The irony is that David is discussing the individual merits of the hole, where my point is in regard to the routing of the course.
I am definitely talking about the routing, Mark.
You seem to assume that the flat holes such as 1 or 2 are some sort of compromise or neccessary evil to reach the good land but you ignore the fact that:
1. Coore could have built the course without holes on the flat land of 1,2, and 16 and instead built holes in dramatic dunes to the east of the course.
2. Coore likes to build holes on flat land because he thinks they are an important part of the golf course.
Coore could have built the entire course in dramatic dunes and I think you would learn a lot more about routing if you asked yourself:
1. why he chose flatter land?
2. what advantages did he get by using flatter land?
3. what can an architect do on flat land that he can't do in dunes land (hint: build the 2nd green at lost farm)
I like the following quote from Tillinghast and I think it applies well to the routing of Lost Farm: “A round of golf should present eighteen inspirations—not necessarily thrills, for spectacular holes may be sadly overdone. Every hole may be constructed to provide charm without being obtrusive with it. When I speak of a hole being inspiring, it is not intended to infer that the visitor is to be subject to attacks of hysteria on every teeing ground as he casts his eye over the fairway…”
David,
You are not talking about the routing, you're waffling on about flat holes.
You jumped straight in and assumed I was talking about the quality of the two holes, suggesting that I had missed two great green complexes.
When I replied,"the green complexes don't change the routing", you replied with-"huh", you clearly had no idea what I was talking about.
Your use of "necessary evil" provides a clear insight of what you're thinking.
Maybe you should consider this: I have spent the last 10 years building and modifying a 9 hole golf course on a very small property. The routing decisions have been like a 10,000 piece jigsaw puzzle of a blue sky. On one hand there are so many options, but on the other, there are few. This experience, whilst on a small scale, has lead me to appreciate and respect the architects skill in determining the routing.
I explained what I meant by my comment quite clearly in my 3rd post in this thread. You seem to have latched onto "compromise" and interpreted "compromise" to some how mean "necessary evil". You fail to understand that the entire routing process involves decisions within constraints, the entire process is full of compromise.
Regarding LF and the holes routed across the flat part: I'm not going to enter into assumptions behind the decision. Obviously the routing through the dunes to the east didn't work. My point is in regard to the fact that it happens early in the round.
That's a wonderful quote from Tillinghurst, I've heard it before.