Mark,
Although the term "cape" hole often carries the connotation you suggest, holes like Mid Ocean 5 and Cuscowilla 10 are not true "cape" holes. See the first Feature Interview with George Bahto for the correct definition
Mark:
Turns out that while what Doug says may be "technically" correct, it's either a little high handed or just plain lazy for him to give you the GB reference and not just put it out there in his own words (yes, Doug, that would be a direct challenge, what's your most mis-used GCA term?). A "Cape" hole like 10 at Cuscowilla is not really a "Cape" hole b/c while the tee shot is off set and rewards a "bite off what you can chew" target line, a true "Cape" hole requires hazards on at least three sides of the green. The tee shot on a "Cape" hole can therefore have little risk reward element and yet the second shot can be to a green that shoots out into the water, or a massive bunker and, if three sides of the green are a "hazard," you more or less have a "Cape" hole.
I imagine that if the 10th green at Cuscowilla were perched out into the lake with water in front, back and on the right side, 10 at Cuscowilla would be one of the greatest "Cape" holes ever!
I think C&C named the five par 5th at the Plantation Course "Cape" and most would think it's b.c of the tee shot, but the green actually sits in a swale with hazard from front right to back middle left of the green.
In fact, if one considers the big ugly house behind the back of 10 green at Pebble a hazard (AS ALL SHOULD) that's definitely a "Cape" hole!!
Just goes to show you never know what passes for a hazard nowadays!!!