News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Rick Wolffe

  • Karma: +0/-0
Oak Hill East -- Architectural Short Summary
« on: January 05, 2009, 09:25:56 PM »
Since just finishing Oakmont, how about we stick with the the hard wood...so here is a draft of a short summary on Oak Hill East...all constructive comments, corrections and additions are most welcome.  Many thanks again to all who have made valuable contributions.


Oak Hill East – designed by Donald Ross circa 1923

Donald Ross’s famous Oak Hill East Course, was designed by Ross after the Oak Hill CC agreed to move from its original location along the banks of the Genessee River in Rochester, NY to a 355 acre site in a land swap with the University of Rochester in 1921.  Ross designed two 18-hole courses on this site and the new courses officially were opened for play in 1926.  The East course would become the famous one, hosting its first professional event in 1934.  The course’s first national championhip was the 1949 U.S. Amateur, and would be followed by the U.S. Open in 1956.  Over its history the course has hosted two U.S. Opens, two PGA Championships, a Ryder Cup and several other national championships. 

Over its history, the East course has undergone many modifications.  An extensive tree planting program was initiated shortly after the course opened.  However, George and Tom Fazio designed the most notable modifications in preparation for the 1980 PGA Championship.   This redesign has not been universally accepted by the golf media and has been subject to criticism:

Author Daniel Wexler book Lost Links he notes, “ Prior to the 1980 PGA Championship, the Fazios followed up their work at Inverness with a visit to Oak Hill, replacing holes five and six with distinctly more modern creations.  The old fifth (called “one of the best holes I ever played” by Lee Trevino) is mourned to this day.”  {Lost Links, Forgotten Treasures of Golf’s Golden Age, Clock Tower Press, 2003, p.214.} 

" Recent changes in the East Course were directed by George Fazio, golf course architect.  They were intended to bring the course up to modern championship tournament standards.  Among changes:  The par three No. 5 hole was eliminated.  A new green was built for No. 6, which became No. 5.  A new par three was built to become No. 6, strategically using the creek.  No. 15 par three green was moved down a hill and a pond was made beside it. " {From Little Acorns, Volume II, The Story of Oak Hill, 1901-1986, by Howard C. Hosmer, 1986, p.72}

" In total, four of the original Ross holes have been replaced, and “in the opinion of many, the championship East Course was to be “defiled,” some 50-odd years later by a modern architect, but still became the arena for such winning players as Jack Nicklus, Miller Barber, and Crtis Strange.  Nicklaus, who had finished second in the 1968 U.S. Open, which was played on the “old” East course, said of the George Fazio moderninzing:  “You had a great golf course here.  Well, now you two great golf courses – 14 Donald Ross holes and four Fazio holes.” " {Once Upon a Time at Oak Hill, by Bruce Koch, 1995 p.__} 

Despite these criticisms, Oak Hill most recently hosted the 1995 Ryder Cup, the 2003 PGA Championship, and the 2008 Senior PGA Championship.  In advance of the 03 PGA, the course was lengthened and these modifications were overseen by Green Superintendent Paul Latshaw who noted, “ We've installed nine new tees, lengthened the course by 230 yards (7,134 yards and par 70), recontoured the fairways to 22 to 28 yards wide, and rebuilt the bunkers, making them deeper and moving some of them closer to the playing areas and tightening up the landing areas. ”  {Staging the August 2003 PGA Championship, by Frank McAlonan, Club Management, Sunday, June 1, 2003}

TEPaul

Re: Oak Hill East -- Architectural Short Summary
« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2009, 09:47:22 PM »
Rick:

I'm not sure what your purpose is with these threads on design evolution reports on Oakmont and Oak Hill but I should tell you that, in my opinion, Oak Hill did the first "design evolution report" extant and it was a massively comprehensive one. I thought I did the first dedicated design evolution report (GMGC in 1998) but not until recently did I realize Oak Hill beat me to it by maybe a decade or more!   ;)

Ronald Montesano

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oak Hill East -- Architectural Short Summary
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2009, 09:50:38 PM »
I was just about to ask, what is the value of this thread?  It seems like a cut-and-paste dissertation from a doctoral candidate.  It doesn't pose a question nor demand an answer.  If I'm missing something, by all means, enlighten me.
Coming in 2024
~Elmira Country Club
~Soaring Eagles
~Bonavista
~Indian Hills
~Maybe some more!!

JNC Lyon

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oak Hill East -- Architectural Short Summary
« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2009, 10:53:08 PM »
This description is very brief.  It skips over a tremendous amount of information, particularly how RTJ changed the course for the 1956 US Open, as well as the rerouting of the course to construct the temporary par three 5th for the 1968 US Open.

Also, you totally forgot the West Course at Oak Hill.  I don't know how you can write a history of Oak Hill without including the West Course.
"That's why Oscar can't see that!" - Philip E. "Timmy" Thomas

Rick Wolffe

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oak Hill East -- Architectural Short Summary
« Reply #4 on: January 05, 2009, 11:04:35 PM »
Hi JNC

Thank you much for noting this ommission.  If you can, please be so kind as to share what was done in preparation for the 1956 U.S. Open and the work for the 68 US Open.

No slight is intended on the West.  The "short summaries" or briefs are only for the golden age courses which continue to host the major national tournaments staged by Golf's governing bodies.  I understand that the major championships at Oak Hill have been conducted on the East.  If I am mistaken, please let me know.

If the West has its own architectural evolution, I would be interested in learning about it, but that is not my focus as I am working on summaries of only those golden age courses which continue to host major championships.

Sorry for any confusion and thank you much again for your thoughts.


Matthew Rose

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oak Hill East -- Architectural Short Summary
« Reply #5 on: January 06, 2009, 05:33:39 AM »

Are there any threads here about the "other" courses at famous venues, like Oak Hill West?

I know Merion West gets a lot of press on this site, which I enjoy reading, but I'm also curious about some of the others, like the "other" courses like Oakland Hills North or Winged Foot East or Olympic Ocean or Medinah #1/#2. Are any of these worth discussion?

American-Australian. Trackman Course Guy. Fatalistic sports fan. Drummer. Bass player. Father. Cat lover.

John Foley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oak Hill East -- Architectural Short Summary
« Reply #6 on: January 06, 2009, 09:55:15 AM »
Rick,

Pretty sure Craig Schriener did some work there in the mid-90's. Not sure what he did and if it was when he was still with Hurdzan or on his own.

Integrity in the moment of choice

JNC Lyon

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oak Hill East -- Architectural Short Summary
« Reply #7 on: January 06, 2009, 11:02:27 AM »
Hi JNC

Thank you much for noting this ommission.  If you can, please be so kind as to share what was done in preparation for the 1956 U.S. Open and the work for the 68 US Open.

No slight is intended on the West.  The "short summaries" or briefs are only for the golden age courses which continue to host the major national tournaments staged by Golf's governing bodies.  I understand that the major championships at Oak Hill have been conducted on the East.  If I am mistaken, please let me know.

If the West has its own architectural evolution, I would be interested in learning about it, but that is not my focus as I am working on summaries of only those golden age courses which continue to host major championships.

Sorry for any confusion and thank you much again for your thoughts.



The West has hosted qualifying rounds for the US Amateur.  I'm not sure if this counts as "hosting major championships," but there should be a small mention of how the West retains its Ross charm after years of remodeling on the East.

The club is currently doing research on the architectural history of both courses.  Although we are not deep into the project, my understanding is that RTJ's changes have done a great deal to make the course what it is today.  He performed his usual tasks of tightening bunkers around the green and adding/subtracting fairway bunkers where need.  Holes 7-10, all great par fours, bear a significant mark of Trent Jones' renovation. 13 had the shape of the green changed, right fairway bunkers added, and a ring of bunkers placed around the back of the green.  These are but a few examples of his modifications, most of which remain today on the East Course.

Prior to 1968, a few changes occurred from the 1956 US Open.  The 15th tee, formerly below and to the right of the 14th green, was moved close to its present location.  This created a par three in the 160 range that played across the hillside to a green very close to the OB on the left.  More significantly, the original par three sixth was removed from the championship course (its green still remained for member practice/play).  It was replaced by another par three between the original 4th and 5th holes.  This hole was only in play for a few years, and it was deemed boring and unfit for championship play.  The hole remains a practice hole.  To accommodate the new routing, the tee at the 6th (formerly 5th, the dogleg right par four around the creek) was lengthened.  At 440, many players, including Lee Trevino, declared it was the best hole on the course.  Clearly it wasn't good enough, and it was removed by Fazio to be replaced by the current 5th (par four) and 6th holes.

John Foley is correct, Craig Schreiner did do some renovation work in the mid 1990s.  This involved recapturing greens and flashing up the bunkers.  The bunker work was entirely redone in preparation for the 2003 PGA Championship by Tom Fazio's group (not George Fazio, who was the main person responsible for the current monstrosities at 5, 6, 15, 18).  Most agree that the new bunker work is an improvement over Schreiner's work.  However, the current bunkering doesn't reflect Ross's original placement.

Overall, RTJ is responsible for a majority of the current bunkering.  14 of Ross's original, brilliant greensites remain, although many have shrunk in size and shape.  4 of the current greens are Fazio-designed, and they conspire to create the four worst holes on the course.

Oak Hill East certainly gets a lot of flack on this site.  In the past, renovations have suffered from a lack of respect for tradition.  However,  the current course, while a bit disjointed at times, still contains numerous great holes.  1, 7, 8, 9, 10, 16, and 17 are all great long fours for tournament play.  3 is a beautifully-routed long par three that manages to be a bear without water or out of bounds.  12 and 14 are first-rate short fours.  I challenge anyone to find a Ross course with two better green sites for drive and pitch holes.  13 is a grand long par five that has not succumbed to technology in 80 years.  The course remains an elegant and stiff challenge due to Ross's brilliant use of the land in his original routing.
"That's why Oscar can't see that!" - Philip E. "Timmy" Thomas