Does it matter in the slightest what the pros do?
Ciao
Well, this was a course that was built for the pros to play on, so I presume if there is any course in the world where it does matter what the pros do then I guess it would be this one.
The fact of the matter is that this course plays not as Dye originally intended; both in terms of length and presentation. I thought this group was all about preserving the designers original intent? If the 9th was meant to be unreachable in 2 shots then that is what was intended.
This site may be about preserving designer original intent, but I ain't gonna be painted with such a limited brush. Besides...how long can we keep extending courses to preserve intent? Courses would be approaching 8000 yards if we really tried to do this.
Besides II, we had a nice chap explain how he layed up on many holes...back in the 90s.
I also question how many rounds the pros play at Sawgrass compared to hacks. There is a tournament there every year, but does it pay the bills?
Ciao
Sean,
In the case oF TPC Sawgrass, the course was BUILT to host the TPC, and much like The Masters, hosts a pro event every year which is the driving force behind its cache.
Hosting the TPC is their best marketing device-without the event it would soon fade as a destination course-like many others before it. So the pros do "matter in the slightest" in this instance.
The bills are paid by the tourists who flock to play a course made famous and relevent by the TPC event-that pros play in.
How relevant/profitable is the old Sawgrass course now that they no longer play it?
I will say it's an interesting event, regardless of layups-when hitting a 3 iron 280 it still has to be well and accurately struck as it is still going 280
While I often beat the rollback drumbeat, this course isn't really the poster child for it-It's really not my cup of tea anyway as far as playing golf-though it does have some interesting individual features.