News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Troy Alderson

tournament architecture vs. acreage, no takers?
« on: April 03, 2006, 07:51:12 PM »
A post in Doak's top 50 courses thread as prompted me to ask this question.  To hold a PGA tournament, is design more important than acreage or vis versa?  Many golf courses have held tournaments that are not great designs but have the acreage to hold the tournament.  So which is it?

Troy Alderson
GC Supt
Kah-Nee-Ta Resort GC
Warm Springs, OR
« Last Edit: April 03, 2006, 08:25:10 PM by Troy Alderson »

paul cowley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:tournament architecture vs. acreage, no takers?
« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2006, 08:49:38 PM »
Troy its really both ....a course definitely has to have the hospitality acreage on site....space for on site parking is a plus but can be arranged on a off site shuttle basis.
paul cowley...golf course architect/asgca

Ryan Farrow

Re:tournament architecture vs. acreage, no takers?
« Reply #2 on: April 03, 2006, 09:20:34 PM »
I would imagine the TPC at Scottsdale. With over 500,000 guests I can't think of many other Golf courses around Phoenix that could accommodate that amount of people. And the course is average at best.
« Last Edit: April 03, 2006, 09:25:01 PM by Ryan Farrow »

JESII

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:tournament architecture vs. acreage, no takers?
« Reply #3 on: April 04, 2006, 08:43:31 AM »
There are varying levels of architectural quality required (that level is different for the different organizing bodies), that once met becomes secondary to acreage concerns. Along witht he acreage concerns, I assume we are to include facilities considerations.