Here's my elephant path.
Below is an aerial image of my home course as a kid, the Breezy Point Whitebirch course in Minnesota, 15th hole. It's a short par 5 with like 50+ feet of elevation change. First, the letter "A" in the image below is about 20+ feet above position "B" (and it is a very narrow ridge). Additionally the
green is about 20+ feet higher than position A. Also, it could sometimes be wet in the low area left of A, so they marked that area as a hazard, denoted by the red line.
Breezy Point WB 15 by
goerges_family, on Flickr
What I learned through experience is that you had an almost equal chance of par from position A in 2 shots as position B in 1 shot, just because of the height difference and shorter angle. So I'd shoot for position A and if I stayed out of the hazard, I had a pretty easy shot at the green in 2 and a chance at eagle and a very possible birdie. If I overcooked it into the hazard, I'd take my drop and hit my mid-iron to the green (in 3) and often make par. Position B was also a likely par because the height difference, likely hanging lie and mid-long iron I had to hit, almost always meant a wedge third shot and a couple putts, because if I didn't somehow get it on the green, it would roll way back down.
In honesty, not a great hole design, but could be fun, and discovering a kind of golf hack was pretty cool to me as a young teen. Hopefully that makes sense as a
conceptual elephant path...
Edit: I should also say that tee placement on the day would affect whether I would use this strategy or not. I might be able to track down some ground-level shots if anyone is interested.