Kris,
Thanks for posting. And it is too bad that we were not able to proceed with the restoration that you proposed. As you know, the routing is superb with no truly weak holes and many distinctive ones. I have spent enough time in the Ross Archives to know that the greens as originally designed were special. The current greens are still very good and challenging, but some do suffer from your point about build up.
Ira
If the original Ross greens were good why did Maxwell alter so many? Additionally, why didn't Maxwell create more interesting greens? The situation of the greens has long stumped me considering both Ross and Maxwell were known for building highly creative, interesting and challenging greens.
Ciao
Sean,
Do you really find the greens at HVCC to be lacking in creativity, interest, and challenge?
I’m at a loss if that’s the case; to me, HVCC has all of that, plus perfect conditions and Tour level speeds. In fact, I have a friend who is on the LPGA Tour; she requested and received playing privileges at HVCC several years ago because she believes those greens to be the closest thing to Tour quality and challenge that she can find anywhere in the area.
I don’t find it surprising that the contours are perhaps “softer” than what Ross built in 1926. I’d guess (and it’s onlu that!) that Ross grassed those greens with common Bermuda; if that’s the case, then I also wouldn’t find it surprising if it turned out that contours had to be softened when HVCC converted to bent. And as I’ve already said, at current speeds, if there was any more contour, they’d lose a lot of pin positions.
It’s a great golf course, arguably one of the most underrated in NC, if not the country. And the greens, IMO, are largely what elevate it to that level.