The pros eat up Warwick Hills big time almost every year. Still, 11 under is scary good.

Back to back eagles on a 5 and a 4 never hurts a round.

Note to Phil Blackmar;

Narrow tree lined fairways, with soft greens closely surrounded with deep rough, does not a substantial test make.

somehow 30 under par (possible) does not excite me.

Another indication of a Tour venue being hopelessly overpowered?

Adam:

Maybe it was a good test, the #1 and 2 players ended up first and second.

Cary

Adam:

Maybe it was a good test, the #1 and 2 players ended up first and second.

Cary

You mean second and first, don't you?

What's the over/under on Tiger at Baltusrol?  I'll bet with those wafer thin fairways and pasture-deep roughs he's going to spend the PGA in recovery mode and not finish in the top 30.

What do you think?

jaycee

I'll take the under for a thousand![/color]

JES II

I'll take half your action

Adam:

Boring, but still 1 and 2

Jim

You are sharp my boy, 2 and 1, but still 1 and 2 anyway you look at it

Cary

Honestly Cary, I thought it was exciting. 24 under par, and Tiger hitting driver every hole, is the kind of action Finchem and Buick need to keep ratings up.
And it's that kind of action, Hootie and the boys, have gauranteed for the weekend, with their set-ups. Having one of IMG's superstars on the tube for eight hours over the weekend isn't a bad thing, is it?

But please don't be sucked into the notion that the gca is compelling, just because the course is on TV.

JES II

I'll take half your action

Cary

I get Tiger in the top 30 and you get everything outside of that? That's what I mean by the under.

Jamie,

I figured I had to clarify my post #14 with post #20 because the bet seemed to strange. I'll even let you in on half of Cary's actino if you want. It's no guarantee, but it sure looks like a pretty good bet.