News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Robert Mercer Deruntz

  • Karma: +0/-0
Rye or Maidstone?
« on: September 28, 2005, 09:50:05 AM »
Maidstone is a great course, but it is overrated when compared to several unrated links in the UK.  I was absolutely blown away by Rye--quite literally for an hour--3-4 club wind.  Rye may have the best set of 3's in golf!  I wonder if the par 68 causes a bad bias.  By the way, there were a couple of stakes for new tee locations--one making 17 possibly play 240.  Two new tees were already open--13 and 8.

Thomas_Brown

Re:Rye or Maidstone?
« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2005, 11:44:51 AM »
Rye by 2 or 3 lengths.
Rye's only weakness is holes seemed 10-12 out of character.

Tiger_Bernhardt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Rye or Maidstone?
« Reply #2 on: September 28, 2005, 11:50:33 AM »
Rye is one of the great courses in the world period. It is without competition except from Royal St. Georges in SW England. I also find 10 to 12 out of character.

henrye

Re:Rye or Maidstone?
« Reply #3 on: September 28, 2005, 12:02:53 PM »
Tiger, I think you have to consider Deal a competitor.  Rye's strength is its par 3's.  Holes 10 and 11 are certainly not strong, but I think 12 is a fine hole.

I don't know how one compares Rye to St. George's.  They are so different.  What I find in Deal is that it is somewhat of a middle ground between the 2, and it works beautifully.  There are no holes out of character at Deal.

Matt_Ward

Re:Rye or Maidstone?
« Reply #4 on: September 28, 2005, 06:41:53 PM »
For those who have played Rye -- I hope to visit the southeast area of England next summer -- and will want to play all the gems in the area -- can those "in the know" rate for me where they see Rye finishing among the following ...

1). The top courses in England

2). The top courses in all of the UK

Is it fair to say it is the best par-68 layout period given the nature of the par-4's that I have heard from those who have played there.

Many thanks for any info provided.

P.S. For what it's worth -- Maidstone is a bit overrated in my book minus the grand dunes holes encountered in the middle of the rounf there.

henrye

Re:Rye or Maidstone?
« Reply #5 on: September 29, 2005, 12:29:18 PM »
Matt, I hope that Mark Rowlinson will respond here, but based on my limited experience, the courses are all so different that it's difficult to compare.  Here's my attempt for London area courses I visited.

1. Sunningdale Old - haven't played the New
2. Deal, Sandwich, Swinley - 3 way tie
3. Walton Heath Old
4. Wentworth West
5. Rye

That said, I have never found anyone who has ever agreed with my opinions on golf courses.  I should add that although Rye ranks 5th on my list, it is delightfully unique, and if you get a chance to go it is certainly worth a visit.

Mark_Rowlinson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Rye or Maidstone?
« Reply #6 on: September 29, 2005, 12:39:34 PM »
Matt,

I'm not going to get involved in rating the courses, but in the South-East there are really three you have to play, Royal St George's, Royal Cinque Ports and Rye.  If, after that, you have any money left then work your way back to South-West London by playing West Sussex and Royal Ashdown Forest.  I'd say The Addington should not be missed (south-east rather than south-west London) and you could play it on your way to or from the coast.  After that the must-plays for my taste are Sunningdale (both courses), Swinley Forest, Walton Heath (both courses), St George's Hill and perhaps one of Woking, West Hill, New Zealand, Liphook.  You can drive through the Wentworth estate and view most holes on the West Course from the comfort of your car and it will save you an arm and leg.  You can also drive into Stoke Park and see what you need to of the course (now 27 holes) and do homage to Goldfinger, but don't bother to play it.  

Michael Moore

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Rye or Maidstone?
« Reply #7 on: September 29, 2005, 01:05:08 PM »
P.S. For what it's worth -- Maidstone is a bit overrated in my book minus the grand dunes holes encountered in the middle of the round there.

Did they make you skip those holes?
Metaphor is social and shares the table with the objects it intertwines and the attitudes it reconciles. Opinion, like the Michelin inspector, dines alone. - Adam Gopnik, The Table Comes First

Marc Haring

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Rye or Maidstone?
« Reply #8 on: September 29, 2005, 01:45:36 PM »
Matt

I did the trip last year and we played Chart Hills day one, next Deal and RSG's in that order, then Littlestone and Rye on day three and followed up with Royal Ashdown Foerest on the way back. It was superb, quite magical but in the perfect world I would remove Chart Hills and Littlestone and add in Sunningdale and maybe Walton Heath.

I've plenty of pics if anyone wants a taster but be quick as I'm flying out to France tommorow morning to sample Bill Coore's Medoc amongst others and whilst in the vicinity we might partake of the odd glass of what the area has to offer.

Matt_Ward

Re:Rye or Maidstone?
« Reply #9 on: September 29, 2005, 03:00:32 PM »
Gents:

Thanks for the info but it seems too many of you are doing some artful tap dancing and not going far below the surface of your analysis.

As a par-68 what specifically makes the course so grand.

As George Constanza said to Jerry .. "I want details Jerry."

Michael M:

I like Maidstone but frankly it gets a good bit of mileage because of its tony zip code and the shared neighborhood with the likes of Shinnecock Hills, NGLA and Friar's Head.

The dunes holes are exceptional but there's plenty of mediocrity for a so-called top 100 layout.

Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Rye or Maidstone?
« Reply #10 on: September 29, 2005, 03:28:09 PM »
Matt

I am not sure what sort of detail you would like.  For my money, Sandwich is streets ahead.  I would put Sandwich top 10 in the UK and top 5 in England.  It has variety.  Nuff said.  

To me, saying a course is par 68 or 75 is meaningless as to the quality.  Par means nada baby.  Now, if you want to play a course that is tough as old boots, then Deal is your chap.  On a calmish day, I reckon Deal is in a dead heat with Rye.  Both have their funky moments, but Rye has the one shotters.  If there is any real wind, Deal is a nightmare slog coming home.  I don't care for this sort of Troonish golf (ie driver 3 wood, driver,  three wood... I am sorry, was I perseverating?).  I still think the way to see Rye is in the winter.  Rye is a great winter course.  Go watch The President's Putter then play the course.  I freely admit to never having played Rye in the summer.  So Matt, if you get a game there next summer, give me a call.  Edge goes to Rye.

Another tier down is Princes and Littlestone.  Both well worth a go.  Though they are quite different.  Littlestone has the best holes (#s 16 & 17 are outstanding) of the two, but I think Princes is a better sum of its parts.  Edge goes to Princes.  Word of warning, I would take Princes over Deal because I know the chances of playing Deal in the calm are slim and none.  

Matt, don't forget about Hayling.  It is a serious sleeper and out of the London airport loop, but it may very pleasantly surprise you.  If you are heading to Pulborough, which you owe it to yourself to do, then chuck in Hayling.  

As for the Heathland courses, Mark is well and truly spot on.  

Last word, get yourself a good loan if you are thinking of playing even half the courses mentioned!

Ciao

Sean

 
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing

Matt_Ward

Re:Rye or Maidstone?
« Reply #11 on: September 29, 2005, 05:42:16 PM »
Shivas & Sean:

Now -- that's the kind of details that I appreciate. Thanks for sharing your preferences and what else needs to be visited. I will make note of it all and if time permits I'll take you up on your offer Sean.

That's provided you don't mind playing with an American "cracker." ;D

Gents:

One further question -- how important is it for a "great" course to have a mixture of different par type holes -- especially par-5's. Rye seems to attack that theory with the belief that a strong dose of lengthy and demanding par-4's is the preferred route to go.

George Pazin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Rye or Maidstone?
« Reply #12 on: September 29, 2005, 05:51:21 PM »
Matt, I don't know if you're aware of this or not, but Ran has a very compelling writeup on Rye:

http://www.golfclubatlas.com/rye1.html

(Offered in an earnest attempt to help, not trying to be a smartass :))

There's also a terrific writeup in The Confidential Guide..., but I'm sure you knew that.

Sounds like there are some real ballbuster par 3s and 4s - I'd be curious to learn your take.
Big drivers and hot balls are the product of golf course design that rewards the hit one far then hit one high strategy.  Shinny showed everyone how to take care of this whole technology dilemma. - Pat Brockwell, 6/24/04