While it frustrates me to no end that Raynor is so highly praised for essentially building replicas of replicas, I will give him credit for choosing replica holes that could be built anywhere because they do not rely heavily on an outside element (wind, ocean, etc.) to make them challenging. Essentially they are all about accurancy with different length shots.
But if Seth III did not get his calls returned by the Seth Raynor Society, I'd have to suggest:
1) 13th at Muirfield - slightly angled approach to a narrow (long-wise), back-to-front, side-sloping green.
2) 3rd at Lost Dunes - Uneasiness off the tee because the green is slightly obscured by the carry-rough. The green is world class from every direction.
3) Modified Par3 that essentially takes the approach on #1 or #12 at Oakmont. Nobody seems to be front to back slopes greens on Par3s. Make it a longer Par3 with firm ground that would allow it to bounce on to a front pin.
4) #6 at Tobacco Road, because it does a great job of utilizing about a 120* look at the green from different tees.
5) #11 at Cuscowilla (even without the lake). The green reminds me of #13 at Prestwick. Something that incorporates a severe green like that, from a short, medium or long distance.
5a) #4 at Warren Course. Talk about a hole that could be built anywhere, on any ground. It's all about a great green on a short hole. It reminds me of one of those old baseball gloves from the 1930s (without a catching web), with all the rolls and ridges and run-offs.