News:

This discussion group is best enjoyed using Google Chrome, Firefox or Safari.

Pages: 1 [2]

Matt_Ward

Re: Laurel Valley
« Reply #25 on: September 19, 2008, 08:48:44 PM »
Tommy:

The issue is about compelling architecture -- not exclusivity. Two completely different items.
Logged

Tommy Williamsen

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Laurel Valley
« Reply #26 on: September 19, 2008, 09:07:15 PM »
Quote from: Matt_Ward on September 19, 2008, 08:48:44 PM
Tommy:

The issue is about compelling architecture -- not exclusivity. Two completely different items.

Matt, I was merely stating that a very small percentage of courses are in the top 100.  I understand about compelling architecture.
Logged
Where there is no love, put love; there you will find love.
St. John of the Cross

"Deep within your soul-space is a magnificent cathedral where you are sweet beyond telling." Rumi

Matt_Ward

Re: Laurel Valley
« Reply #27 on: September 19, 2008, 09:27:26 PM »
Tommy:

Candidly, I see LV being lucky to grab a top ten spot in Pennsy because of the competition within the Keystone State.

For you LV may be a top 100 course -- I think Jim F said it best -- Digest raters may like it a lot -- but Golfweek ones will likely pan it and give it much less of a grade. The differences between the panels generally reflects the key priorities each has for course standing.

Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back