News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Ian Mackenzie

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: 250
« Reply #25 on: August 04, 2016, 08:25:31 AM »
YOu still have to "roll the rock" and hole putts to go that low.[/size]Has anyone/body done any studies on putting?Is it better today with all these technology-laden, weight-balanced, pieces of carbon fiber tungsten things that hardly fit in a golf bag?Take an 8802 and a Bulls Eye and compare that with one of those unsightly Taylor Made Spider things that Jason Day uses. Tell me it's easier to knock in putts inside 8' with these!!Plus, the Super Stroke grips!! Who has putting stat comparisons for past 20 years?
Logged

Thomas Dai

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: 250
« Reply #26 on: August 04, 2016, 09:11:25 AM »
Quote from: Ian Mackenzie on August 04, 2016, 08:25:31 AM
Has anyone/body done any studies on putting?


Dave Pelz's various analysis would be a good place to start your investigation.


Atb
Logged

Ulrich Mayring

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: 250
« Reply #27 on: August 04, 2016, 12:47:05 PM »
Stephan Jaeger shot his 58 with a 50-year-old PING Manganese Bronze Anser putter he found in a friend's closet.

Any more research needed? :)

Ulrich
Logged
Golf Course Exposé (300+ courses reviewed), Golf CV (how I keep track of 'em)

Doug Siebert

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: 250
« Reply #28 on: August 04, 2016, 04:47:57 PM »
Quote from: BCrosby on August 01, 2016, 09:18:31 AM
For a course to play today as a 6900 course did in 1930 (a not unusual length for championship play at the time), the modern course needs to be about 8200 yards. That should be shocking.


You sure about that? I'd think it would need to be closer to 9000.
Logged
My hovercraft is full of eels.
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up