Roger,
The elevation changes are one of the best aspects of CCNC Dogwood - it's a great piece of property. I think they are a great template of how to do housing on golf courses - lots are all very large (at least 1-2 acres), well set back from the holes and camouflaged by the woods, and never really come into play. I don't think there's internal out of bounds anywhere except the driving range off #1 in case of a wicked slice. The housing is done in such a way that you don't really notice it at all. Just a very peaceful walk through the woods, very walkable but I don't think you can ever see one hole from another. It's very easy to putt out on #18 with the same ball you started with on #1, but still shoot way over your handicap.
There's a great cross-hazard on the par 4, #15, if you miss the fairway in the summer (which I always seem to do), the combination of a longer iron approach and the thick bermuda rough make that a definite consideration. If you hit the fairway it's pretty much a non-factor.
Also water in play on the 1st par 5, #5, and #18. #5 only comes into play if you challenge the green in 2 or hit a terrible 3rd, and off the tee on #18. I think #18 is the worst hole on the course, nothing strategic to the hole, just gets you back to the clubhouse and straight uphill on the 2nd and 3rd.
John,
Played NCSU again last weekend. The group assessment was WAY too much sand in the bunkers, nearly every shot that got near one resulted in a buried lie, 6 of 7 for me, which made any type of recovery shot near impossible. Tough to make a fair assessment outside of that since the bunkering is a key element of the design. I'd be very interested to see a tournament there, especially with the bunker situation. I would be very interested to see how some of the top collegiate guys get around there.
I'm a huge fan of Mid Pines, played it once and just absolutely loved it. The green complexes are incredible, challenging but not to the extreme of a #2 so a more recreational vs. tournament course. It felt very authentic as if little had changed since Ross's era. If one wants a lot of length in a course it is on the shorter end since it's an older course but I think it's plenty long enough to provide a good test. It should definitely be played from the tips for anyone 10 HCP or better. Maybe we just have different taste in designs?