As to coloration, I find the bright white sand to be the better presentation for most parkland courses such as this. Like the browner dirt and grayer, "beach" sands seem naturally fitted to links, shore and certain hill n' dale inland sites, for a course intended to be bold, green and trim, the bright white is excellent contrast, and casts the edges and surrounding contour into full relief.
In the macro picture, Bellerive is showing beautifully as exemplar of the RTJ "hard-par/easy bogey, course beautiful, utilitarian" architecture. Whether you like it or not (I have come to) is another matter, but this is it, right here.
I want to call special attention to the green size - divisions and the multiple tees (when you can see them on the screen)...this is what makes a RTJ course of this high style, a much greater pleasure to play/tackle than what can be seen on the screen. Those massive green margins and the swelling tapered contours that divide them not only govern expert play back to the tee (as we're seeing), but make the course seem fresh and different every day...
... a water hazard, a bunker or rough slope on one side which means little one day, is a thing to be countenanced the next...with just a 35 ft move of the pin and/or a different section/location of a tee box, especially so on the par 3s. If you're not positioned or unable to execute a shot to the proper section, you are constantly confronted with huge breaking, huge distance-judgment putts as well as a number of 35-40 yard recoveries that can necessitate flops, running chips and closely-mown spinners.
Of course I can understand any negative reactions to watching a great preponderance of lag putting from 50, 60 and 70 feet or more -- it does not make for super TV -- but it is a wonderful skill challenge for mortals to encounter.
(((All of this year's majors have had a compelling final round/solid leaderboard, but this PGA is the entertaining as all get-out)))
cheers vk