That Ron Whitten is still the head of the Golf Digest ratings panel.
I don't jump onto these rater bashing threads too often, but this Golf Digest panel has no direction. How can you pull "Tradition" and not tell your raters? I understand statistics well enough to know the problems with looking as to why a course moved from 35 to 25 or vice versa.
However if you are in charge of a ratings panel, and they can't see the difference between Friar's Head and Atlantic, then you are not educating your panelist. I have defended Atlantic many times in this website. Yes I like a Ress Jones course.
However, Friar's Head was blessed with one of the most unique sites on the East Coast. Farmland, dunes, water, wind, trees, open space. It is not fair to even compare with Atlantic which has a wonderful farmland only site.
Statistically I understand how these things happen, but sorry they have an education problem at Golf Digest. If Cypress Point is #4, and that is with tradition thrown out, and Friar's Head is #14 in New York behind Atlantic, then the head of the panel needs to make some drastic changes or step down.
By the way, do any of the raters read Ron's column? Certainly they did not agree with his view of CC of Buffalo when Whitten said, "When it comes to early-American "quarry courses," I like it better than the far more famous Merion East. It may lack Merion's tournament history, but Buffalo's quarry holes are more intriguing, and it has four times as many of them."
Yet, CC of Buffalo does not even make the New York list. By the way, I love his reviews, I am only questioning his leadership. Brad is a little whacky, but he clearly sets a tighter agenda at GolfWeek.