News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Garland Bayley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Three most architecturally important courses since Sawgrass
« Reply #75 on: December 31, 2008, 03:01:02 PM »
[

Sean-  can you IM Tuco please when you get a second...

Sean, don't bother.  You wont want to get dragged in or be bothered.

Have to wonder if you fellers don't know how to use the IM capability of this site.
"I enjoy a course where the challenges are contained WITHIN it, and recovery is part of the game  not a course where the challenge is to stay ON it." Jeff Warne

Garland Bayley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Three most architecturally important courses since Sawgrass
« Reply #76 on: December 31, 2008, 03:10:43 PM »
I tried to make a tally of the support for the courses. It is a little difficult given a certain amount fo hedging and overvoting, but I did as I thought best.

Sand Hills is overwhelmingly the top pick with more than twice as much support as any other course. That being said, it of course is private, so we will have to have at least three more to get the three most significant public courses. As it turns out, there is a three-way tie for the next slot. Kingsbarns, Rustic Canyon, and Whistling Straits (Straits). I guess that add support to why Pete has been so influential, as even with Sawgrass being the basis of the list, another course of his is considered tres significant by this august body.

Bandon Dunes Resort has to get special mention, because Pacific Dunes and Bandon Dunes tied for the next slot along with a couple of others. Those others being Sebonack and Shadow Creek.

If the group keeps voting, I will keep counting.
"I enjoy a course where the challenges are contained WITHIN it, and recovery is part of the game  not a course where the challenge is to stay ON it." Jeff Warne

Mike Mosely

Re: Three most architecturally important courses since Sawgrass
« Reply #77 on: December 31, 2008, 04:01:15 PM »
Public, right?  Tobacco Road, Pacific Dunes, Kiawah (Ocean)

Ian Andrew

Re: Three most architecturally important courses since Sawgrass
« Reply #78 on: December 31, 2008, 04:35:59 PM »
To me: Architecturally important = influence on the future of architecture

Sand Hills – everyone has altered their style if not reassessed their outlook on architecture because of this course

Pacific Dunes – removed the pressure of par 72 and 7,000 yards and a tough test

Whisting Straights – where is the influence? are other architects beyond Pete building these?

Shadow Creek - may have a great argument for the influence that it carried – leave no stone unturned….

Tobacco Road - may have an impact since every middle age designer I know has gone to see and play the course - there are few courses built after Sawgrass that can lay that claim.
« Last Edit: December 31, 2008, 04:40:11 PM by Ian Andrew »

Kalen Braley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Three most architecturally important courses since Sawgrass
« Reply #79 on: December 31, 2008, 04:52:08 PM »
To me: Architecturally important = influence on the future of architecture

Whisting Straights – where is the influence? are other architects beyond Pete building these?


Ian,

One can make a case that Chambers Bay was built as a result of the WS model....and so far to seemingly very good results for each of them.  This could very well catch on to a larger extent.

Garland Bayley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Three most architecturally important courses since Sawgrass
« Reply #80 on: December 31, 2008, 04:53:21 PM »
Ian,

I think your three picks are generally supported by the group. I would guess that the only reason Pacific Dunes did not finish second in the group totals, is that it was the second course build at the resort. Rustic of course came in third (tied). I also, don't see the reason Whistling Straits is getting the support that it has gotten.

Perhaps the message of the Castle Stuart thread is, if you want to build one of these, you had better build a Rustic Canyon or two first!
;)
"I enjoy a course where the challenges are contained WITHIN it, and recovery is part of the game  not a course where the challenge is to stay ON it." Jeff Warne

Sam Morrow

Re: Three most architecturally important courses since Sawgrass
« Reply #81 on: December 31, 2008, 04:53:48 PM »
Far and away Sand Hills has to be at the top of the list.

Then (in no particular order)...

Pacific Dunes
Pete Dye Golf Club
Chambers Bay

Honorable Mention:
Tobacco Road
Rawls Course - Texas Tech


Chip,

 I love the Rawls Course but why do you include it?

Mike_Cirba

Re: Three most architecturally important courses since Sawgrass
« Reply #82 on: December 31, 2008, 05:11:36 PM »
Sand Hills – Coore and Crenshaw
Minimalisms Landmark Course

The work at Sand Hills became the defining course for this generation – the ripples still continue to influence even the biggest names in the business. Sand Hills was a great natural site featuring massive rolling hills, natural sand blowouts, and long views out to the horizon. When presented with the site, Coore and Crenshaw realized that there were hundreds of natural holes in every direction. Rather than change the site or link the very best holes he could with long paths - they patiently walked and walked the site till he found a progression of 18 natural holes. They let the flow of the land lead them around the property. The blowouts became the primary strategy and the unique quality that sets this course apart from all others. Coore and Crenshaw recognized that these blowouts had the size and scale to compete with the wide open space and chose to swing his fairways around these features with large lateral movements. This approach was most appropriate since the wide lateral movement fit the monumental scale of the site. The course is strategically outstanding, sits in complete harmony with the scale of the site and blends perfectly into the surrounding landscape – think Prairie Dunes on a grand scale.

Pacific Dunes – Tom Doak
Greatness ignores convention

Doak was clever enough to see the opportunity to contrast David Kidd’s layout and deliver a new version of Cypress Point. He and his team resisted the period’s drive for length, and instead he opted for a golf course that was beautiful and eminently playable. It took guts to ignore the typical “minimum” 7000 yards or get constrained by other standards. The unconventional placement of threes throughout the round is a testament to using what was found, rather than forcing something in. They were smart to recognize the golf course would be very exposed to the wind, and created lots of width in the course to keep it playable in tough conditions. The use of interior bunkering to place emphasis on driving the ball in a mild wind was a clever way of keeping width and challenge at the same time. There use of interior hazards became very influential on the courses that have tried to draw on the minimalist approach. Pacific Dunes showed golf that a great course could be built without length and be intentionally playable for the average player.

Rustic Canyon – Gil Hanse
Great golf can be built for very little

The influence is primarily the economic model. The golf course design follows the land, with little shaping beyond the tees, bunkers and green sites. This means they were able to build it for a modest budget, and the course only needs a modest green fee to make a return. Since the course is well designed, it is popular with all types of players. From a beginner to scratch handicap, each player is given a different test to fit the limits of their skill. Because it is so well liked, the course is busy, which guarantees the course will generate income for the community or ownership.

The genius of the design is the course echoes the strategies and spirit of St. Andrew’s better than almost any other course designed in recent times. The green’s are very complex and involve strict placement off the tee to ensure access to pin positions. The turf beyond the greens is kept intentionally short to make the ground game the game of choice. This brings in an element of chance and luck rarely seen on other modern courses. The bunkering is present, but like St. Andrew’s, the player feels they have lots of room to play safe away from most bunkering. The fairways are wide, with an immense amount of options, but often the most dangerous route is the one that opens up the green. Gil Hanse, Jim Wagner and Geoff Shackelford have managed to bring the spirit of Scottish golf into a California Canyon.


I agree, Ian, and think you could almost interchange Rustic Canyon with Wild Horse.   I give the nod to the former because it shows you can do it near major metro areas, and not just in the sticks.