This would be an interesting case to follow. If the plaintiff is smart he would fess up to being gay and greatly enhance his chances by being in a protected class. Better yet, he could confess to actually being without balls and be treated either as a woman or gay and disabled.
If the allegations are factual, the club does deserve to be punished. No one should be treated that way.
On the other hand, this type of behavior (not the newsletter part which I find hard to believe, unless it is just an informal rag for the caddy shack) is not all that unusual in golf. A friend of mine is a fairly prominent member of a well-known country club in the area. He is part American Indian and gets savaged on a regular basis (like when we walked into the 19th hole and were greeted with a bunch of war calls). Of course, he can dish it out as well which makes me wonder if the plaintiff in the case was not a prankster himself with thin skin.
BTW, what is the deal at many NY, NJ private clubs requiring caddies? At $70 to $100 per bag carrying double, it is attracting an interesting, older mix of people. Not only does this practice add more expense to an already expensive game, but it introduces new variables which could very easily result in more suits like this one.