News:

This discussion group is best enjoyed using Google Chrome, Firefox or Safari.


Michael Moore

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Another Week...Another Ruling?
« Reply #25 on: April 20, 2004, 07:28:11 AM »
Decision 23/2 says that

"If a stone is partially embedded and may be picked up with ease, it is a loose impediment."

Presumably, if Cink's ball were not in the way, the stones in question could have been picked up with ease. But because he would have moved his ball by picking them up, he was unable to, and instead removed them by gouging them out of the sand.

I am beginning to see the light here. It's just like Slugger White said - he was removing loose impediments. The rules do not say that you have to daintily pick them up between your fingers.
Metaphor is social and shares the table with the objects it intertwines and the attitudes it reconciles. Opinion, like the Michelin inspector, dines alone. - Adam Gopnik, The Table Comes First

George Pazin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Another Week...Another Ruling?
« Reply #26 on: April 20, 2004, 01:18:07 PM »
My only question is why was Slugger White with the group in the playoff?

Surely it would have been simpler to have Matt Ward there to make a ruling as he saw fit, rulebook be damned. :)
Big drivers and hot balls are the product of golf course design that rewards the hit one far then hit one high strategy.  Shinny showed everyone how to take care of this whole technology dilemma. - Pat Brockwell, 6/24/04

Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back