How was the 10th at Riviera received when it was built? I don't know how much the hole has changed, but I can't imagine hitting 1930s clubs and balls into that green. Even with slower greens, it would be extremely tough to hold a 70 - 100 yard shot into tat shallow green I would think.
There is an old photo of the 10th green without any bunker at the front right, but I think the hole only existed that way for a short time before the bunker was added ... maybe even before the course was formally opened. Anyway, I have never heard much discussion of that hole as "controversial". In the early days it would have been more necessary to play to the left off the tee and get a good line into the green so you could hold it, but it wasn't extremely tough as long as you were playing into the length of the green. In the 1960's and 70's the hole was dismissed as too easy - the chairman of the USGA Green Section recommended blowing it up and making a better hole! - but it still wasn't controversial for golfers at large. Now of course it's untouchable.
When I played in the 90s, I didn’t feel like 10 at Riviera was much to think about.
But, the course conditions,were basically atrocious back then imo. The greens were bumpy and soft. Hitting a decent tee shot in the left half of the fairway rarely if ever left a short shot with fear, the greens were just so receptive, and not to get too intomequipment, the stuff we played was spinning way more.
Now they have the conditions just amazing.
The fairways actually run a bit, but the firmness of the greens puts a lot more premium on hitting an approach the perfect distance, from a good angle.
I was shocked when I saw the old photo of 10 without the bunker right