Completely off topic:
Those photographs of the individual holes that Frank posted are very curious. They appear to have been taken from treetop level which leaves me wondering how the photographer got there. Pretty low for a flyover. Too open and unobstructed for a tree climber. My guess is that they are crane shots given the golfers are so well positioned. It also occurs to me that they could have been done by balloon or helicopter. Were mobile cranes and cherry pickers common in those days (no idea when they were taken)? If they were for KLM, the chopper expense makes more sense.
This brings up a question I always wanted to ask golf photographers: do you prefer this POV that shows the entire hole, no matter the terraine, or one from the golfer's level? I know it depends, but when estimating a shoot, do you budget for a cherry picker or chopper?
BTW, and even more off topic, we did a photo shoot once where we used an old piston engine chopper as a prop. You know those old Plexiglas bubble cockpits with the erector set tail section to the tail rotor. The location was Monument Valley in the spring. The wind was howling and we were having a hell of a time getting the chopper positioned for the shot because just as the pilot would get close, he’d bail out. During a break I asked the pilot to take me up so that I could shoot a few aerials. I lasted about five minutes in that death trap, the aerial equivalent of white water rafting, tumbling and dropping in those swirling air rapids. Talk about a vomit comet. Into the wind the top ground speed was about 20 mph. Not a fun camera platform.