Wow! I found this old thread and was amazed. Since most seemed open to the idea of "tweaking" (though I wonder when tweaking stops and major reno takes over if added bunkering, lengthened tees, greens moved and contoured are all considered!) I wonder how folks would feel about it now, in this day of seriously rising green fees (which presumably would happen if the club spent dosh on the course)? Personally, I am against the idea of any added bunkers and probably only very few extra tees would add any value. However, I could see adding some contour to the greens to a few of the greens - just to spice things up. That said, its a very dodgy business messing with a Rihcelin Guida 1* and what I would think is a very comfortable 7 (pushing 8?) on the Doak Scale. Still, I would like to hear specifics about some changes. I know one I would consider is the 9th. I never liked how the green looked so boring against such a majestic backdrop. The 4th is another candidate for some green contour. That said, thinking back on many of the greens, there is some decent movement and it would be dicey to create too much movement given the amount of wind this place can get.
Ciao