News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Garland Bayley

  • Karma: +0/-0
"For my money, Chambers Bay might do it best. It is wide open, has few forced carries, has a slope from the back tees of only 135 – and yet knocked the world’s best amateur players to their knees in last summer’s qualifying rounds for the U.S. Am when the average score of the field one day was 80."

http://www.thepnga.org/sites/courses/viewHeadlineNews.asp?id=235

« Last Edit: August 10, 2011, 10:52:45 AM by Garland Bayley »
"I enjoy a course where the challenges are contained WITHIN it, and recovery is part of the game  not a course where the challenge is to stay ON it." Jeff Warne

Garland Bayley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Building Smarter, NOT HARDER, Some thoughts from John Harbottle.
« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2011, 10:58:29 AM »
I hope people didn't overlook this thread and the linked article, because they thought it was just me promoting Chambers Bay again. So I'll bump it just this one time.

I started the thread, because we don't hear too much from or about Harbottle here. Here's a quote directly from him.

“Variety is more important than mere length, and interest more important than difficulty. I think we are clearly seeing a trend back toward Golden Era values in today's new designs and renovations. They are simply more playable, maintainable and sustainable.”
"I enjoy a course where the challenges are contained WITHIN it, and recovery is part of the game  not a course where the challenge is to stay ON it." Jeff Warne

Anthony Gray

Re: Building Smarter, NOT HARDER, Some thoughts from John Harbottle.
« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2011, 11:13:35 AM »
I hope people didn't overlook this thread and the linked article, because they thought it was just me promoting Chambers Bay again. So I'll bump it just this one time.

I started the thread, because we don't hear too much from or about Harbottle here. Here's a quote directly from him.

“Variety is more important than mere length, and interest more important than difficulty. I think we are clearly seeing a trend back toward Golden Era values in today's new designs and renovations. They are simply more playable, maintainable and sustainable.”

  This quote sums up how I rate a course. I agree 100%. Cruden Bay is not long has the most variety in golf and tons of interest.

  Anthony


Pete Lavallee

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Building Smarter, NOT HARDER, Some thoughts from John Harbottle.
« Reply #3 on: August 10, 2011, 12:40:12 PM »
Perhaps the key to interesting golf is to have the intials CB for the golf course!
"...one inoculated with the virus must swing a golf-club or perish."  Robert Hunter

Garland Bayley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Building Smarter, NOT HARDER, Some thoughts from John Harbottle.
« Reply #4 on: August 10, 2011, 12:46:11 PM »
Perhaps the key to interesting golf is to have the intials CB for the golf course!

10-4 big buddy!
"I enjoy a course where the challenges are contained WITHIN it, and recovery is part of the game  not a course where the challenge is to stay ON it." Jeff Warne

Tiger_Bernhardt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Building Smarter, NOT HARDER, Some thoughts from John Harbottle.
« Reply #5 on: August 10, 2011, 02:28:42 PM »
call Mike Young  He is one of several the wise GCA men on this subject

Kalen Braley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Building Smarter, NOT HARDER, Some thoughts from John Harbottle.
« Reply #6 on: August 10, 2011, 02:41:05 PM »
Garland,

I can't help but partially think those are empty words.  If he truly were about Golden Age values, then why did he build such flat greens at Palouse Ridge, when that place screamed out for undulating ones to match the rest of the course and the site for that matter.

This is just my opinion, but I think he gave in to the stimp meter race combined with the fact that it'll host a lot D1 golf play where the players would whine like babies thats its unfair if they had undulating greens.  But perhaps they just take thier cues from the big boys on Tour.

Garland Bayley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Building Smarter, NOT HARDER, Some thoughts from John Harbottle.
« Reply #7 on: August 10, 2011, 03:59:10 PM »
Garland,

I can't help but partially think those are empty words.  If he truly were about Golden Age values, then why did he build such flat greens at Palouse Ridge, when that place screamed out for undulating ones to match the rest of the course and the site for that matter.

This is just my opinion, but I think he gave in to the stimp meter race combined with the fact that it'll host a lot D1 golf play where the players would whine like babies thats its unfair if they had undulating greens.  But perhaps they just take thier cues from the big boys on Tour.

??? Marching orders ???

When I played there, I couldn't help think his design had to be influenced by a PAC-10 college that would be least able to recruit golfers. Perhaps he thought one way would be flat greens to help weak putters equalize with better players. Or, hitting approaches from bad angles?
"I enjoy a course where the challenges are contained WITHIN it, and recovery is part of the game  not a course where the challenge is to stay ON it." Jeff Warne

David Kelly

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Building Smarter, NOT HARDER, Some thoughts from John Harbottle.
« Reply #8 on: August 10, 2011, 04:04:07 PM »
Harbottle's work at Brookside Golf Course in Pasadena has been pretty unimpressive and they have spent a lot of money on the renovations.
"Whatever in creation exists without my knowledge exists without my consent." - Judge Holden, Blood Meridian.

Kalen Braley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Building Smarter, NOT HARDER, Some thoughts from John Harbottle.
« Reply #9 on: August 10, 2011, 04:12:49 PM »
Garland,

I can't help but partially think those are empty words.  If he truly were about Golden Age values, then why did he build such flat greens at Palouse Ridge, when that place screamed out for undulating ones to match the rest of the course and the site for that matter.

This is just my opinion, but I think he gave in to the stimp meter race combined with the fact that it'll host a lot D1 golf play where the players would whine like babies thats its unfair if they had undulating greens.  But perhaps they just take thier cues from the big boys on Tour.

??? Marching orders ???

When I played there, I couldn't help think his design had to be influenced by a PAC-10 college that would be least able to recruit golfers. Perhaps he thought one way would be flat greens to help weak putters equalize with better players. Or, hitting approaches from bad angles?


Well that's what I was thinking even if I didn't go as far to speculate thats what actually happened. ;)

 I understand its a balancing act to give the customer what they want, vs putting the best course in the ground...but it seems like they could have compromised to have at least have somewhat interesting greens.