Last week I had the opportunity to play Rosses Point a couple of times, I was really shocked to see some of the "improvements" they are making to golf course. I understand the notion of building new tee's or adding some bunkers to protect older courses against modern equipment but adding length to a course by removing some Harry Colt greens just to add 30 - 40 yards seems nuts to me. Its really a shame that a classic Colt course is being "improved" this way, its like a modern painter deciding to make the woman in the Mona Lisa a little thinner. I'm curious what others that have seen the changes they are making think?
Can I just say how much I like your Mona Lisa analogy.
I played it a couple of weeks ago and the changes so far (Phase 1) are the one new green on the 3rd (another new one is planned for the 14th), extended greens on 1, 2, 5 and 10, some new bunkering and tees. The feelings about the changes are mixed, although the members I spoke to all raved about the two green extensions on holes 1 and 2, and the new green on 3.
I'm writing an article about the course and the changes, and I have yet to interview Pat Ruddy about these changes, but if anyone wants to read the recent Irish Golfer Magazine interview with Pat,
it's here on page 26-30.
Did you take a good look at the 10th, Phil? The enormous new bunker to the left of the green and the green extension feel very odd and, to be frank, out of place.
The course is one of my favourites and I think the quest to 'upgrade' County Sligo GC is misguided. Why meddle with perfection... and perfection that has Harry Colt written all over it?