Philip,
you will have a great time at Gleneagles, providing you take LOTS of cash!
As to the quality of the golf, my personal opinion is that it is splendid. Beautiful surroundings, wildlife, fresh air in abundance....
And yet, it is about Gleneagles where I have my only disagreements with the Good Doctor on ANY Golf Architectural subject. Here's some of the things he has to say about the place...and my interpretations!
"It is more or less common knowlege that over 50,000 pounds has been spent on the course, and of this sum a great deal was clearly expended in destroying the natural features which would have created its strategy and interest".
Drivel. The golf courses all run through the glorious post-glacial mounds and hollows over fantastic turf amongst lovely stands of native birch and pine.
"...the King's Course...it is almost devoid of strategy, interest, excitement and thrills..."
Errant nonsense. It is a splendid track (if a little short nowadays) which will test every bit of golfing skill you possess.
"There are none of the little banks and hollows which make the that make the British seaside links so fascinating"
Utter Bollocks! I don't know which golf course HE was looking at when he decided this gem, but it wasn't Gleneagles!!!
And the Kicker...
"At Gleneagles there are no heated discussions as to the unfairness of the holes, because there is nothing to discuss".
Pompous arrogance at its finest!!!
However, we must temper these comments in the light of the fact that MacK was the FIRST Architect they consulted and then promptly handed the job to Braid. Professional jealousy rather than objective criticism would appear to be the driving force behind these comments, don't you think!!??
FBD.