The ACE Club is fantastic
If your definition of fantastic is
BIG
BIG fast greens without contour
Plays easier than it looks
Lots of downhill shots and visibility
Long, but doesn't play long
Perfect conditions
Unwalkable in a reasonable amount of time for a 53 year old cripple
Stylish, but full of what passes for character instead of real character
My opinion of White Manor and Stonewall Udder vs. ACE (Unsolicited) is at least an order of magnitude for White Manor and Stonewall North (Udder) at least two orders of magnitude better. Stonewall Udder is for some a better course than the first Stonewall depending on tastes. They are rather different.
I can barely give the ACE a Doak 4.
I have no idea about their financials. It is a very pleasant place to play golf and very stunningly beautiful - but not much in the way of anything strategic or unique. There are even a few really ho-hum to weak spots.
Redanman,
Let’s address your criticisms here...
BIG fast greens without contour
They certainly are big and fast (not negatives in my book), but they are by no means flat. #9 comes to mind immediately as a green with some interesting contours and most have subtle breaks that are also influenced by the slope of the property.
Plays easier than it looks
I agree with this point... if you play smart, conservative golf from the correct set of tees you can score. But is that a negative? Try playing from the tips at 7500+ yds with a little wind and the rough up...
Lots of downhill shots and visibility
Again, not necessarily a negative in my book. You have to take it in context with the rest of the course. #5 is a wonderful, shortish par 4 where the downhill tee shot brings strategy into play. The bunker in the middle of the fairway forces you to decide whether or not to lay up short right, go to the left of the bunker to a smallish sliver of fairway or try to drive the green. I also enjoyed the down hill par 3 on the back, #14 with a ravine fronting the green. Bethpage Black is another course with downhill shots (#1, #4, #5, 2nd shot on #6, #8, #16, #18) and visibility, and it doesn't detract from the experience there.
Long, but doesn't play long
The downhill shots, conditioning, and length of the par 5's certainly help. However, you have to drive the ball well (#3 & #7 are both tough drives from the tips) and there are a few shortish par 4's that can also jump up and bite you. #8 is a great example - 337 yds, uphill from the white tees and plenty of slope in the green and a shaved chipping area short left.
Perfect conditions
Agreed - with the exception of the 9th fairway which was being repaired when I was there.
Unwalkable in a reasonable amount of time for a 53 year old cripple
Totally agree - the #1 criticism I have of the course. Jason, if you don't think it’s possible to create a course that's not walkable on that property... just wait. The walk from #5 to #6 is ridiculous and it is definitely the routing, not the topography that caused this issue. I have seen very walkable courses on land similar to this (The GC at Glen Mills comes to mind).
Stylish, but full of what passes for character instead of real character
Please explain this statement a little more. "What passes for character" and "Real Character" means different things to different people, so I don't want to assume your definitions here.
Finally, I do think there a few average to below average holes in the design. #1 is a relatively easy start (which I rather like), #4 is a bland par 3, and I was not a big fan of #15 or the semi-blind downhill tee shot on #11. However, I did like the par 5 finishing hole, with the pond right of the green.
I am not directing this at you Redanman, but sometimes I think people prematurely dismiss courses like this because of the over-the-top nature of the facilities and the notion that they moved a lot of earth in the construction. I wish more people would take a “tabula rasa” approach to courses and just evaluate the course based upon the merits of the design and the experience they have on the property rather than focusing on how the course was constructed. In addition, contrary to some opinions on this board, I truly believe it is possible to have a modern looking golf course (even one that moves a lot of earth in its construction) which is also a quality design.