I have no dog in this fight, but I am a member of Woodway C.C. in Darien, CT - A Willie Park, Jr design in 1916.
Having played the course for over 38 years since the age of five, I can pass along some observations about Woodway that tie back to the design principles mentioned in the book quotation above.
Woodway's best attribute IMHO is the green complex as evidenced by a variety of green shapes and defenses. Most of the original 16 holes allow the opportnity to run the ball in - especially on the long par 4's and 5's. As was prevalent in the "Pan and Shovel" construction era, Mr. Park, Jr. would drag the fill to the proposed green area, and then, construct side and back mounding that could either corral the slightly missed shot, or send it careening down a hill much further away from the green. The resulting pitch in the pre-sand/lob wedge era was probably a one to two shot penalty. As with many courses from the 1900-1930's, long was wrong. Most of the original greens have pronounced back to front slopes for drainage, and he incorporated a two-tier green system into the elevated greens to aid the stopping power of the uphill approach. He made great use of false fronts & "Greens within greens". His bunkering of Woodway matches the philosophy as quoted from his book - rounded edges, and deep enough to hold the wayward shot.
To me, the design beauty of Willie Park, Jr. at Woodway was the optimization of the land that he had to work with. The routing, while creating some parallel holes, did maximize the total acreage while visiting the more prominent and architecturally valuable features of the plot as often as possible. An aerial photograph from 1921 reveals to me that he tried to create a links style golf course in a park/inland setting - as much as the conditions would permit. Woodway's membership commissioned Willie to create the finest championship golf course in the NYC Metropolitan area, and selected him over Tillinghast and Ross to carry out their mission.
While subsequent renovations for the irrigation/water flow done on the property in the 1950's/60's/70's opened up new opportunities (Especially in terms of linked, meandering streams), the original 16 holes of his plan had held up well vs. steel/graphite/surlyn/Pro-V advances.
The later re-routing of one hole to maximize a lake, as well as a new par 3 to bring the course back to a new clubhouse have not held up as well, and seem somewhat out of character to the original design which is more playable IMHO. Note that these new/remodeled holes had the benefits of modern technology and construction devices.
The intricacies of the putting complexes at WCC have kept the course vital and somewhat resistant to scoring at a little under 6,800 yards from the tips.
Just my 2 cents...
JWK