I had forgotten he was otherwise non-qualified, the gap between WF in September, with BDC and no gallery, and all, it became lost in my mix... I third the motion without reservation. As a popular figure, with chops, a big, big winner with the well-stated entertainment appeal, he falls just short of Arnold Palmer for this last generation, just as his top dog, Woods falls just short of Nicklaus' kingship.
As they were well to give Arnold an exemption, I believe, at age 64 in 1994 to go round in Oakmont's spawn territory, Phil deserves one, at age 51, in San Diego on a course he can rightfully claim as part of his biography. He is also still close enough to his winning era, so that the invite isn't JUST a sentimental forbearance.