdonald. Their refusal was obviously more fortunate than they ever could've imagined back then.  ;)
« Last Edit: April 10, 2006, 06:28:12 AM by TEPaul »

ForkaB

Re:The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2006, 07:15:39 AM »
Tom

Not unsurprisingly, I think you have it bass ackwards!

The glitch was with the "game" and not GCA.  Who was the first idiot who stood up at some Committee/Board meeting and said, in effect:

"Let's f*** up our golf course and put a driving range in the middle of it!"

????

 :'( :o

TEPaul

Re:The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2006, 12:42:30 PM »
Rich:

As usual, you seem incapable of comprehending reality and the reality of evolution which becomes our history.

Who was the idiot who came up with the idea of crisscrossing our beautiful countries with rail lines, and highways for automobiles, who defiled our air and our skies with airplanes?

Like most everyone on here it seems to be necessary for you to not just to look at some of our evolutions to understand why they happened the way they did but to always find someone to blame for them.

;)
« Last Edit: April 10, 2006, 12:43:35 PM by TEPaul »

ForkaB

Re:The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« Reply #3 on: April 10, 2006, 01:05:23 PM »
Tommy

Only you could attach a moral equivalence to the Interstate Highway System and driving ranges.  Tom Doak didn't use the phrase "mat rats" for nothing. ;)

Driving ranges on the Boston Post Road jammed in between a Dairy Queen and a petting zoo are OK.  Driving ranges on or near golf courses are an abomination (although I must admit that the one at Gulph Mills is the least abominable one of that ilk that I have seen).

TEPaul

Re:The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« Reply #4 on: April 10, 2006, 03:31:45 PM »
Driving ranges on the Boston Post Road jammed in between a Dairy Queen and a petting zoo are OK.  Driving ranges on or near golf courses are an abomination (although I must admit that the one at Gulph Mills is the least abominable one of that ilk that I have seen)."

Rich:

I see you're not just as unrealistic as ever, you're more so.  ;)

A typical golfclubatlaser whose intention is always to simply "outpurist" the other purists despite lack of reality.

Furthermore, I did not realize the Interstate Highway System had any moral equivalency.  ;)
« Last Edit: April 10, 2006, 03:35:26 PM by TEPaul »

TEPaul

Re:The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« Reply #5 on: April 10, 2006, 04:05:15 PM »
The original procedure for practice or warming up at my golf course (Gulph Mills G.C. Ross, 1916) was probably completely typical.

What golfers apparently did is send their caddies down on the 18th fairway and hit all the balls in your bag at them from the rough next to the 18th green.  ;)

But the Scots probably have it right. About ten years ago I was playing in a group from my club against a group of about 12 golfers from Muirfield (including the famous Johnny Manca who was dressed in a three piece knicker suit). It was a very cold and windy day and I asked them if they'd like to hit a bag of balls to warm up before going off.

Altogether they all basically crowed; Oooh, noooo. When I asked them what they did want to do they said they'd prefer to go into the clubhouse for a wee nip or two.

Then out they came, planted their balls on the first tee---took a quick glance down the fairway and fired as the rest of them crowed "Well away, laddie."
« Last Edit: April 10, 2006, 04:08:05 PM by TEPaul »

Tim MacEachern

Re:The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« Reply #6 on: April 10, 2006, 08:48:45 PM »
Are there any courses that have decided to save on ground space by having an indoor warmup/practise/teaching area?  Nets/mesh, etc?

Tom Dunne

Re:The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« Reply #7 on: April 10, 2006, 11:38:28 PM »
Well, we'll get some interesting looks at the Hoylake driving range this summer--it's right smack in the middle of the course, and comes into play more than once as OB!

(Was it always that way? I have a hard time picturing it being there in the early days. When did the club decide to fill in some of this interior space?)

Eric Franzen

Re:The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« Reply #8 on: April 11, 2006, 05:09:30 AM »
Are there any courses that have decided to save on ground space by having an indoor warmup/practise/teaching area?  Nets/mesh, etc?

Belgrade Lakes in Maine is one of the few modern courses without a driving range that I have played.  
If I remember correctly they provided a net next to the practice green.

ForkaB

Re:The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« Reply #9 on: April 11, 2006, 06:45:31 AM »
On of my past clubs in America (Half Moon Bay, Duane/Palmer c. 1975) didn't have a driving range when it was built and still doesn't (I think) even though they've expanded it to 36 holes.

When I was there, the club allowed mulligans off the first tee for competitions, due to the lack of a range, and some of my friends used hit a few tatty balls backwards off the 1st tee across the 18th and towards the Pacific.  I can just visualise Tom Paul, John Van Der Borght and other Rules Nazis in paroxysms of conniptions as they read this..... ;)

TEPaul

Re:The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« Reply #10 on: April 11, 2006, 07:09:54 AM »
"I can just visualise Tom Paul, John Van Der Borght and other Rules Nazis in paroxysms of conniptions as they read this..... "

Rich:

You're right about that. It would be better to just ruin a couple of the holes on that ultra famous Duane/Palmer, 1975 golf course, install a full blown practice range and play by the Rules of Golf once one tees it up on the first tee.

I know that may be a radical and foreign idea to you, but anyway.....


;)

TEPaul

Re:The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« Reply #11 on: April 11, 2006, 07:15:24 AM »
Rich:

Maybe you should lead a movement to abolish all the practice ranges in the world and install in their place little nine hole mini courses. How cool would it be to play a 17 yard long par 3 "Short" and a 79 yard long par 5 Road Hole?  ;)

ForkaB

Re:The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« Reply #12 on: April 11, 2006, 08:53:05 AM »
Rich:

Maybe you should lead a movement to abolish all the practice ranges in the world and install in their place little nine hole mini courses. How cool would it be to play a 17 yard long par 3 "Short" and a 79 yard long par 5 Road Hole?  ;)

I am sooooo proud of you Grasshopper!  Finally you are beginning to understand the essence of the game of golf.  Keep it up!

Matt_Sullivan

Re:The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« Reply #13 on: April 11, 2006, 10:53:13 AM »
Like Pennard, Kingston Heath has a nice little short driving range (maybe 180 yards in length) right next to the first tee. It's short irons only, but a very civilised way to warm up before walking up to the first

Interesting thing about Kingston Heath is that its fame in part derives from being a great course on a smallish piece of land and yet they have found room for two driving ranges (the short one mentioned above and a fuller size version) and 19 holes (they have a spare par 3 hole behind the first green)

TEPaul

Re:The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« Reply #14 on: April 11, 2006, 11:08:37 AM »
Rich:

What is this 'Grasshopper' stuff? Isn't that the name the movie director told the rest of the Far Easterners in the cast that they should call that white boy in the unfortunately popular movie "Kung Fu Chicken"?
« Last Edit: April 11, 2006, 11:09:13 AM by TEPaul »

JohnV

Re:The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« Reply #15 on: April 11, 2006, 12:00:53 PM »
When I was there, the club allowed mulligans off the first tee for competitions, due to the lack of a range, and some of my friends used hit a few tatty balls backwards off the 1st tee across the 18th and towards the Pacific.  I can just visualise Tom Paul, John Van Der Borght and other Rules Nazis in paroxysms of conniptions as they read this..... ;)

My home course doesn't have a practice range although it does have an area about 120 yards long with 4 flags in it where you can hit your own balls.  Sometimes guys stray a little and hit drivers up the 17th or 18th fairways or across 11 and 12.

As for mulligans, I'd rather have you go to 18 at the Palmer course and hit them into the ocean before teeing off.

But, the best paroxsyms of Rules Nazis I've seen was at the 2000 US Mid-Amateur.  We were at the Cascades and had a 2 or 3 hour lightning delay.  The range is nowhere near the courses so it was decided by powers much higher than I that the players should be allowed to go back on the course and hit 5 shots backwards from their current location.  There were many Rules folks who where shocked beyond belief about this although it was the most practical solution to get the guys a little warmup and allowed us to finish the stroke play on time.

ForkaB

Re:The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« Reply #16 on: April 11, 2006, 12:09:11 PM »
When I was there, the club allowed mulligans off the first tee for competitions, due to the lack of a range, and some of my friends used hit a few tatty balls backwards off the 1st tee across the 18th and towards the Pacific.  I can just visualise Tom Paul, John Van Der Borght and other Rules Nazis in paroxysms of conniptions as they read this..... ;)

My home course doesn't have a practice range although it does have an area about 120 yards long with 4 flags in it where you can hit your own balls.  Sometimes guys stray a little and hit drivers up the 17th or 18th fairways or across 11 and 12.

As for mulligans, I'd rather have you go to 18 at the Palmer course and hit them into the ocean before teeing off.

But, the best paroxsyms of Rules Nazis I've seen was at the 2000 US Mid-Amateur.  We were at the Cascades and had a 2 or 3 hour lightning delay.  The range is nowhere near the courses so it was decided by powers much higher than I that the players should be allowed to go back on the course and hit 5 shots backwards from their current location.  There were many Rules folks who where shocked beyond belief about this although it was the most practical solution to get the guys a little warmup and allowed us to finish the stroke play on time.

Great stuff, John.  And you know that I use the term "Rules Nazi" for you (and even TEP!) with respect and affection.

TEPaul

Re:The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« Reply #17 on: April 11, 2006, 12:52:02 PM »
"There were many Rules folks who where shocked beyond belief about this although it was the most practical solution to get the guys a little warmup and allowed us to finish the stroke play on time."

My God, can you blame them for being shocked beyond belief?? That must be the lowpoint in the entire history of the USGA. Practical solutions and finishing on time has nothing whatsoever to do with it---THE Rules of Golf are THE RULES OF GOLF for Keeriist Sakes! If time was such a big deal put the damn field out in the thunder and lightening. It's far more appropriate that the entire field be killed by lightening than to allow the "Tournament Committee" to violate Rule 7.

JohnV

Re:The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« Reply #18 on: April 11, 2006, 01:01:38 PM »
Play was suspended at the time that they were allowed to hit the shots, therefore players are allowed to practice in designated areas.  It just so happened that the entire course was designated for a specific kind of shot (full shots in a direction that wasn't the normal one for the golf course).  Nobody was hitting a shot to a green they hadn't played or in any direction they yet to play.  The only other option would have been to allow them no warmup and that was felt to be a worse solution given the length of the delay.  I was surprised by it, but in looking back at it I think it was a practical solution.

ForkaB

Re:The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« Reply #19 on: April 11, 2006, 03:29:52 PM »
John

That was beautiful logic, and the solution leads to unglitching TEP's glitch!

Fuggedabout driving ranges--just allow for players to warm up by hitting the ball backwards over the main course for as many holes as they like.  For Monty or Daly it might mean just a few holes, but for Vijay maybe a full bass ackward 18 or even 36!  Since the USGA apparently has adjudicated that playing backwards does not constitue "practice," all sorts of possibilities open up.  Come to think of it, my pals who drove backwards from the 1st tee at HMB were not so daft after all.......

TEPaul

Re:The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« Reply #20 on: April 11, 2006, 07:46:37 PM »
John Vander Borght:

The "Tournament Committee", or anyone on it, who came up with that 'practical' solution and thereby countermanded everything that is known and sacred about Rule 7, and in complete contravention of any known Local Rule or even any reasonable interpretation of any known Decison, should be brought back to St Andrews in hand and ankle cuffs and fed to the hungry dogs in the dark and dingy side-streets.

Just remember, when it comes to THE Rules of Golf, every single jot of them----"all roads lead to Rome!!!"

Justin_Zook

Re:The biggest glitch in GCA's evolution
« Reply #21 on: April 11, 2006, 11:26:48 PM »
This is slightly off topic but still within the sphere.  I'd like to tell you a driving range story.  I am from Lititz, PA.  A great town, but a certain driving range in the area made a really peculiar demand.  

This was a long time ago, but I was playing from the natural grass tee and doing nothing out of the ordinary when an older lady (who was in charge) demanded that I stop making divots in the grass.  I inquired as to what all the other small bare spots were in the turf and she didn't really respond in a way that I felt was kind.  

Go figure...
We make a living by what we get...we make a life by what we give.

Tags: